A5071079615- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Quality and Safety in Healthcare
- Global Health and Surgery
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2020-2024
Amsterdam University Medical Centers
2020-2024
Public Health Institute
2022
Public Health Service of Amsterdam
2020-2022
The World Conferences on Research Integrity have produced significant collaborative conference statements including the Singapore Statement and more recently Hong Principles Researcher Assessment. 7th Conference (7WCRI) takes place in Cape Town from 29th May 2022 to 1st June 2022. theme of is Fostering an unequal world. We proposed statement through promotion fairness, equity diversity research collaborations contexts as major output for this conference. This paper serves introduce reader...
Abstract Education is important for fostering research integrity (RI). Although RI training increasingly provided, there little knowledge on how stakeholders view institutional education and policies. Following a constructivist approach, we present insights about stakeholders’ views experiences regarding institutions can develop implement We conducted thirty focus groups, engaging 147 participants in eight European countries. Using mixed deductive-inductive thematic analysis, identified five...
To foster research integrity (RI), institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. support to achieve this, we developed guidelines together with experts and administrators, exploring similarities differences in recommendations across groups, as well about using approaches other than formal training. We used an iterative co-creative process. conducted four half-day online co-creation workshops 16 participants total, which were informed by the...
Supervisors, PhD candidates and research leaders are expected to be the primary persons responsible for maintaining a high integrity standards. However, institutions should support them in this effort, by promoting supervision leadership practices. Although it is clear that play crucial role this, there lack of institutional guidelines focusing on these topics. The development experience-based presented article consisted multi-step, iterative approach. We engaged 16 experts four workshops...
Existing research integrity (RI) guideline development methods are limited in including various perspectives. While co-creation could help to address this, there is little information available researchers and practitioners on how, why when use for developing RI guidelines, nor what the outcomes of are. In this paper, we aim gap. First, discuss how can be used development, based our experience guidelines. We elaborate steps preparation aims design; participant sensitization; organizing...
Research integrity (RI) is crucial for trustworthy research. Rules are important in setting RI standards and improving research practice, but they can lead to increased bureaucracy; without commensurate commitment amongst researchers toward RI, unlikely improve practices. In this paper, we explore how combine rules fostering RI. institutions govern using markets (using incentives), bureaucracies rules), network processes (through agreements). Based on Habermas' Theory of Communicative...
Various stakeholders in science have put research integrity high on their agenda. Among them, funders are prominently placed to foster by requiring that the organizations and individual researchers they support make an explicit commitment integrity. Moreover, need adopt appropriate practices themselves. To facilitate this, we recommend develop implement a Research Integrity Promotion Plan (RIPP). This Consensus View offers range of examples how already promoting integrity, distills 6 core...
Research Funding Organizations (RFOs) play an important role in promoting research integrity (RI). Not only do they allocate resources to institutions and researchers, but also set monitor standards their funded projects. In spite of crucial role, there is a paucity guidance on how RFOs can promote integrity. As part the EU-Funded SOPs4RI project, we aimed address this gap by co-creating guidelines help RI, engaging diverse group stakeholders. Based Delphi survey, reviews evidence...
Teaching responsible conduct of research (RCR) to PhD students is crucial for fostering practice. In this paper, we show how the use Moral Case Deliberation-a case reflection method used in Amsterdam UMC RCR course-is particularity valuable address three goals education: (1) making aware of, and internalize, principles values, (2) supporting on good personal daily practice, (3) developing students' dialogical attitude skills so that they can deliberate issues when arise. What makes relevant...
Existing research integrity (RI) guideline development methods are limited in including various perspectives. While co-creation could help to address this, there is little information available researchers and practitioners on how, why when use for developing RI guidelines, nor what the outcomes of are. In this paper, we aim gap. First, discuss how can be used development, based our experience guidelines. We elaborate steps preparation aims design; participant sensitization; organizing...
To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers’ behavior. Consequently, performing funding organizations (RPOs RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining concrete steps they will take RI. So far, there no consensus on which topics are important in policies. Therefore, we conducted a three round Delphi survey study explore by seeking from policy experts leaders. A total of 68 RPO 52 RFO...
Background: To foster research integrity (RI), institutions should develop a continuous approach to RI education, addressing various target groups. support achieve this, we developed education guidelines together with experts and administrators, exploring similarities differences in recommendations across groups, as well about using approaches other than formal training. Methods: We used an iterative co-creative process. After the literature, conducted four half-day online co-creation...
Education is important for fostering research integrity (RI). Although RI training increasingly provided, there little knowledge on how stakeholders view institutional education and policies. Following a constructivist approach, we present insights about stakeholders’ views experiences regarding institutions can develop implement We conducted thirty focus groups, engaging 147 participants in eight European countries. Using mixed deductive-inductive thematic analysis, identified five themes:...
Dominant initiatives focusing on research integrity are changing the landscape by leading to development and application of rules, guidelines standards that researchers across borders have abide by. There is an increasing attention within these importance fairness for conducting responsible research. However, some stakeholders view as separate, sometimes even conflicting with, integrity. To make sense accounts, in this paper, I explore relationship between fairness. argue dominant currently...
Research integrity (RI) is crucial for trustworthy research. Rules are important in setting RI standards and improving research practice, but they can lead to increased bureaucracy; without commensurate commitment amongst researchers toward RI, unlikely improve practices. In this paper, we explore how combine rules fostering RI. institutions govern using markets (using incentives), bureaucracies rules), network processes (through agreements). Based on Habermas’ Theory of Communicative...