Anne M. Scheel

ORCID: 0000-0002-6627-0746
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Data Analysis and Archiving
  • Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Libraries and Information Services

Utrecht University
2022-2025

Eindhoven University of Technology
2017-2022

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychoanalyse, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Tiefenpsychologie
2020

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie e.V. (DGPs)
2020

Leibniz Institute for Psychology
2020

Universität Trier
2020

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
2016-2020

Technical University of Munich
2020

Goethe University Frankfurt
2020

Arizona State University
2018

Psychologists must be able to test both for the presence of an effect and absence effect. In addition testing against zero, researchers can use two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure equivalence reject a smallest size interest (SESOI). The TOST used determine if observed is surprisingly small, given that true at least as extreme SESOI exists. We explain range approaches in psychological science provide detailed examples how should performed reported. Equivalence are important extension...

10.1177/2515245918770963 article EN cc-by Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2018-06-01

Replication—an important, uncommon, and misunderstood practice—is gaining appreciation in psychology. Achieving replicability is important for making research progress. If findings are not replicable, then prediction theory development stifled. interrogation of their meaning validity can advance knowledge. Assessing be productive generating testing hypotheses by actively confronting current understandings to identify weaknesses spur innovation. For psychology, the 2010s might characterized...

10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157 article EN Annual Review of Psychology 2021-10-19

Selectively publishing results that support the tested hypotheses (“positive” results) distorts available evidence for scientific claims. For past decade, psychological scientists have been increasingly concerned about degree of such distortion in their literature. A new publication format has developed to prevent selective reporting: In Registered Reports (RRs), peer review and decision publish take place before are known. We compared published RRs ( N = 71 as November 2018) with a random...

10.1177/25152459211007467 article EN cc-by-nc Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2021-04-01

For almost half a century, Paul Meehl educated psychologists about how the mindless use of null-hypothesis significance tests made research on theories in social sciences basically uninterpretable. In response to replication crisis, reforms psychology have focused formalizing procedures for testing hypotheses. These were necessary and influential. However, as an unexpected consequence, psychological scientists begun realize that they may not be ready test Forcing researchers prematurely...

10.1177/1745691620966795 article EN cc-by Perspectives on Psychological Science 2020-12-16

Researchers often conclude an effect is absent when a null-hypothesis significance test yields nonsignificant p value. However, it neither logically nor statistically correct to hypothesis not significant. We present two methods evaluate the presence or absence of effects: Equivalence testing (based on frequentist statistics) and Bayes factors Bayesian statistics). In four examples from gerontology literature, we illustrate different ways specify alternative models that can be used reject...

10.1093/geronb/gby065 article EN The Journals of Gerontology Series B 2018-05-25

Selectively publishing results that support the tested hypotheses ('positive' results) distorts available evidence for scientific claims. For past decade, psychological scientists have been increasingly concerned about degree of such distortion in their literature. A new publication format has developed to prevent selective reporting: In Registered Reports, peer review and decision publish take place before are known. We compared published Reports (N = 71 as November 2018) with a random...

10.31234/osf.io/p6e9c preprint EN 2020-02-05

Psychologists must be able to test both for the presence of an effect and absence effect. In addition testing against zero, researchers can use Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure equivalence reject a smallest size interest (SESOI). TOST used determine if observed is surprisingly small, given that true at least as large SESOI exists. We explain range approaches in psychological science, provide detailed examples how tests should performed reported. Equivalence are important extension...

10.31234/osf.io/v3zkt preprint EN 2017-11-17

For almost half a century, Paul Meehl educated psychologists about how the mindless use of null-hypothesis significance tests made research on theories in social sciences basically uninterpretable (Meehl, 1990). In response to replication crisis, reforms psychology have focused formalising procedures for testing hypotheses. These were necessary and impactful. However, as an unexpected consequence, begun realise that they may not be ready test Forcing researchers prematurely hypotheses before...

10.31234/osf.io/vekpu preprint EN 2020-09-06

Replication, an important, uncommon, and misunderstood practice, is gaining appreciation in psychology. Achieving replicability important for making research progress. If findings are not replicable, then prediction theory development stifled. interrogation of their meaning validity can advance knowledge. Assessing be productive generating testing hypotheses by actively confronting current understanding to identify weaknesses spur innovation. For psychology, the 2010s might characterized as...

