A5001384753- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Research Data Management Practices
- Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
- Electronic Health Records Systems
- Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Business Strategies and Innovation
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Library Science and Information Systems
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Evolution and Science Education
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Web and Library Services
- Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Information Science and Libraries
- Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Data Quality and Management
University of Surrey
2015
Digital Research Alliance of Canada
2009
BioMed Central (United Kingdom)
2002-2005
ING Direct
2003
Faculty of 1000 (United Kingdom)
2003
Cobham (United Kingdom)
2001
There is an urgent need to improve the infrastructure supporting reuse of scholarly data. A diverse set stakeholders-representing academia, industry, funding agencies, and publishers-have come together design jointly endorse a concise measureable principles that we refer as FAIR Data Principles. The intent these may act guideline for those wishing enhance reusability their data holdings. Distinct from peer initiatives focus on human scholar, Principles put specific emphasis enhancing ability...
The FAIR Data Principles propose that all scholarly output should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable.As a set of guiding principles, expressing only the kinds behaviours researchers expect from contemporary data resources, how principles manifest in reality was largely open to interpretation.As support for has spread, so breadth these interpretations.In observing this creeping spread interpretation, several original authors felt it now appropriate revisit Principles,...
As the amount of scholarly communication increases, it is increasingly difficult for specific core scientific statements to be found, connected and curated.Additionally, redundancy these in multiple fora makes determine attribution, quality provenance.To tackle challenges, Concept Web Alliance has promoted notion nanopublications (core with associated context).In this document, we present a model along Named Graph/RDF serialization model.Importantly, defined completely using already existing...
ABSTRACT In assessing the role that organizations of scientists with publishing activities – such as scholarly societies can or should play in furthering science and practice their chosen fields, they face a dilemma: primarily be fund‐raising for other disciplines, using publications to bring necessary money, promoters efficient communication use more directly end instance, by embracing ‘open access‘.
ABSTRACT Faculty of 1000 ( www.facultyof1000.com ) is a new on‐line literature awareness and assessment service research papers, on the basis selections by 1400 world's top biologists, that combines metrics with judgement. The offers systematic comprehensive form post‐publication peer review focuses best papers regardless journal in which they are published. It now possible to draw some conclusions about how this meets needs scientists, organizations fund them, practice. In addition,...
Presented here is a proposal for the academic publishing industry to get actively involved in formulation of protocols and standards that make published scientific research material machine-readable order facilitate data be findable, accessible, interoperable, re-usable (FAIR). Given importance traditional journal publications scholarly communication worldwide, active involvement publishers advancing more routine creation reuse FAIR highly desired.
Abstract Peer review is almost universally seen as the crux of scientific journal publishing. The role peer reviewers (1) to help avoid unnecessary errors in published article, and (2) judge publication-worthiness (in that arranges for review). This happens. Sometimes. But notion rather vague, since most it anonymous, very difficult – arguably impossible researchers know if articles they read have been reliably reviewed which criteria used come decision accept publication. On top that,...
Formal peer-reviewed publication of research results is seen as a necessity in science. But also, open access to these increasingly necessity. The two are sometimes incompatible, but they not. we have get away from the conventional roles copyright and subscriptions system order capitalise on possibilities publishing service, with result.
Full and unimpeded access (Open Access) to science literature is needed. It not provided by the traditional subscription-based publishing model. Instead of criticizing Open Access attacking its proponents, publishers should make imaginative innovative efforts build their businesses around needs customers rather than desire continue a model that may be lucrative, but no longer satisfactory or society.
In order to do justice the collective and universal nature of science, free exchange research results is nothing less than imperative. This can only mean open access these results. Before internet, physical limitations o
Data and narrative are both important for scientific discourse. They ‘united’ in the mind of scientist-author, yet current publishing process favours at expense data, making it hard to recreate experiments, intuitively link relevant data points outside article question, or indeed find associated sets. Utopia Documents helps solve this problem by enabling readers articles follow leads without need flip (and particularly search) through other systems, so enhances their ability gain a deeper...
AbstractFull and unimpeded access (Open Access) to science literature is needed. It not provided by the traditional subscription-based publishing model. Instead of criticizing Open Access attacking its proponents, publishers should make imaginative innovative efforts build their businesses around needs customers rather than desire continue a model that may be lucrative, but no longer satisfactory or society.
Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community has been digitised and can be accessed in full on this website. All content is freely available an open-access basis. was published between 1988 2011. In 2012, journal retitled now as Insights: UKSG journal.