Tuyeni H. Mwampamba

ORCID: 0000-0003-4635-5774
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • International Maritime Law Issues
  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
  • Indigenous Studies and Ecology

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
2015-2025

Universidad de Morelia
2016-2023

Sokoine University of Agriculture
2023

Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud
2022

Birds Canada
2021

Instituto de Ecología
2019

Universität Greifswald
2019

University of Groningen
2019

Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo
2019

Centro Agronomico Tropical de Investigacion y Ensenanza Catie
2019

Unai Pascual Patricia Balvanera Christopher B. Anderson Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer Mike Christie and 81 more David González-Jiménez Adrián Martín Christopher M. Raymond Mette Termansen Arild Vatn Simone Athayde Brigitte Baptiste David N. Barton Sander Jacobs Eszter Kelemen Ritesh Kumar Elena Lazos Tuyeni H. Mwampamba Barbara Nakangu Patrick O’Farrell Suneetha M. Subramanian Meine van Noordwijk SoEun Ahn Sacha Amaruzaman Ariane Amin Paola Arias‐Arévalo Gabriela Arroyo-Robles Mariana Cantú-Fernández Antonio Arjona Castro Victoria Contreras Alta De Vos Nicolas Dendoncker Stefanie Engel Uta Eser Daniel P. Faith Anna Filyushkina Houda Ghazi Erik Gómez‐Baggethun Rachelle K. Gould Louise Guibrunet Haripriya Gundimeda Thomas P. Hahn Zuzana V. Harmáčková Marcello Hernández‐Blanco Andra‐Ioana Horcea‐Milcu Mariaelena Huambachano Natalia Lutti Hummel Wicher Cem İskender Aydın Mine Işlar Ann‐Kathrin Koessler Jasper O. Kenter Marina Kosmus Heera Lee Beria Leimona Sharachchandra Lélé Dominic Lenzi Bosco Lliso Lelani Mannetti Juliana Merçon Ana Sofía Monroy‐Sais Nibedita Mukherjee Barbara Muraca Roldán Muradian Ranjini Murali Sara Nelson Gabriel R. Nemogá Jonas Ngouhouo Poufoun Aidin Niamir Emmanuel Nuesiri Tobias Ochieng Nyumba Begüm Özkaynak Ignacio Palomo Ram Pandit Agnieszka Pawłowska-Mainville Luciana Porter‐Bolland Martin F. Quaas Julian Rode Ricardo Rozzi Sonya Sachdeva Aibek Samakov Marije Schaafsma Nadia Sitas Paula Ungar Evonne Yiu Yuki Yoshida Egleé L. Zent

Abstract Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being 1,2 , addressing the global biodiversity crisis 3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature’s diverse values into decision-making. These include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose of nature are acted on. A better understanding how why is (under)valued more urgent than ever 4 . Notwithstanding...

10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9 article EN cc-by Nature 2023-08-09

The ability to monitor changes in biodiversity, and their societal impact, is critical conserving species managing ecosystems. While emerging technologies increase the breadth reach of data acquisition, monitoring efforts are still spatially temporally fragmented, taxonomically biased. Appropriate long-term information remains therefore limited. Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) aims provide a general framework for biodiversity support decision-makers....

10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.005 article EN cc-by Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2017-12-01

King, E., J. Cavender-Bares, P. Balvanera, T. H. Mwampamba, and S. Polasky. 2015. Trade-offs in ecosystem services varying stakeholder preferences: evaluating conflicts, obstacles, opportunities. Ecology Society 20(3): 25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07822-200325

10.5751/es-07822-200325 article EN cc-by Ecology and Society 2015-01-01

10.1016/j.esd.2012.10.006 article EN Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development 2012-11-22

Abstract Impacts of climate change require that society urgently develops ways to reduce amounts carbon in the atmosphere. Tropical forests present an important opportunity, as they take up and store large carbon. It is often suggested with high biodiversity have stocks rates uptake. Evidence is, however, scattered across geographic areas scales, it remains unclear whether just a co‐benefit or also requirement for maintenance Here, we perform quantitative review empirical studies analyzed...

10.1111/btp.12453 article EN Biotropica 2017-06-14

Abstract: Evidence suggests that the involvement of local people in conservation work increases a project's chances success. Involving citizen scientists research, however, raises questions about data quality. As tool to better assess potential participants for projects, we developed knowledge gradient, K, along which community members occupy different positions on basis their experience with and research subject. This gradient can be used refine citizen–science concept allow researchers...

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01740.x article ES Conservation Biology 2011-10-03

This paper critically examines the current political context in which valuation studies of nature are undertaken. It challenges belief that somehow, more and technically better will drive societal change toward just sustainable futures. Instead, we argue proposed practices risk to continue overrepresent values those who hold power dominate space, perpetuate discrimination views nondominant stakeholders. In tackling this politically sensitive issue, define a typology valuations, making...

10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101345 article EN cc-by Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2023-09-19

The paper reviews a number of challenges associated with reducing degradation and its related emissions through national approaches to REDD+ under UNFCCC policy. It proposes that in many countries, it may the short run be easier deal kinds result from locally driven community over-exploitation forest for livelihoods, than selective logging or fire control. Such is low-level, but chronic, experienced over very large areas. Community management programmes tend not only reduced degradation,...

10.1186/1750-0680-6-16 article EN cc-by Carbon Balance and Management 2011-12-01

The Values Assessment (VA) of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that while a wide range valuation methods exist to include nature's values in diverse decision-making contexts, uptake these remains limited. Building VA, this paper reviews five critical steps evaluation project or policy proposals can improve inclusion decisions. Furthermore, improving practice requires guidelines utilise quality criteria for nature ensure balance...

10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101344 article EN cc-by Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2023-09-19

10.1016/j.esd.2013.02.007 article EN Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development 2013-03-21
Coming Soon ...