Login

Marie Lorans

ORCID: 0009-0009-0016-3516
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
A5034111386
Research Areas
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • History of Medical Practice
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Aarhus University Hospital
 2024

The University of Melbourne
 2017-2018

Aalborg University Hospital
 2016

 Somatic mutations of the coding microsatellites within the beta-2-microglobulin gene in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers and adenomas
OPENALEX - Publications 
Mark Clendenning Alvin Huang Harindra Jayasekara Marie Lorans Susan Preston and 13 more N. O’Callaghan Bernard J. Pope Finlay Macrae Ingrid Winship Roger L. Milne Graham G. Giles Dallas R. English John L. Hopper Aung Ko Win Mark A. Jenkins Melissa C. Southey Christophe Rosty Daniel D. Buchanan

10.1007/s10689-017-0013-y article EN Familial Cancer 2017-06-14
 Comparison of the ABC and ACMG systems for variant classification
OPENALEX - Publications 
Gunnar Houge Eirik Bratland Ingvild Aukrust Kristian Tveten Gabrielė Žukauskaitė and 43 more Ivona Sansović Alejandro Brea‐Fernández Karin Mayer Teija Paakkola Caoimhe McKenna William D. Wright Milica Keckarević Marković Dorte L. Lildballe M Konĕcný Thomas Smol Pia Alhopuro Estelle Arnaud Gouttenoire Katharina Obeid Албена Тодорова Milena Janković Joanna M. Lubieniecka Maja Stojiljković Marie‐Pierre Buisine Bjørn Ivar Haukanes Marie Lorans Hanno Roomere François Petit Maria K. Haanpää Claire Bénéteau Belén Pérez Dijana Plaseska‐Karanfilska Matthias Rath Nico Fuhrmann Bibiana I. Ferreira Coralea Stephanou Wenche Sjursen Aleš Maver Cécile Rouzier Adela Chiriţă-Emandi João Gonçalves Wei Cheng David Kuek Martin Broly Lonneke Haer‐Wigman Meow‐Keong Thong Sok-Kun Tae Michaela Hýblová Johan T. den Dunnen Andreas Laner

The ABC and ACMG variant classification systems were compared by asking mainly European clinical laboratories to classify variants in 10 challenging cases using both systems, state if the question would be reported as a relevant result or not measure of utility. In contrast system, system was made guide reporting but determine likelihood pathogenicity. Nevertheless, this comparison is justified since class determines many laboratories. Forty-three participated survey. seven cases, used did...

10.1038/s41431-024-01617-8 article EN cc-by European Journal of Human Genetics 2024-05-22
Coming Soon ...