A5101707732- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Online Learning and Analytics
- Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- E-Learning and Knowledge Management
- Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
University of California, San Diego
2020-2024
Xuzhou Medical College
2023
In recent years, MOOC has become one of the most popular trends in global education. However, completion courses is still a great challenge for MOOCs. Thus, evaluation MOOCs importance to online The goal this research evaluate interfaces localized on PC platforms, specifically, explore role culture interface design and its user experience (UX). Three studies were conducted our research. study 1, through an interview, we selected two (Chinese University Coursera), typical tasks, main factors...
Much of what people do is motivated by a concern with social evaluation. We argue that the process figuring out others value and making effective use this information presents significant cognitive challenges. These challenges include reasoning about relevance different forms inferences mental lives others. They also modifying one’s behavior in light whatever personal qualities appear to be valued an effort appeal audiences. foundations many important skills needed meet these are already...
Abstract According to moral pluralism theory, people practice reasoning based on several fundamental dimensions, including honesty and loyalty. As individuals navigate increasingly complex social worlds over development, they may face the dilemmas where collides with In current study, adolescents (15‐ 18‐year‐olds, N = 203) in a western, multicultural Canadian city read involving protagonist learning that an athlete cheated sports event. We manipulated relationship between cheater (best...
When people are asked to recommend individuals they care about, often grapple with conflicts regarding the level of honesty should maintain when being truthful could potentially hinder those individuals' chances receiving beneficial opportunities. In current study, we examined how adolescents evaluate based on respond such dilemmas, a focus it affects judgments interpersonal and epistemic trustworthiness. We tested sample high school students in southwestern United States (N = 78; M
Abstract Do people believe in historical myths because they are manipulated by coalitional recruiters, or it is their interests to do so? The target article gives somewhat conflicting explanations. We propose that the audiences of socially rather than epistemically motivated – and propagate as a way signaling commitments.
How to distribute resources in a fair way is fundamental source of conflict human societies. A central dilemma that people begin grapple with during childhood the extent which individuals should be rewarded based on merit at expense equality. The current study examined children's reasoning about this by testing whether they are sensitive information motives highly productive when determining receive extra compensation. Across two studies, children (6- 11-year-olds, total N = 143) judged high...