Arild Vatn

ORCID: 0000-0002-9092-8712
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Agricultural Economics and Policy
  • Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Economic theories and models
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Global Energy and Sustainability Research

Norwegian University of Life Sciences
2014-2024

CICERO Center for International Climate Research
2021-2023

Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia
2011

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
2009

The Research Council of Norway
1994-2005

Posten (Norway)
1998-2004

Statistics Norway
1997

Agricultural & Applied Economics Association
1994

Madison Group (United States)
1994

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018 article EN Ecological Economics 2009-12-24

Abstract In this commentary we critically discuss the suitability of payments for ecosystem services and most important challenges they face. While such instruments can play a role in improving environmental governance, argue that over‐reliance on as win‐win solutions might lead to ineffective outcomes, similar earlier experience with integrated conservation development projects. Our objective is raise awareness, particularly among policy makers practitioners, about limitations encourage...

10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00309.x article EN Conservation Letters 2012-11-26

10.1006/jeem.1994.1008 article EN Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1994-03-01
Unai Pascual Patricia Balvanera Christopher B. Anderson Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer Mike Christie and 81 more David González-Jiménez Adrián Martín Christopher M. Raymond Mette Termansen Arild Vatn Simone Athayde Brigitte Baptiste David N. Barton Sander Jacobs Eszter Kelemen Ritesh Kumar Elena Lazos Tuyeni H. Mwampamba Barbara Nakangu Patrick O’Farrell Suneetha M. Subramanian Meine van Noordwijk SoEun Ahn Sacha Amaruzaman Ariane Amin Paola Arias‐Arévalo Gabriela Arroyo-Robles Mariana Cantú-Fernández Antonio Arjona Castro Victoria Contreras Alta De Vos Nicolas Dendoncker Stefanie Engel Uta Eser Daniel P. Faith Anna Filyushkina Houda Ghazi Erik Gómez‐Baggethun Rachelle K. Gould Louise Guibrunet Haripriya Gundimeda Thomas P. Hahn Zuzana V. Harmáčková Marcello Hernández‐Blanco Andra‐Ioana Horcea‐Milcu Mariaelena Huambachano Natalia Lutti Hummel Wicher Cem İskender Aydın Mine Işlar Ann‐Kathrin Koessler Jasper O. Kenter Marina Kosmus Heera Lee Beria Leimona Sharachchandra Lélé Dominic Lenzi Bosco Lliso Lelani Mannetti Juliana Merçon Ana Sofía Monroy‐Sais Nibedita Mukherjee Barbara Muraca Roldán Muradian Ranjini Murali Sara Nelson Gabriel R. Nemogá Jonas Ngouhouo Poufoun Aidin Niamir Emmanuel Nuesiri Tobias Ochieng Nyumba Begüm Özkaynak Ignacio Palomo Ram Pandit Agnieszka Pawłowska-Mainville Luciana Porter‐Bolland Martin F. Quaas Julian Rode Ricardo Rozzi Sonya Sachdeva Aibek Samakov Marije Schaafsma Nadia Sitas Paula Ungar Evonne Yiu Yuki Yoshida Egleé L. Zent

Abstract Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being 1,2 , addressing the global biodiversity crisis 3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature’s diverse values into decision-making. These include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose of nature are acted on. A better understanding how why is (under)valued more urgent than ever 4 . Notwithstanding...

10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9 article EN cc-by Nature 2023-08-09

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.005 article EN Ecological Economics 2009-05-08

Achieving the intertwined goals of justice and sustainability requires transformative changes to meaningfully engage diverse perspectives. Therefore, scholars policymakers need new ways recognising addressing nature's multiple values across cultures, disciplines other knowledge traditions. By reviewing academic publications, policy documents Indigenous local community sources, we developed an inclusive typology clarify value concepts guide their consideration in decisions. Through case...

10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101301 article EN cc-by Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2023-09-19

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.001 article EN Ecological Economics 2005-02-21

Journal Article Multifunctional agriculture: some consequences for international trade regimes Get access Arild Vatn Agricultural University of Norway, Aas, Norway Corresponding author: Vatn, Department Economics and Social Sciences, Norway. E‐mail: arild.vatn@ios.nlh.no Search other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar European Review Economics, Volume 29, Issue 3, 1 August 2002, Pages 309–327, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/29.3.309 Published: 01 2002

10.1093/eurrag/29.3.309 article EN European Review of Agricultural Economics 2002-07-01

Abstract Policy related transaction costs (TCs) is an important issue when evaluating different policy options. However, TCs are often not taken into account in evaluations, but may be as for efficiency the direct production costs. Different policies result TCs, and main aim of this article to explore possible reasons these differences. We compare level 12 agricultural measures Norway, we analyze causes differences along three dimensions: asset specificity, frequency, point application. At...

10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00172.x article EN Agricultural Economics 2007-01-01

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.017 article EN Ecological Economics 2014-09-05

Developing institutions to handle human-environment interactions well is important.In relation that, the theory of resource regimes, and themes fit, interplay, scale-as originating not least in work Oran Young-are core.His very impressive.At same time we observe two sets issues where think further development needed.The first relates ontological underpinning Young's conceptual framework.The second set concerns definitions relationships between concepts scale.Regarding former, emphasize...

10.5751/es-05022-170412 article EN cc-by Ecology and Society 2012-01-01

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.010 article EN Ecological Economics 2018-03-19

Values play a significant role in decision-making, especially regarding nature. Decisions impact people and nature complex ways understanding which values are prioritised, left out is an important task for improving the equity effectiveness of decision-making. Based on work done IPBES Assessment, this paper develops framework to support analyses how decision-making influences as well whose get prioritised. The used analyse key areas environmental policy: a) present model protection market...

10.1098/rstb.2022.0315 article EN Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 2024-04-21

<i>Economic valuation of the environment is disputed, in part, due to number anomalies. Reactions these anomalies have included adding new auxiliary hypotheses core model or dismissing whole undertaking. This paper takes a third route, and uses observations made studies improve choice theory. The covers information problem, issue preference formation, underlines role social sphere defining what becomes individually rational. While findings not simplify theory, they may help us become more...

10.2307/3147141 article EN Land Economics 2004-02-01

10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.015 article EN Land Use Policy 2014-07-12

This paper addresses problems related to transferring market concepts non-market domains. More specifically it is about fallacies following from the use of commodity concept in environmental valuation studies. First all, standard practice tends misconstrue ethical aspects choices by forcing them into becoming ordinary trade-off problems. Second, perspective ignores important technical interdependencies within environment and relational character goods. These are all properties that have made...

10.3197/096327100129342173 article EN Environmental Values 2000-11-01

10.1007/bf02441375 article EN Environmental and Resource Economics 1997-03-01

10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.011 article EN The Journal of Socio-Economics 2008-08-04
Coming Soon ...