10.31234/osf.io/ksfvq preprint EN 2021-02-09

Abstract Psychology's replication crisis is typically conceptualized as the insight that published literature contains a worrying amount of unreplicable, false‐positive findings. At same time, meta‐scientific attempts to assess in more detail have reported substantial difficulties identifying unambiguous definitions scientific claims articles and determining how they are connected presented evidence. I argue most so critically underspecified empirically evaluate them doomed failure—they not...

10.1002/icd.2295 article EN cc-by-nc Infant and Child Development 2022-01-01

The use of journal impact factors and other metric indicators research productivity, such as the h-index, has been heavily criticized for being invalid assessment individual researchers fueling a detrimental “publish or perish” culture. Multiple initiatives call developing alternatives to existing metrics that better reflect quality (instead quantity) in assessment. This report, written by task force established German Psychological Society, proposes how responsible could be done field...

10.31234/osf.io/rgh5b preprint EN 2022-11-25

Researchers often conclude an effect is absent when a null-hypothesis significance test yields non-significant p-value. However, it not logically nor statistically correct to hypothesis significant. We present two methods evaluate the presence or absence of effects: Equivalence testing (based on frequentist statistics) and Bayes factors Bayesian statistics). In four examples from gerontology literature we illustrate different ways specify alternative models that can be used reject meaningful...

10.31234/osf.io/qtzwr preprint EN 2018-02-26

Meta-analyses are an important tool to evaluate the literature. It is essential that meta-analyses can easily be reproduced allow researchers impact of subjective choices on meta-analytic effect sizes, but also update as new data comes in, or novel statistical techniques (for example correct for publication bias) developed. Research in medicine has revealed often cannot reproduced. In this project, we examined reproducibility psychology by reproducing twenty published meta-analyses....

10.31222/osf.io/xfbjf preprint EN 2017-03-31

OPINION article Front. Psychol., 05 December 2017Sec. Developmental Psychology Volume 8 - 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02089

10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02089 article EN cc-by Frontiers in Psychology 2017-12-05

Providing access to research data collected as part of scientific publications and publicly funded projects is now regarded a central aspect an open transparent practice increasingly being called for by funding institutions journals. To this end, researchers should strive comply with the so-called FAIR principles (of management), that is, be findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable. Systematic management supports these goals and, at same time, makes it possible achieve them efficiently....

10.31234/osf.io/24ncs preprint EN 2020-09-10

Social science has a ‘context sensitivity’ problem: the people that we study, and situations they engage in, are so complex variable predicting how will think, feel, behave in given situation is very challenging. Even when able to make such predictions, it often unclear accurate be if some feature of studied subjects and/or changes. This limits utility our research for application policy, as ‘contextual factors’ might change conclusions unknown. It time address this context sensitivity...

10.31234/osf.io/j8b9a preprint EN 2018-11-01

In a summary of recent discussions about the role direct replications in psychological science, Zwaan, Etz, Lucas, and Donnellan (2017; henceforth ZELD) argue that should be more mainstream, discuss six common objections to replication studies. We believe debate importance research is essentially driven by disagreements value studies best way allocate limited resources. suggest decision theory framework (Wald, 1950) can provide tool for researchers (a) evaluate costs benefits order determine...

10.31234/osf.io/c8akj preprint EN 2018-01-17

Psychology’s replication crisis is typically conceptualised as the insight that published literature contains a worrying amount of unreplicable, false-positive findings. At same time, meta-scientific attempts to assess in more detail have reported substantial difficulties identifying unambiguous definitions scientific claims articles and determining how they are connected presented evidence. I argue most so critically underspecified empirically evaluate them doomed failure — not even wrong....

10.31234/osf.io/8w2sd preprint EN 2021-12-01

Präambel: Viele Diskussionspunkte um Open Data lassen sich grob in zwei Perspektiven einteilen. (A) die Qualitätsperspektive, bzw. Gemeinwohlperspektive: Wie können wir gute Wissenschaft machen und echtes Wissen generieren? Was aus der aktuellen Replikationskrise lernen Zukunft besser machen? Die andere Perspektive könnte man als (B) individuell-strategische bezeichnen: bedeuten neuen Forschungspraktiken -anforderungen für individuellen Karrieren von Forscherinnen Forschern, insbesondere dem...

10.1026/1612-5010/a000217 article DE Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie 2017-10-01
Coming Soon ...