Marco Colosio

ORCID: 0000-0001-9893-8109
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

National Research University Higher School of Economics
2015-2023

University of Padua
2014

Cognitive dissonance theory suggests that our preferences are modulated by the mere act of choosing. A choice between two similarly valued alternatives creates psychological tension (cognitive dissonance) is reduced a postdecisional reevaluation alternatives. We measured EEG human subjects during rest and free-choice paradigm. Our study demonstrates choices associated with stronger cognitive trigger larger negative frontocentral evoked response similar to error-related negativity, which has...

10.1523/jneurosci.3209-16.2017 article EN cc-by-nc-sa Journal of Neuroscience 2017-04-24

Abstract Humans can adapt their behavior by learning from the consequences of own actions or observing others. Gradual active action–outcome contingencies is accompanied a shift feedback- to response-based performance monitoring. This reflected complementary learning-related changes two ACC-driven ERP components, feedback-related negativity (FRN) and error-related (ERN), which have both been suggested signal events “worse than expected,” that is, negative prediction error. Although recent...

10.1162/jocn_a_00612 article EN Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2014-03-26

Cognitive dissonance theory suggests that our preferences are modulated by the mere act of choosing. According to cognitive theory, a choice between two similarly valued alternatives creates psychological tension (cognitive dissonance) is reduced post-decisional re-evaluation – spreading-of-alternatives effect chosen item being later evaluated more positively and rejected negatively. Previous neuroimaging studies indicated central role medial prefrontal cortex in dissonance. In this work, we...

10.2139/ssrn.2700656 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2015-01-01

Difficult choices between two equally attractive options result in a cognitive discrepancy dissonant cognitions such as preferences and actions often followed by sense of psychological discomfort known dissonance. It can lead to changes the desirability options: chosen option becomes more desirable, whereas rejected is devalued. Despite ample experimental evidence show this effect, neural mechanisms timing choice-induced preference are not fully understood.

10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104410 article EN cc-by Frontiers in Psychology 2023-12-18
Coming Soon ...