Rea Roje

ORCID: 0000-0002-0118-3115
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research

University of Split
2020-2023

Reports of questionable or detrimental research practices (QRPs) call into question the reliability scientific evidence and trustworthiness research. A critical component ecosystem is organization within which takes place. We conducted a survey to explore attitudes beliefs European American researchers about organisations in they work, their own towards integrity policies.

10.12688/f1000research.128733.1 preprint EN cc-by F1000Research 2023-02-16

Early career researchers (ECRs) play a crucial role in European and nationally funded research projects. They are at the forefront of planning, conducting, analysing, reporting research. As part SOPs4RI project by Commission, we, as ECRs members this project's consortium, were given opportunity to reflect on our role, obstacles, possible opportunities that we experienced. Although several steps have been already taken support early researchers, more concrete actions be pursued. In opinion,...

10.12688/openreseurope.15872.1 article EN cc-by Open Research Europe 2023-05-04

Research integrity (RI) guidance documents often lack sufficient details on handling specific RI issues causing the of harmonized approaches to and opening way research misconduct other detrimental practices. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are developed implemented by organizations for ensuring uniformity quality performed actions. This study aimed explore stakeholders' opinions SOPs RI, factors influencing implementation practices, ideas improvements in field. We conducted...

10.1080/08989621.2021.1989676 article EN cc-by Accountability in Research 2021-10-08

Early career researchers (ECRs) play a crucial role in European and nationally funded research projects. They are at the forefront of planning, conducting, analysing, reporting research. As part SOPs4RI project by Commission, we, as ECRs members this project’s consortium, were given opportunity to reflect on our role, obstacles, possible opportunities that we experienced. Although several steps have been already taken support early researchers, more concrete actions be pursued. In opinion,...

10.31222/osf.io/4uqvd preprint EN 2023-04-03

Abstract Education is important for fostering research integrity (RI). Although RI training increasingly provided, there little knowledge on how stakeholders view institutional education and policies. Following a constructivist approach, we present insights about stakeholders’ views experiences regarding institutions can develop implement We conducted thirty focus groups, engaging 147 participants in eight European countries. Using mixed deductive-inductive thematic analysis, identified five...

10.1093/scipol/scab077 article EN cc-by Science and Public Policy 2021-11-05

Structures for and practices of research integrity (RI) ethics (RE) differ among countries. This study analyzed the processes structures RI RE in Europe, following framework developed at World Conferences on Research Integrity. We present Country Report Cards 16 European countries, which included information structures, outcomes. While some countries are front-runners when it comes to RE, with well-established continually developing policies others just starting their journey RE. Although...

10.1080/08989621.2022.2163632 article EN cc-by Accountability in Research 2023-01-13

Supervisors, PhD candidates and research leaders are expected to be the primary persons responsible for maintaining a high integrity standards. However, institutions should support them in this effort, by promoting supervision leadership practices. Although it is clear that play crucial role this, there lack of institutional guidelines focusing on these topics. The development experience-based presented article consisted multi-step, iterative approach. We engaged 16 experts four workshops...

10.1080/08989621.2022.2112033 article EN Accountability in Research 2022-08-17

Various stakeholders in science have put research integrity high on their agenda. Among them, funders are prominently placed to foster by requiring that the organizations and individual researchers they support make an explicit commitment integrity. Moreover, need adopt appropriate practices themselves. To facilitate this, we recommend develop implement a Research Integrity Promotion Plan (RIPP). This Consensus View offers range of examples how already promoting integrity, distills 6 core...

10.1371/journal.pbio.3001773 article EN cc-by PLoS Biology 2022-08-19

Abstract Background One of the most important formats to disseminate evidence in health different populations are Cochrane Plain Language Summaries (PLSs). PLSs should be written a simplified language, easily understandable and providing clear message for consumer. The aim this study was examine extent which customized lay persons, specifically by conclusive, comprehensible, readable messages. Methods analyzed interventional studies ( N = 4360) English language published from 1995 2019. We...

10.1186/s12874-022-01721-7 article EN cc-by BMC Medical Research Methodology 2022-09-10

To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers’ behavior. Consequently, performing funding organizations (RPOs RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining concrete steps they will take RI. So far, there no consensus on which topics are important in policies. Therefore, we conducted a three round Delphi survey study explore by seeking from policy experts leaders. A total of 68 RPO 52 RFO...

10.31219/osf.io/msp7e preprint EN 2020-04-08

Education is important for fostering research integrity (RI). Although RI training increasingly provided, there little knowledge on how stakeholders view institutional education and policies. Following a constructivist approach, we present insights about stakeholders’ views experiences regarding institutions can develop implement We conducted thirty focus groups, engaging 147 participants in eight European countries. Using mixed deductive-inductive thematic analysis, identified five themes:...

10.31219/osf.io/p38nw preprint EN 2021-05-14

During health emergencies, leading healthcare organisations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), United States Centers (CDC), provide guidance public response. Previous studies have evaluated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) produced in response to epidemics or pandemics, yet few focused on recommendations. To address this gap, we assessed systems (HSG) by WHO, ECDC, CDC 2009 H1N1 COVID-19 pandemics.We extracted HSG...

10.7189/jogh.13.06050 article EN cc-by Journal of Global Health 2023-10-26

Reports of questionable or detrimental research practices (QRPs) call into question the reliability scientific evidence. The International Research Integrity Survey (IRIS) maps opinions and behaviors 2,300 researchers based in US 45,000 Europe (including UK, Norway, Iceland Switzerland)., how they assess their institutions’ support for integrity (RI). In comparison to US, European admit more QRPs are less confident maintaining high RI standards. many judge organization fall short best...

10.31222/osf.io/fgy7c preprint EN 2022-10-27

Publication and communication of research findings are important for the development science, since future scientific work relies builds on previous findings. However, this is not possible if researchers cannot trust published or principles integrity implemented in all phases process, including publication results (ALLEA 2017, NASEM 2017). This study aimed to explore authorship practices across different disciplinary fields identify areas related that require improvements. We used a...

10.15291/pubmet.3951 article EN PUBMET 2022-10-10
Coming Soon ...