I. The Problematic: domain of testimony What is testimony? Objections and clarifications II. Tradition: Testimony, observation, the reductive approach Deciding for analogical Scottish fundamentalism III. Solution: status Language mind IV: Puzzles: Astonishing reports disappearance history Dretske's drinker V. Applications: Collingwood historical Mathematical knowledge reliable authority Psychology law Experts

In this book Foley offers a major new theory of rationality. His aim is to escape the 'doldrums Descartes' by lowering standard for what rational from his impossibly demanding level certainty. takes belief's being as matter its seeming some perspective be objectively likely true. This makes an attractive mix subjective and objective components in concept The component rationality attainable; preserves discipline external constraint.

In this paper I want to cast doubt on the claim that there is a legitimate process of reasoning best explanation which can serve as an alternative either straightforward inductive or combination and deductive reasoning. shall argue a) paradigmatic cases acceptable arguments must be considered enthymemes b) when suppressed premises are made explicit we have all need present argument employing both induction deduction.

Richard Fumerton's admirable defense of foundationalism depends upon some arguments against the possibility infinite regress justificatory reasons. One reason for preferring is, he claims, that infinitism (the view reasons are infinite) should be rejected.' I will try to show do not succeed. Since a key ingredient in his rejection is account inferential justification, offer critical comments about along way. There one important claim on which Fumerton and agree mentioned before begin discuss...

We would like to thank Michael Moore and Heidi for hosting a conference at the Institute Legal Philosophy University of Pennsylvania School Law which we had opportunity discuss many these issues.Many ideas put forth in this paper grew out dialogue that involves too participants name individually.WeÃare particularly grateful

Much of contemporary epistemology takes place in the shadow internalism/externalism debate. Its current on centre stage seems appropriate given dramatic revolution our thought about historical and epistemological inquiry that would seem to be forced by certain paradigm externalist views. But although controversy strike deep at heart fundamental issues, I am not it has been clearly defined. It me philosophers are choosing sides without a thorough understanding what respective views entail. In...

In this paper I want to evaluate the extent which reasoning best explanation provides a source of justification that will defeat traditional skeptical arguments. Unfortunately, however, so much contemporary epistemology takes place in shadow certain metaepistemological debates over nature justified belief. The approach one should take skepticism, for example, depends very on where stands now famous internalism/externalism controversy. It is also impossible adequately assess plausibility as...