A5059770193- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Academic Writing and Publishing
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Radiation Dose and Imaging
Springer Nature (United Kingdom)
2020
BioMed Central (United Kingdom)
2017-2019
Abstract Background The peer review process has been questioned as it may fail to allow the publication of high-quality articles. This study aimed evaluate accuracy in identifying inadequate reporting RCT reports by early career researchers (ECRs) using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus usual process. Methods We performed a cross-sectional diagnostic 119 manuscripts, from BMC series medical journals, BMJ , Open and Annals Emergency Medicine results two-arm...
To develop a tool to assess the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research.We conducted an online survey intended for editors and authors. The aimed (1) determine if participants endorse proposed definition report quality; (2) identify most important items include final version (3) any missing items. Participants rated on 5-point scale whether item should be included they were also invited comment importance wording each item. Principal component analysis was performed examine...
Systematic reviews evaluating the impact of interventions to improve quality peer review for biomedical publications highlighted that were limited and have little impact. This study aims compare accuracy early career reviewers who use an innovative online tool usual reviewer process in completeness reporting switched primary outcomes completed reports.