Maria Mammen

ORCID: 0000-0003-4722-280X
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Values and Moral Education
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
2019-2024

LMU Klinikum
2023

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
2015-2017

University of Manchester
2017

In the context of joint decision-making, we investigated whether preschoolers alter informativeness their justifications depending on common ground that they share with partner. Pairs 3- and 5-year-olds (N = 146) were introduced to a novel animal unique characteristics (e.g., eating rocks). condition, children learned about together. one-expert one it, other was naïve. two-experts it separately. Later, pairs had decide together 3 items might need. Both age groups referred in more 2...

10.1037/dev0000089 article EN Developmental Psychology 2015-12-21

Identifying the underlying psychological and social factors of distancing is crucial to foster preventive behavior during a pandemic effectively. We investigated relative contribution self-focused (fear infection, fear punishment) other-focused (moral judgment, moral identity, empathy for unspecific others, loved ones) in an online study Germany (N = 246) while COVID-19 was climaxing. Importantly, other-oriented were related beyond self-oriented factors. Moral judgment ones remained dominant...

10.1177/1359105320980793 article EN cc-by Journal of Health Psychology 2020-12-10

Children encounter moral norms in several different social contexts. Often it is hierarchically structured interactions with parents or other adults, but sometimes more symmetrically peers. Our question was whether children's discussions of differ these two Consequently, we had 4- and 6-year-old children (N = 72) reason about dilemmas their mothers Both age groups opposed partner's views explicitly justified own often peers than mothers. Mothers adapted to the cognitive levels (e.g., focused...

10.1037/dev0000807 article EN Developmental Psychology 2019-09-12

Moral justifications work, when they do, by invoking values that are shared in the common ground of interlocutors. We asked 3- and 5-year-old peer dyads (N = 144) to identify punish norm transgressors. In moral condition, transgressor violated a (e.g., stealing); social rules she/he context-specific rule placing yellow toy green box, instead box). Children both age groups justified their punishment condition mostly referring "He must put toys box"). contrast, simply observed fact stole"),...

10.1037/dev0000424 article EN Developmental Psychology 2017-10-23

The moral self-concept (MSC) is an early indicator of how children view themselves as agents. It has been proposed that important feature established (SC) sufficient coherency in one views oneself. Furthermore, the MSC expected to develop into a multidimensional, hierarchical construct which stable over time. Investigating these theoretical hypotheses, this study aims take three aspects account get deeper insight when and first emerges: emergence coherency, stability, differentiated...

10.1037/dev0001673 article EN Developmental Psychology 2024-01-22

Moral reasoning is a central aspect of morality, and its acquisition therefore moral development. Children acquire norms through social interactions with others. Yet, the process that subserves appreciation remains vastly understudied. In this article we present theoretical framework on nature development conceives human morality in terms communication. Following framework, argue for closer, systematic investigation children's complements predominant approach adult-led interviews examining...

10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101336 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Cognitive Development 2023-04-01

There are sometimes legitimate reasons for breaking a promise when circumstances change. We investigated 3- and 5-year-old German children’s understanding of in prosocial (helping someone else) selfish (playing with conditions. In Study 1 (n = 80, 50% girls), preschoolers initially kept their own all When they eventually broke promise, 3-year-olds’ justifications mostly referenced salient events, whereas 5-year-olds also social norms. 2 65, 49% preferred others’ promise-breaking more than...

10.31234/osf.io/t82nw preprint EN 2021-11-03
Coming Soon ...