Jane Buckley

ORCID: 0000-0003-4206-2341
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Community Health and Development
  • Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Service-Learning and Community Engagement
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Educational Methods and Teacher Development
  • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Advanced Optical Network Technologies
  • demographic modeling and climate adaptation
  • Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • ICT Impact and Policies
  • Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Cognitive Computing and Networks
  • Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods

Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida
2024

John Wiley & Sons (United States)
2021

Cornell University
2015

BT Group (United Kingdom)
1995

BT Research
1993

Dalhousie University
1983

Evaluative thinking (ET) is an increasingly important topic in the field of evaluation, particularly among people involved evaluation capacity building (ECB). Yet it a construct need clarification, especially if to be meaningfully discussed, promoted, and researched. To that end, we propose ET essentially critical applied contexts evaluation. We argue ECB, more generally, would benefit from explicit transparent appropriation well-established concepts teaching strategies derived long history...

10.1177/1098214015581706 article EN American Journal of Evaluation 2015-05-11

Abstract In this paper, we introduce Relational Systems Evaluation (RSE), the focal topic of volume. RSE is a framework for program planning and evaluation that theoretically grounded, empirically tested focused on building capacity. Theoretically, rooted in an evolutionary approach to development informed by systems thinking. The application involves collaborative partnership pairing evaluators or researchers with practitioners, use modeling tools, emphasis nurturing Evaluative Thinking...

10.1002/ev.20444 article EN publisher-specific-oa New Directions for Evaluation 2021-03-01

The purpose of this paper is to offer both theoretical and practical support evaluation professionals preparing facilitate the utilization phase with a program or organization team. Systems Evaluation Protocol for Participatory Data Use (SEPPDU) presented here rooted in partnership approach therefore designed as way structure conversations thinking around data interpretation decision making. SEPPDU three main parts: (a) summarizing results, (b) interpreting (c) planning action. This...

10.1177/10982140241234835 article EN American Journal of Evaluation 2024-03-22

Abstract Purpose: To illustrate the utility of CYP450 genotyping to guide clinical psychopharmacological treatment decisions and minimize or avoid harmful costly adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Data sources: DNA was extracted from a whole blood sample case study subject tested for gene polymorphisms in CLIA certified Laboratory Personalized Health at Genomas, Inc. Clinical data were obtained patient records clinician observations. Conclusions: We present which ascertainment multiple isoenzyme...

10.1111/j.1745-7599.2011.00640.x article EN Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2011-07-25

Abstract International community development involves complex, dynamic processes. Evaluation capacity building (ECB) designed to promote evaluative thinking among practitioners can foster more complexity‐aware monitoring and evaluation for learning adaptive management. Instead of simply executing technical processes based on predetermined plans, be “knowledge workers” who use collaboration, learning, adaptation. In this chapter, framed in the context United States Agency Development's...

10.1002/ev.20323 article EN New Directions for Evaluation 2018-04-16

Background: Evaluative thinking has emerged as a key construct in evaluation, especially for evaluation practitioners and researchers interested capacity building (ECB). Yet, despite increasing calls more research on and, specifically, ECB, until recently little empirical inquiry the dimensions of evaluative been conducted.
 Purpose: To address that lack, purpose study presented this paper is to refine by exploring its underlying ascertain internal consistency an instrument developed...

10.56645/jmde.v16i34.591 article EN cc-by-nc Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation 2020-04-10

Abstract This paper explores the nature and importance of relationship between Evaluation Capacity Builders (ECBers) their program partner(s) in context Partnerships for Advancing Character (PACE) Project. PACE, a 3‐year initiative supported by John Templeton Foundation, offered unique opportunity to initiate, structure, support, observe evaluation partnerships an professional team over 15 months. In this paper, after reviewing pertinent Building (ECB) adult education literature, we report...

10.1002/ev.20445 article EN New Directions for Evaluation 2021-03-01

Abstract In this paper, we present a comprehensive integrative approach to evaluation planning based on Relational Systems Evaluation (RSE). We describe the major implementation approaches and tools resources that support in RSE embodied Protocol (SEP), step‐by‐step guide tasks every should address. The SEP provides both conceptual framework for thinking about set of specific methods expand awareness influences multiple parts complex systems. is implemented through partnership approach,...

10.1002/ev.20443 article EN publisher-specific-oa New Directions for Evaluation 2021-03-01

Abstract Evaluation capacity building (ECB) is still an emerging area of study in the field evaluation. The purpose ECB to assist program practitioners with implementing higher‐quality evaluation; however, we need better tools and resources effectively assess efforts. Existing measures typically depend on self‐report as opposed assessing artifacts training. Among few non‐self‐report that support assessment efforts are Relational Systems rubrics designed evaluate logic models, pathway...

10.1002/ev.20611 article EN cc-by-nc-nd New Directions for Evaluation 2024-09-01

Abstract In this paper, we present empirical findings from a mixed‐methods study of an Evaluation Capacity Building (ECB) initiative called the Partnerships for Advancing Character program (PACE) Project that applied Relational Systems (RSE) approach. We focused especially on how participation in partnership‐based ECB is associated with changes attitudes and behaviors related to evaluation capacity Evaluative Thinking. used repeated measures design semi‐structured interviews surveys examine...

10.1002/ev.20447 article EN New Directions for Evaluation 2021-03-01

Abstract This paper presents the results of a study program participants’ responses to an innovative project called Partnerships for Advancing Character Evaluation (PACE), which operationalized Relational Systems (RSE) approach Capacity Building (ECB). We examine tools and concepts from PACE resonated with participants were sustained, why. Analysis participant interviews yielded sixteen distinct value propositions that they associated training. Importantly, number them extend beyond...

10.1002/ev.20442 article EN New Directions for Evaluation 2021-03-01

Abstract In this paper, we present six case studies that illustrate the application of Systems Evaluation Protocol (SEP) in different real‐world implementation conditions. The SEP is a step‐by‐step guide for how to implement Relational (RSE), accounting complex factors inherent larger systems within which given program embedded. We discuss specific steps used and products developed each study project, including an emphasis on decisions were made include particular elements contexts. cases...

10.1002/ev.20448 article EN New Directions for Evaluation 2021-03-01

This paper explores some aspects of future intelligent networks. The latest trends including network generalisation and intelligence are discussed. concepts the access node universal signalling introduced. (4 pages)

10.1049/ic:19950703 article EN 1995-01-01

The UK National Code Change in 1995 will mark the latest chapter short history of telephone numbering. J.F. Buckley, BT, reviews origins this change, and explores some principles behind choice numbering schemes.

10.1049/ir:19920148 article EN IEE Review 1992-01-01
Coming Soon ...