Charles C. Y. Wang

ORCID: 0000-0003-0604-9684
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
  • Corporate Governance and Law
  • Private Equity and Venture Capital
  • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • State Capitalism and Financial Governance
  • Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Corporate Insolvency and Governance
  • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Economic theories and models
  • Family Business Performance and Succession
  • Art History and Market Analysis
  • Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Community Development and Social Impact
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Harvard University
2014-2023

European Corporate Governance Institute
2010-2023

Harvard University Press
2010-2021

Stanford University
2010-2011

Tel Aviv University
2010-2011

National Bureau of Economic Research
2010-2011

We explain when and how staggered difference-in-differences regression estimators, commonly applied to assess the impact of policy changes, are biased. These biases likely be relevant for a large portion research settings in finance, accounting, law that rely on treatment timing, can result Type-I Type-II errors. summarize three alternative estimators developed econometrics literature addressing these biases, including their differences tradeoffs. apply re-examine prior published results...

10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.01.004 article EN cc-by Journal of Financial Economics 2022-02-22

10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.01.006 article EN Journal of Accounting and Economics 2013-02-04

We explain when and how staggered difference-in-differences regression estimators, commonly applied to assess the impact of policy changes, are biased. These biases likely be relevant for a large portion research settings in finance, accounting, law that rely on treatment timing, can result Type-I Type-II errors. summarize three alternative estimators developed econometrics literature addressing these biases, including their differences tradeoffs. apply re-examine prior published results...

10.2139/ssrn.3794018 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2021-01-01

Abstract We introduce a parsimonious framework for choosing among alternative expected-return proxies (ERPs) when estimating treatment effects. By comparing ERPs’ measurement error variances in the cross-section and time series, we provide new evidence on relative performance of firm-level ERPs nominated by recent studies. Generally, “implied-costs-of-capital” metrics perform best whereas “characteristic-based” cross-section. Factor-based ERPs, even latest renditions, poorly. revisit four...

10.1093/rfs/hhaa066 article EN Review of Financial Studies 2020-06-04

Firms with central boards of directors earn superior risk-adjusted stock returns. A long (short) position in the most (least) firms earns average annual returns 4.68%. also experience higher future return-on-assets growth and more positive analyst forecast errors. Return prediction, growth, errors are concentrated among high opportunity or confronting adverse circumstances, consistent boardroom connections mattering for standing to benefit from information resources exchanged through...

10.2139/ssrn.1651407 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2012-01-01

10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.008 article EN Journal of Corporate Finance 2013-11-13

In the presence of managerial short-termism and asymmetric information about skill effort provision, firms may opportunistically shift earnings from uncertain to more certain times. We document that report negative discretionary accruals when financial markets are less their future prospects. Stock-price responses surprises moderated firm-level uncertainty is high, consistent with performance being attributed luck rather than effort, which can create incentives toward lower-uncertainty...

10.2139/ssrn.2746091 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2016-01-01

In an influential study, Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick (2003) show that a trading strategy based on index of 24 governance provisions (G-Index) would have earned abnormal returns during the 1991-1999 period, this intriguing finding has attracted much attention ever since it was reported. We identified correlation between G-Index (as well as E-Index matter most) did not exist subsequent period 2000-2008, we investigate what could explain both existence such 1990s its disappearance. provide...

10.2139/ssrn.1876605 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2011-01-01

We introduce a parsimonious framework for choosing among alternative expected-return proxies (ERPs) when estimating treatment effects. By comparing ERPs' measurement-error variances in the cross-section and time series, we provide new evidence on relative performance of firm-level ERPs nominated by recent studies. Generally, "implied-costs-of-capital" metrics perform best series; while "characteristic-based" cross-section. Factor-based ERPs, even latest renditions, poorly. revisit four prior...

10.2139/ssrn.1653940 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2011-01-01

Journal Article Short-Termism and Capital Flows Get access Jesse M Fried, Fried Harvard Law School Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Charles C Y Wang Business Send correspondence to C.Y. Wang, School, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163; telephone: 617-496-9633. E-mail: cwang@hbs.edu. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Volume 8, Issue 1, March 2019, Pages 207–233, https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfy011 Published: 06 December 2018

10.1093/rcfs/cfy011 article EN The Review of Corporate Finance Studies 2018-12-05

In July 2020, the European Commission published "Study on directors' duties and sustainable corporate governance" by EY. The Report purports to find evidence of debilitating short-termism in EU governance recommends many changes support governance. this paper, we point out deep flaws Report's analysis. We recently submitted content paper response Commission's call for feedback. First, defines problem as one pernicious that damages environment, climate, stakeholders. But mistakenly conflates...

10.2139/ssrn.3711652 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2020-01-01

10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.04.025 article EN Journal of Financial Economics 2021-04-30

In an important and influential work, Gompers, Ishii, Metrick (2003) show that a trading strategy based on index of 24 governance provisions (G-Index) would have earned abnormal returns during the 1991-1999 period, this intriguing finding has attracted much attention ever since it was reported.We G-Index (as well as E-Index subset six matter most) no longer associated with period 2000-2008, or any subperiods within it, we provide evidence consistent hypothesis disappearance...

10.3386/w15912 preprint EN 2010-04-01

The well-established negative correlation between staggered boards (SBs) and firm value could be due to SBs leading lower or a reflection of low-value firms' greater propensity maintain SBs. We analyze the causal question using natural experiment involving two Delaware court rulings ― separated by several weeks going in opposite directions that affected antitakeover force contribute long-standing debate on presenting empirical evidence consistent with market viewing as for firms.

10.2139/ssrn.2141410 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2012-01-01

Despite their popularity as proxies of expected returns, the implied cost capital's (ICC) measurement error properties are relatively unknown. Through an in-depth analysis a popular implementation ICCs by Gebhardt, Lee, and Swaminathan (2001) (GLS), I show that ICC errors can be not only nonrandom persistent, but also associated with firms' risk or growth characteristics, implying regressions likely confounded spurious correlations. Moreover, document biases in GLS' driven analysts'...

10.2139/ssrn.1967706 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2012-01-01

10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.06.004 article EN Journal of Financial Economics 2017-06-27

ABSTRACT Staggered boards (SBs) are one of the most potent common entrenchment devices, and their value effects considerably debated. We study SBs' on firm value, managerial behavior, investor composition using a quasi‐experimental setting: 1990 law that imposed SBs all Massachusetts‐incorporated firms. find relative to matched control group companies, for treated companies led an increase in Tobin's Q, investment capital expenditures R&D, patents, higher‐quality patented innovations,...

10.1111/1911-3846.12709 article EN Contemporary Accounting Research 2021-06-25
Coming Soon ...