Mette Termansen

ORCID: 0000-0003-4875-2810
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Agricultural risk and resilience
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Agricultural Economics and Policy
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Rural development and sustainability
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Agriculture and Rural Development Research

University of Copenhagen
2017-2024

Greenyard Fresh (United Kingdom)
2022

IT University of Copenhagen
2021

John Wiley & Sons (United States)
2019

Linde (United States)
2019

Aarhus University
2010-2018

Roskilde University
2017

World Agroforestry Centre
2014

University of Leeds
2007-2012

University of Aberdeen
2009

Monitoring Land Use Land-use decisions are based largely on agricultural market values. However, such can lead to losses of ecosystem services, as the provision wildlife habitat or recreational space, magnitude which may overwhelm any benefits. In a research project forming part UK National Ecosystem Assessment, Bateman et al. (p. 45 ) estimate value these net losses. Policies that recognize diversity and complexity natural environment target changes different areas so radically improve land...

10.1126/science.1234379 article EN Science 2013-07-04
Unai Pascual Patricia Balvanera Christopher B. Anderson Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer Mike Christie and 81 more David González-Jiménez Adrián Martín Christopher M. Raymond Mette Termansen Arild Vatn Simone Athayde Brigitte Baptiste David N. Barton Sander Jacobs Eszter Kelemen Ritesh Kumar Elena Lazos Tuyeni H. Mwampamba Barbara Nakangu Patrick O’Farrell Suneetha M. Subramanian Meine van Noordwijk SoEun Ahn Sacha Amaruzaman Ariane Amin Paola Arias‐Arévalo Gabriela Arroyo-Robles Mariana Cantú-Fernández Antonio Arjona Castro Victoria Contreras Alta De Vos Nicolas Dendoncker Stefanie Engel Uta Eser Daniel P. Faith Anna Filyushkina Houda Ghazi Erik Gómez‐Baggethun Rachelle K. Gould Louise Guibrunet Haripriya Gundimeda Thomas P. Hahn Zuzana V. Harmáčková Marcello Hernández‐Blanco Andra‐Ioana Horcea‐Milcu Mariaelena Huambachano Natalia Lutti Hummel Wicher Cem İskender Aydın Mine Işlar Ann‐Kathrin Koessler Jasper O. Kenter Marina Kosmus Heera Lee Beria Leimona Sharachchandra Lélé Dominic Lenzi Bosco Lliso Lelani Mannetti Juliana Merçon Ana Sofía Monroy‐Sais Nibedita Mukherjee Barbara Muraca Roldán Muradian Ranjini Murali Sara Nelson Gabriel R. Nemogá Jonas Ngouhouo Poufoun Aidin Niamir Emmanuel Nuesiri Tobias Ochieng Nyumba Begüm Özkaynak Ignacio Palomo Ram Pandit Agnieszka Pawłowska-Mainville Luciana Porter‐Bolland Martin F. Quaas Julian Rode Ricardo Rozzi Sonya Sachdeva Aibek Samakov Marije Schaafsma Nadia Sitas Paula Ungar Evonne Yiu Yuki Yoshida Egleé L. Zent

Abstract Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being 1,2 , addressing the global biodiversity crisis 3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature’s diverse values into decision-making. These include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose of nature are acted on. A better understanding how why is (under)valued more urgent than ever 4 . Notwithstanding...

10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9 article EN cc-by Nature 2023-08-09

With more than 60% of the land farmed, with vulnerable freshwater and marine environments, one most intensive, export-oriented livestock sectors in world, nitrogen (N) pollution pressure from Danish agriculture is severe. Consequently, a series policy action plans have been implemented since mid 1980s significant effects on surplus, efficiency environmental loadings N. This paper reviews policies actions taken their ability to mitigate reactive N (Nr) while maintaining agricultural...

10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/115002 article EN cc-by Environmental Research Letters 2014-11-01

Throughout the world, nitrogen (N) losses from intensive agricultural production may end up as undesirably high concentrations of nitrate in groundwater with a long-term impact on quality. This has human and environmental health consequences, due to use drinking water resource, causes eutrophication groundwater-dependent ecosystems such wetlands, rivers near-coastal areas. At national scale, measured trends Danish oxic last 70 years correlate well annual N surpluses. We also show that...

10.1038/s41598-017-07147-2 article EN cc-by Scientific Reports 2017-08-11

European agri-environmental policy has diverse and competing objectives. The Common Agricultural Policy been the main framework guiding Union (EU) its member states in design implementation of both mandatory voluntary instruments. Voluntary schemes, which were introduced 1990s, continue to play a central role meeting EU's environmental climate We find that achieving their objectives these schemes have faced problems including limited impact, low adoption by farmers, conflicts between income...

10.1086/718212 article EN Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2022-01-01

Fraser, E. D. G., A. J. Dougill, K. Hubacek, C. H. Quinn, Sendzimir, and M. Termansen. 2011. Assessing vulnerability to climate change in dryland livelihood systems: conceptual challenges interdisciplinary solutions. Ecology Society 16(3): 3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03402-160303

10.5751/es-03402-160303 article EN cc-by Ecology and Society 2011-01-01

Reed, M. S., K. Hubacek, A. Bonn, T. P. Burt, J. Holden, L. C. Stringer, N. Beharry-Borg, S. Buckmaster, D. Chapman, G. Clay, Cornell, Dougill, Evely, E. Fraser, Jin, B. Irvine, Kirkby, W. Kunin, Prell, H. Quinn, Slee, Stagl, Termansen, Thorp, and F. Worrall. 2013. Anticipating managing future trade-offs complementarities between ecosystem services. Ecology Society 18(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04924-180105

10.5751/es-04924-180105 article EN cc-by Ecology and Society 2013-01-01

Summary Eco‐schemes are set to play an important role in the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post‐2022 for delivery of environmental and climate benefits enhanced animal welfare. This article surveys current plans design eco‐schemes fifteen Union Member States. The number eco‐scheme measures be offered per country varies between 3 21, complexity level ambition individual quite heterogeneous. majority proposed either build upon components from greening obligations or stem...

10.1111/1746-692x.12352 article EN EuroChoices 2022-07-08

Backed by the Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 and 2030, numerous 'Mapping Assessment of Ecosystem Services' (MAES) projects have been completed in recent years member states European Union, with substantial results insights accumulated. The experience from different approaches is a valuable source information for developing assessment processes further, especially regard their uptake into policy more recently, ecosystem accounting. Systematic towards best practices lessons learned national...

10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101592 article EN cc-by Ecosystem Services 2024-01-01
Coming Soon ...