Cristina Fernández-Pacheco Estrada

ORCID: 0000-0003-2190-3201
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Issues and Policies in Latin America
  • Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • Educational Technology in Learning
  • Human Rights and Immigration
  • Education and Teacher Training
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
  • Violence, Education, and Gender Studies
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management
  • Comparative International Legal Studies
  • Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Torture, Ethics, and Law
  • Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Global Peace and Security Dynamics
  • Educational Innovations and Technology
  • Media and Digital Communication
  • Data Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Spanish History and Politics
  • War, Law, and Justice
  • Corporate Insolvency and Governance

University of Alicante
2006-2024

Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología
2024

University of Guayaquil
2024

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
2024

In the Katanga and Bemba trial judgments, International Criminal Court was faced with problem of how to resolve cumulative convictions based on same set facts. The decided adopt Čelebići test, which developed applied predominantly by ad hoc international tribunals US case law. present article challenges suitability this test in criminal law, pointing out problems it raises national regard, evidence is furnished that not prevailing United States Supreme other tests principles used domestic...

10.1093/jicj/mqx038 article EN Journal of International Criminal Justice 2017-07-25

¿De minimis non curat praetor?La aplicación del principio de intervención mínima en la jurisprudencia ante supuestos menor entidad Sumario -En ocasiones, una literal precepto penal permite el castigo conductas leves, inmorales o socialmente reprobables, pero dudosa relevancia penal.En teoría, reserva acción a los ataques más graves contra bienes jurídicos importantes.Doctrina y mayoritaria coinciden al entender que este se dirige prioritariamente legislador, debe construir política criminal...

10.31009/indret.2024.i1.09 article ES cc-by-nc InDret 2024-02-13

Abstract The gravity of the crime committed has been considered ‘a factor fundamental importance’ when deciding early release a person convicted by ad hoc tribunals. Hence, most decisions rendered International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Residual Mechanism Tribunals include this determine whether it weighs in favour or against release. Conversely, reduction sentence case Thomas Lubanga, Court Panel stated 2015 that ‘unlike at other international criminal tribunals,...

10.1017/s0922156524000037 article EN cc-by-nc-sa Leiden Journal of International Law 2024-03-12

El objeto de este artículo es presentar los primeros resultados la investigación realizada sobre las concesiones indultos en España durante años 2000-2008. Ante falta estadísticas acceso público, se construyó una amplia base datos que ha permitido conocer el número concedidos y su distribución conforme a distintas variables. La posibilitado así obtener importante información práctica del indulto contrastar algunos oficiales, además diversas hipótesis trabajo cada variables analizadas (número...

10.46381/reic.v9i0.62 article ES cc-by-nc Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica 2011-04-28
Coming Soon ...