A5083662559- Cultural Differences and Values
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Religion and Society Interactions
- Emotional Labor in Professions
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Public Administration and Governance
- Workplace Violence and Bullying
- International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
- Religion, Society, and Development
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Higher Education and Employability
- Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Information and Cyber Security
- Turkey's Politics and Society
- Spam and Phishing Detection
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Gender and Feminist Studies
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University
2012-2023
Muğla University
2004
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
2002
The authors examined the links between two dimensions that have been useful in understanding cross-cultural differences and similarities, namely, individualism-collectivism (I-C) value orientations. relations parallels variables by directly relating them examining patterns of both with a third variable, religiosity. Participants were 475 college students from Philippines, United States, Turkey who responded to measures horizontal vertical I-C, orientations, found partial support for I-C...
Based on theorization the four basic dimensions of religiousness, Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging, corresponding cognitive, emotional, moral, social motives functions religion, we developed a measure investigated cross-cultural consistency as well interindividual variability. Data were collected from 14 countries varying in religious heritage: Catholicism, Protestantism, Orthodox Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism/Taoism ( N = 3,218). Beyond their high interrelation common...
Intergroup relations are more competitive and discordant than between interacting individuals. Social identity theory suggests that this discontinuity should be greatest among individuals who identify strongly with their in-group. To test prediction, students from countries collectivistic individualistic cultures completed a measure of self-construal. They were then asked to how they would respond conflict, either another individual, group or country country. Participants responded...
Is fundamentalism universal across religious cultures?We investigated this issue by focusing on three questions: (1) the dimensionality of fundamentalism, as measured Religious Fundamentalism Scale (Altemeyer & Hunsberger, 2004); (2) very nature denoting dogmatic belief, moral rigorism, or strong groupness; and (3) interreligious prejudice predicted uniquely, additively, interactively religiousness socio-cognitive rigidity.We collected data from 14 countries Catholic, Protestant, Christian...
ABSTRACTWhen allocators make decisions about distributing resources, they face a dilemma if the expectations for consequences that will flow from particular choices are incongruent with each other. For example, certain allocation choice might be expected to an allocator appear warm and likable but unfair. Previous research has found culture can shape these perceptions and, thus, their congruence or incongruence. The present study further investigated ideas. Differences between Turkish U.S....
Respondents from Turkey and the United States solved micro- macro-justice dilemmas requiring them to allocate scholarships governance board memberships. Recipients were either groups or individuals who members of respondents’in-groups out-groups. Turkish respondents showed a stronger preference than U.S. for macro deservingness only when recipients their in-groups and, in general, preferred in-group over out-group recipients. Both used principles more with group versus individual
Objectives. Developing a comprehensive model to understand intergroup relationship through integrating two constructs usually used be examined discretely; self-stereotyping and stereotyping. Background. Today’s understanding of behavior is firmly grounded in concepts related stereotypes. In literature, apparently, there are, dominant approaches studying stereotype’s effect on relations. The first approach focuses the group’s stereotype relation, while second impacts self stereotyping...