Julia G. Stapels

ORCID: 0000-0003-1347-9607
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Psychology of Social Influence
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Innovation, Technology, and Society

Bielefeld University
2019-2024

University of Cologne
2019-2021

University Hospital Cologne
2018

Attitudes towards robots are not always unequivocally positive or negative: when attitudes encompass both strong and negative evaluations about an attitude object, people experience unpleasant state of evaluative conflict, called ambivalence. To shed light on ambivalence robots, we conducted a mixed-methods experiment with N = 163 German university students that investigated the influence robot autonomy robot-related attitudes. With technological progress, become increasingly autonomous. We...

10.1007/s12369-021-00817-2 article EN cc-by International Journal of Social Robotics 2021-08-13

Ambivalence, the simultaneous experience of both positive and negative feelings about one same attitude object, has been investigated within psychological research for decades. Ambivalence is interpreted as an attitudinal conflict with distinct affective, behavioral, cognitive consequences. In social research, it shown that ambivalence sometimes confused neutrality due to use measures cannot distinguish between ambivalence. Likewise, in robotics attitudes users are often characterized...

10.1371/journal.pone.0244697 article EN cc-by PLoS ONE 2021-01-13

Abstract When encountering social robots, potential users are often facing a dilemma between privacy and utility. That is, high utility comes at the cost of lenient settings, allowing robot to store personal data connect internet permanently, which brings in associated security risks. However, date, it still remains unclear how this affects attitudes behavioral intentions towards respective robot. To shed light on influence robot’s settings robot-related intentions, we conducted two online...

10.1007/s12369-023-01043-8 article EN cc-by International Journal of Social Robotics 2023-09-22

Various works show that proxemics occupies an important role in human-robot interaction and appropriate proxemic depends on many characteristics of humans robots. However, there is none shows the relationship between emotional state expressed by a user reaction robot to it, social these interactants. In current experiment (N = 82), we investigate this using online study which examine response (i.e., approaching, not moving, moving away) person's anger, fear, disgust, surprise, sadness, joy)...

10.1109/ro-man50785.2021.9515502 article EN 2021-08-08

Abstract Robots are a source of evaluative conflict and thus elicit ambivalence. In fact, psychological research has shown across domains that people simultaneously report strong positive negative evaluations about one the same attitude object. This is defined as current research, we extended existing ambivalence by measuring towards various robot-related stimuli using explicit (i.e., self-report) implicit measures. Concretely, used mouse tracking approach to gain insights into experience...

10.1007/s12369-024-01112-6 article EN cc-by International Journal of Social Robotics 2024-03-18
Coming Soon ...