Andy Stirling

ORCID: 0000-0002-0650-431X
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Global Energy Security and Policy
  • Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
  • International Development and Aid
  • Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Nuclear Issues and Defense
  • Regional Development and Policy
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Nuclear and radioactivity studies
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Risk and Safety Analysis

University of Sussex
2016-2025

Duke University Health System
2020-2024

Duke University
2023

Australasian College for Emergency Medicine
2020

Ajuntament de L’Hospitalet
2020

Italian Society of Physiotherapy
2020

Launceston General Hospital
2019

Diplomatic Academy of Vienna
2016

Arizona State University
2015

University of Dundee
2014

Discursive deference in the governance of science and technology is rebalancing from expert analysis toward participatory deliberation. Linear, scientistic conceptions innovation are giving ground to more plural, socially situated understandings. Yet, growing recognition social agency choice countered by persistently deterministic notions technological progress. This article addresses this increasingly stark disjuncture. Distinguishing between “appraisal” “commitment” choice, it highlights...

10.1177/0162243907311265 article EN Science Technology & Human Values 2007-11-12

This paper addresses the scope for more integrated general analysis of diversity in science, technology and society. It proposes a framework recognizing three necessary but individually insufficient properties diversity. Based on 10 quality criteria, it suggests quantitative non-parametric heuristic. allows systematic exploration under different perspectives, including divergent conceptions relevant attributes contrasting weightings properties. is shown how this heuristic may be used to...

10.1098/rsif.2007.0213 article EN Journal of The Royal Society Interface 2007-02-27

Technology-focused literature on socio-technical transitions shares some of the complex systems sensibilities social-ecological research.We contend that sharing lessons between these areas study must attend particularly to common governance challenges confront both approaches.Here, we focus critical experience arising from reactions a transition management approach governing sustainable transformations.Questions over who governs, whose system framings count, and sustainability gets...

10.5751/es-03218-150111 article EN cc-by Ecology and Society 2010-01-01

10.1038/4681029a article EN Nature 2010-12-01

Leach, M., J. Rockström, P. Raskin, I. Scoones, A. C. Stirling, Smith, Thompson, E. Millstone, Ely, Arond, Folke, and Olsson. 2012. Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecology Society 17(2): 11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04933-170211

10.5751/es-04933-170211 article EN cc-by Ecology and Society 2012-01-01

This paper addresses key implications in momentous current global energy choices – both for social science and society. Energy can be over-used as a lens viewing processes. But it is nonetheless of profound importance. Understanding possible ‘sustainable energy’ transformations requires attention to many tricky issues theory: around agency structure the interplay power, contingency practice. These factors are much shaping knowledges normativities supposedly driving transformation, they...

10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001 article EN cc-by Energy Research & Social Science 2014-03-01

Linking environmental sustainability with poverty reduction and social justice, making science technology work for the poor, have become central practical, political moral challenges of our times. These must be met in a world rapid, interconnected change environments, societies economies, globalised, fragmented governance arrangements. Yet despite growing international attention investment, policy attempts often fail. Why is this, what can done about it? How might we understand address...

10.1108/meq.2010.08321eae.002 article EN Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal 2010-08-10

Despite three decades of political efforts and a wealth research on the causes catastrophic impacts climate change, global carbon dioxide emissions have continued to rise are 60% higher today than they were in 1990. Exploring this through nine thematic lenses—covering issues governance, fossil fuel industry, geopolitics, economics, mitigation modeling, energy systems, inequity, lifestyles, social imaginaries—draws out multifaceted reasons for our collective failure bend curve. However,...

10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-011104 article EN Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2021-06-29

The field of science and technology studies (STS) has introduced developed a "sociotechnical" perspective that been taken up by many disciplines areas inquiry. aims objectives this study are threefold: to interrogate which sociotechnical concepts or tools from STS useful at better understanding energy-related social science, reflect on prominent themes topics within those approaches, identify current research gaps directions for the future. To do so, builds companion project, systematic...

10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617 article EN cc-by Energy Research & Social Science 2020-09-07

10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.005 article EN Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2011-05-09

The paper critically reviews the work of David Collingridge in light contemporary concerns about responsibility and accountability innovation, public engagement with science technology, role scientific expertise technology policy. Given continued interest his thoughts on ‘social control technology’, ‘dilemma control’, this attention is both timely overdue. illuminates a mismatch between prevalence citations to Collingridge’s dilemma literature responsible depth arguments. By considering...

10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.012 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Research Policy 2017-10-11

The need for policy makers to understand science and scientists processes is widely recognised. However, the science-policy relationship sometimes difficult occasionally dysfunctional; it also increasingly visible, because must deal with contentious issues, or itself becomes a matter of public controversy, both. We suggest that identifying key unanswered questions on between will catalyse focus research in this field. To identify these questions, collaborative procedure was employed 52...

10.1371/journal.pone.0031824 article EN cc-by PLoS ONE 2012-03-09

The contribution makes use of a sociotechnical imaginaries (STI) framework to expose crucial but neglected governance issues in areas key relevance sustainability transformations such as energy systems. It explores how the STI concept can contribute understanding (T2S) by illustrating their multidimensionality and temporality. takes its starting point 'co-productionist' view illuminating collective visions desirable (or resisted) environmental futures limit or enable political imagination...

10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.010 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2021-04-01
Coming Soon ...