Joshua Cohen

ORCID: 0000-0003-1227-8416
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Political Theory and Influence
  • American Constitutional Law and Politics
  • Library Science and Administration
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Education Systems and Policy
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Political Economy and Marxism
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Asian Culture and Media Studies
  • Japanese History and Culture
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • European and International Law Studies
  • Cultural Industries and Urban Development
  • African history and culture studies
  • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Military and Defense Studies
  • Educational Practices and Policies
  • Law, Rights, and Freedoms
  • World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
  • Political Theology and Sovereignty
  • Library Science and Information Literacy
  • School Choice and Performance

Apple (United States)
2019-2025

Landscape Research Group
2023

Authorised Association Consortium
2023

Apple (Germany)
2019

Kimberly-Clark (Canada)
2018

Weatherford College
2018

University of Regina
2018

Fordham University
2016

Harvard University Press
1998-2011

Cambridge University Press
2011

Claus Offe is one of the leading social scientists working in Germany today, and his work, particularly on welfare state, has been enormously influential both Europe United States. Contradictions Welfare State first collection Offe's essays to appear a single volume English, it contains selection most important recent work breakdown post-war settlement. The political writings this book are primarily concerned with origins present difficulties - what calls 'crises crisis management'...

10.2307/2185456 article EN The Philosophical Review 1988-07-01

This essay by Joshua Cohen and Charles Sabel promotes visions of democracy, constitutionalism institutional innovations which may help to open up new dimensions in the search for legitimate European governance structures their constitutionalisation. Faced with Europe's legitimacy problems, proponents project often react pointing many failings (national) constitutional state. These reactions, however, seem simplistic, offering no normatively convincing alternatives once undisputed a now...

10.1111/1468-0386.00034 article EN European Law Journal 1997-12-01

10.1177/0032329292020004003 article EN Politics & Society 1992-12-01

10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00060.x article Philosophy &amp Public Affairs 2006-03-01

10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00197.x article EN Journal of Political Philosophy 2004-05-10

10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.01144.x article EN Philosophy &amp Public Affairs 2008-12-30

Jürgen Habermas is a radical democrat. The source of that self‐designation his conception democracy—what he calls “discursive democracy”—is founded on the ideal “a self‐organizing community free and equal citizens,” coordinating their collective affairs through common reason. author discusses three large challenges to this radical‐democratic self‐regulation: 1) What role private autonomy in view? 2) does reason play self‐regulation? 3) relevance might outlook have for contemporary...

10.1111/1467-9337.00132 article EN Ratio Juris 1999-12-01

There are two principal philosophical conceptions of socialism, corresponding to interpretations the notion a rational society. The first conception corresponds an instrumental view social rationality. Captured by image socialism as “one big workshop,” holds that ownership means production is because it promotes optimal development productive forces. Social eliminates costs coordination imposed conduct economic activities in formally independent enterprises, and, more generally, overcomes...

10.1017/s0265052500000625 article EN Social Philosophy and Policy 1989-01-01

10.2307/2069562 article EN Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews 1985-09-01

10.1086/293119 article Ethics 1989-07-01

In conversation with Barocas, Hardt, and Narayanan’s Fairness Machine Learning (FaML), we seek to broaden the scope of normative argument about machine learning algorithmic decision making. Beginning from an understanding fair cooperation among free equal persons as a fundamental political value, argue that concerns fairness need be expanded in three ways. First, unfairness discrimination are not only matter systematic group subordination. We consider other forms disadvantaged groups but...

10.1145/3718989 article EN ACM Journal on Responsible Computing 2025-02-22
Coming Soon ...