A5016323200- Research Data Management Practices
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research
- Competency Development and Evaluation
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Information Architecture and Usability
- Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
- International Science and Diplomacy
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Team Dynamics and Performance
- Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
- Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
- Big Data Technologies and Applications
- Business and Management Studies
- Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Platelet Disorders and Treatments
- Academic Writing and Publishing
State and University Library
2015-2024
University of Southern Denmark
2010-2023
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
2020
Royal Danish Library
2009-2013
University of Technology Sydney
2008
This paper presents some indications to the existence of a citation advantage related sharing data using astrophysics as case. Through bibliometric analyses we find for astrophysical papers in core journals. The arises indexed are associated with by bibliographical links, and consists receiving on average significantly more citations per year, than do not links data.
Abstract We present here evidence for the existence of a citation advantage within astrophysics papers that link to data. Using simple measures based on publication data from NASA Astrophysics Data System we find with links receiving average significantly more citations per paper than without Furthermore, using INSPEC and Web Science databases investigate whether either an experimental or theoretical nature display different behavior.
A central question concerning scientific publishing is how researchers select journals to which they submit their work, since the choice of publication channel can make or break researchers. The gold-digger mentality developed by some publishers created so-called predatory that accept manuscripts for a fee with little peer review. literature claims mainly from low-ranked universities in developing countries publish journals. We decided challenge this claim using University Southern Denmark...
Abstract Nations the world over are increasingly turning to quantitative performance-based metrics evaluate quality of research outputs, as these abundant and provide an easy measure ranking research. In 2010, Danish Ministry Science Higher Education followed this trend began portioning out a percentage available funding according how many outputs each university produces. Not all eligible: only those published in curated list academic journals publishers, so-called BFI list, included. The...
We present here evidence for the existence of a citation advantage within astrophysics papers that link to data. Using simple measures based on publication data from NASA Astrophysics Data System we find with links receiving average significantly more citations per paper than without Furthermore, using INSPEC and Web Science databases investigate whether either an experimental or theoretical nature display different behavior.
We present the development and preliminary validation of a new person-centered indicator that we propose is named “OADO” after its target concepts: Open Access (OA), Data (OD) Outreach (OO). The comprised two factors: research factor indicating degree OA articles OD in research; communication OO activities which researcher has participated. stipulate weighted version this indicator, Weighted-OADO, can be used to assess openness researchers relation their peers from own discipline,...