A5055124864- Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Economic and Social Issues
- Environmental law and policy
- Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Economic Theory and Institutions
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
- Risk Perception and Management
- Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
- Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Environmental Science and Technology
- Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
- Human Rights and Development
- Economic Theory and Policy
- Global Health Care Issues
- Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Global trade and economics
- International Law and Human Rights
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
University of Fribourg
2017-2024
University of Graz
2013-2016
University of Oxford
2015-2016
University of Zurich
2010-2013
Climate change can be interpreted as a unique case of historical injustice involving issues both intergenerational and global justice. We split the issue into two separate questions. First, how should emission rights distributed? Second, who come up for costs coping with climate change? regard first question being an pure distributive justice argue on prioritarian grounds that developing world receive higher per capita than developed world. This is justified by fact latter already owns...
Abstract The emission of greenhouse gases causes climate change. Therefore, many support a global cap on emissions. How then should the emissions allowed under this be distributed? We first show that above average past cannot used to justify right current sketch three basic principles distributive justice (egalitarianism, prioritarianism, and sufficientarianism) argue, first, prioritarian standards are most plausible and, second, they speak in favour giving people developing countries higher...
It is easy to put words on paper; it harder them into practice. This evidenced by the frequent discrepancy between a country's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) and its actual climate policies. In this article, we examine whether such disharmony should be criticized. We first provide taxonomy of types disharmony. then various problems with settling case for strong norm harmonization simply referring general principle that commitments ought kept. opens door paying more attention...
BOOK REVIEWS Eric Posner and David Weisbach, Climate Change Justice (Dominic Roser) Simon P. James, The Presence of Nature (Ted Toadvine) Macauley, Elemental Philosophy (David E. Cooper) Ralf Eriksson Jan Otto Andersson, Elements Ecological Economics (Benjamin Horn)