Sally Wortley

ORCID: 0000-0003-2519-2582
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Biomedical and Engineering Education
  • Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology

The University of Sydney
2004-2023

Government of Western Australia Department of Health
2022

Department of Health and Aged Care
2021

ACT Government
2021

Menzies School of Health Research
2018-2021

Faculty of Public Health
2019

Bond University
2018

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
2015

New York University Press
2015

Cambridge University Press
2015

To identify characteristics (factors) about health technology assessment (HTA) decisions that are important to the public in determining whether engagement should be undertaken and reasons for these choices.Focus groups using a nominal group technique rank factors relevant HTA decision-making. Thematic analysis was also describe underpinning participants' choices rankings.Members of Australian general public.58 people, aged 19-71 years participated 6 focus groups.24 were identified by...

10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010265 article EN cc-by-nc BMJ Open 2016-01-01

Objectives The aim of the present study was to describe community views and perspectives on public engagement processes in Australian health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. Methods Six focus groups were held Sydney (NSW, Australia) as part a broad program work HTA. Eligible participants aged ≥18 years spoke English. Participants asked about their HTA decision-making process, with responses analysed using participation framework. Results Fifty-eight 19-71 attended groups....

10.1071/ah15221 article EN Australian Health Review 2016-04-07

At a health system level, the importance of patient and public input into healthcare decision making is well recognised. Patient involvement not only provides mechanism to legitimise decisions, but also contributes improved translation these decisions practice, ultimately leading better outcomes. Recent reviews in technology assessment space have identified need for, increased use of, through systematic methodologies. Yet, what does this mean practical terms? This paper outlines both short-...

10.1071/ah15216 article EN Australian Health Review 2016-05-25

Objectives Given the changing understanding of overdiagnosis screen detected cancers and advances in technology to detect prevent cancer, updating scaling back cancer screening programmes is becoming increasingly necessary. The National Cervical Screening Programme (NCSP) Australia was recently deintensified, with changes implemented December 2017. This study examines women’s acceptance renewed protocol how such can be communicated more effectively. Design Focus groups structured around a...

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029319 article EN cc-by-nc BMJ Open 2019-10-01

Much attention in recent years has been given to the topic of public engagement health technology assessment (HTA) decision-making. HTA organizations spend substantial resources and time on undertaking engagement, numerous studies have examined challenges barriers decision-making process however uncertainty remains as optimal methods incorporate views Little research done ascertain whether current processes align with preferences what extent their desire for is dependent question being asked...

10.1186/s12911-015-0176-0 article EN cc-by BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2015-07-12

Objective To qualitatively examine the experiences with, and impact of, evidence‐based online resources in self‐management among Australians with osteoarthritis. Methods Telephone interviews were conducted 36 users of a novel osteoarthritis resource, Osteoarthritis Awareness Hub. Rogers’ 5 attributes innovation (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, observability) outcomes guided semistructured interview analysis. Maximum variation sampling was used, data saturation...

10.1002/acr.23572 article EN publisher-specific-oa Arthritis Care & Research 2018-04-02

To develop an international template to support patient submissions in Health Technology Assessments (HTAs). This was be based on the experience and feedback from implementation use of Scottish Medicines Consortium's (SMC) Summary Information for Patient Groups (SIP).To gather SMC experience, web-based surveys were conducted with pharmaceutical companies groups familiar SIP. Semistructured interviews representatives HTA bodies undertaken, along group discussions those less SIP, explore...

10.1017/s0266462321000167 article EN cc-by International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2021-01-01

There are a range of treatment options for osteoarthritis (OA) the knee and hip, each with unique profile risks benefits. Patient decision aids can help incorporate patient preferences in decision-making. The aim this study was to develop test utility aid OA that developed using multicriteria analytic framework.People contemplating who had accessed website myjointpain.org.au were invited participate by online aid. Two forms created: A shorter form longer form, which allowed greater...

10.1111/hex.13505 article EN cc-by Health Expectations 2022-08-30

Choosing Wisely recommendations could reduce physical therapists' use of low-value care.To investigate whether language influences willingness to follow the Australian Physiotherapy Association's (APA) recommendations.Best-worst Scaling survey METHODS: The six original APA were modified based on four characteristics (level detail, strength- qualified/unqualified, framing, and alternatives care) create 60 recommendations. Physical therapists randomised a block seven choice tasks, which...

10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100534 article EN cc-by Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2023-07-01

<h3>Objectives</h3> The aim of this study is to explore physiotherapist's preferences for framing the Australian Physiotherapy Association (APA) Choosing Wisely recommendations, thereby indicating aspects wording that could increase acceptance. <h3>Method</h3> We will conduct an online discrete choice experiment with ~400 physiotherapist members APA who are currently registered and practicing. Participants indicate their agreement initial six recommendations (strongly...

10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.112 article EN Poster presentations 2018-08-01

A decision aid for osteoarthritis was developed using the best available evidence on effect size, potential harms and self-rated performance other attributes. The a multi-criteria analytic tool capable of combing an individual's preferences attributes related to treatment.

10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-905 article EN Studies in health technology and informatics 2015-01-01
Coming Soon ...