Clive E Adams

ORCID: 0000-0003-1628-4020
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

University of Nottingham
2016-2025

Institute of Mental Health
2015-2025

Cochrane
2013-2025

Acadia University
2022

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
2017

Queen's University
2016

Kingston Health Sciences Centre
2016

University of Central Lancashire
2016

Keele University
2016

Creative Research Enterprises (United States)
2016

Background A recent review suggested an association between using unpublished scales in clinical trials and finding significant results. Aims To determine whether such existed schizophrenia trials. Method Three hundred were randomly selected from the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register. All comparisons treatment groups control rating identified. The publication status of each scale was determined claims a effect recorded. Results Trials more likely to report that superior when used make...

10.1192/bjp.176.3.249 article EN The British Journal of Psychiatry 2000-03-01

Aims and Method To estimate the proportion of attrition at which results drug trials for people with schizophrenia lose enough credibility to become mistrusted by relevant groups stakeholders. A piloted questionnaire was sent 128 local clinicians, 100 researchers 104 service users carers. Results We received biggest number responses from user carer group ( n =81, 76%); 43% clinicians 32% responded. All three suggested that follow-up rate a 12-week trial should be around 70–75% credible....

10.1192/pb.bp.108.021949 article EN cc-by Psychiatric Bulletin 2009-06-30

<h3>Abstract</h3> <b>Objective</b> To provide a comprehensive survey of the content and quality intervention studies relevant to treatment schizophrenia. <b>Design</b> Data were extracted from 2000 trials on Cochrane Schizophrenia Group9s register. <b>Main outcome measures</b> Type date publication, country origin, language, size study, setting, participant group, interventions, outcomes, study. <b>Results</b> Hospital based drug undertaken in United States dominant sample (54%). Generally,...

10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1181 article EN BMJ 1998-10-31

Background The pharmacological management of violence in people with psychiatric disorders is under-researched. Aims To compare interventions commonly used for controlling agitation or serious disorders. Method We randomised 200 to receive intramuscular lorazepam (4 mg) haloperidol (10 plus promethazine (25–50 mg mix). Results At blinded assessments 4 h later (99.5% follow-up), equal numbers both groups (96%) were tranquil asleep. However, 76% given the haloperidol-promethazine mix asleep...

10.1192/bjp.185.1.63 article EN The British Journal of Psychiatry 2004-06-30

<b>Objective</b> To determine whether haloperidol alone results in swifter and safer tranquillisation sedation than plus promethazine. <b>Design</b> Pragmatic randomised open trial (January-July 2004). <b>Setting</b> Psychiatric emergency room, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. <b>Participants</b> 316 patients who needed urgent intramuscular because of agitation, dangerous behaviour, or both. <b>Interventions</b> Open treatment with 5-10 mg promethazine up to 50 mg; doses were at the discretion...

10.1136/bmj.39339.448819.ae article EN BMJ 2007-10-22

Valid reviews of the effects mental health care depend on identifying as high a proportion possible relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To investigate sensitivity and precision both MEDLINE hand-searching for RCTs in health, 12 journals specializing indexed by National Library Medicine (NLM) were searched years 1971, 1976, 1981, 1986 1991. The hand-search was 94% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 93-95%), but it had only 7% (CI 6-8%). optimal search 52% 48-56%) 59% 55-63%). Of reports...

10.1017/s0033291700027896 article EN Psychological Medicine 1994-08-01
Coming Soon ...