A5030628294- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Sports injuries and prevention
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Bone fractures and treatments
- Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
- Foot and Ankle Surgery
- Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
- Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
- Trauma Management and Diagnosis
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Hôpital Ambroise-Paré
2011-2024
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
2024
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
2024
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
2018
Clinique Claude-Bernard
2018
Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
2012
Université Paris Cité
2012
Hôpital d'Enfants
2009
Université d'été de Boulogne-sur-Mer
2007
It remains unclear whether results differ between a Latarjet procedure performed after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair and one as the primary operation.
Background: The preoperative number of dislocations has been previously proved to be a major factor influencing the results after Bankart repair with more correlated higher recurrence rates and reoperations. This could possibly because lower quality tissue repaired during procedure multiple dislocations. On other hand, Latarjet does not “repair” but rather reconstructs augments anterior glenoid. Purpose/Hypothesis: main objective was report clinical outcomes patients undergoing 1 dislocation...
Case: A patient presented with complete coracoclavicular ligament ossification after an unnoticed acromioclavicular joint Rockwood Type IV dislocation. He had full passive range of motion in the glenohumeral but was disabled by a loss both active (80°) and (90°) abduction due to insufficient scapulo-thoracic motion. treated arthroscopic osteotomy ossification. Conclusion: One year surgery, improved 45° (80°-125°) no recurrence on radiographs. Arthroscopic seems effective restoring these...