A5016860783- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Radiology practices and education
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Data Quality and Management
- Empathy and Medical Education
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Innlandet Hospital Trust
2012-2021
University of Oslo
2013-2017
University Hospital of Geneva
2016
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
2014
Hellenic Center for Disease Control & Prevention
2014
University of Milan
2014
Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten
2013
University of Geneva
2013
Decision aids can help shared decision making, but most have been hard to produce, onerous update, and are not being used widely. <b>Thomas Agoritsas colleagues</b> explore why describe a new electronic model that holds promise of more useful for clinicians patients use together at the point care
Healthcare decision makers face challenges when using guidelines, including understanding the quality of evidence or values and preferences upon which recommendations are made, often not clear. GRADE is a systematic approach towards assessing strength in healthcare. also gives advice on how to go from decisions. It has been developed address weaknesses other grading systems now widely used internationally. The Developing Evaluating Communication Strategies Support Informed Decisions Practice...
Most countries exclude human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients from organ donation because of concerns regarding donor-derived HIV transmission. The Swiss Federal Act on Transplantation has allowed transplantation between HIV-positive donors and recipients since 2007. We report the successful liver an donor to recipient. Both recipient had been treated for many years with antiretroviral therapy harbored multidrug-resistant viruses. Five months after transplantation, viremia...
The objective of the study was to develop and test feasibility a framework patient-important practical issues.Guidelines shared decision-making tools help facilitate discussions about outcomes care alternatives, but typically ignore issues patients consider when implementing into their daily routines. Using grounded theory, in HealthTalk.org registry Option Grids were identified categorized framework. We integrated MAGIC authoring publication platform digitally structured appraised its use...
Abstract Background Tools for shared decision-making (e.g. decision aids) are intended to support health care professionals and patients engaged in clinical encounters involving decision-making. However, aids hard produce, onerous update. Consequently, they often do not reflect best current evidence, show limited uptake practice. In response, we initiated the Sharing Evidence Inform Treatment decisions (SHARE-IT) project. Our goal was develop refine a new generation of that generically...
Introduction. Mild elevation of transaminase may be observed in anorexia nervosa, but acute liver injury is uncommon. A complex programmed cell death response to starvation, called autophagy, has been described experimental and human studies. Case Presentation. 24-year-old woman suffering from nervosa was hospitalized for severe malnutrition. At admission, there were biological signs no electrolytic imbalance. After having ruled out the most common causes injury, patient carefully refed. As...
To investigate practicing physicians' preferences, perceived usefulness and understanding of a new multilayered guideline presentation format-compared to standard format-as well as conceptual trustworthy concepts.Participants attended standardised lecture in which they were presented with clinical scenario randomised view recommendation format or after answered multiple-choice questions using clickers. Both groups also asked about concepts.Mandatory educational lectures 7 non-academic...
Understanding the provenance of clinical guidelines is important for both practitioners and researchers as it allows deeper understanding provided recommendations could potentially provide a basis updating guidelines.Often such incomplete or unavailable.We describe prototype multi-signal pipeline reconstructing show preliminary results dependencies between documents in context associated documents.
There are now over 140 tools/programs that can assist in developing systematic reviews or clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). It is currently unclear which tools used by reviewers and CPG developers, development processes they for, what facilitators barriers to their use exist.
Safe and effective disease diagnosis treatment requires that health personnel can access the best evidence, preferably through reliable clinical practice guidelines. Most guidelines have methodological weaknesses, suboptimal reporting formats, frequently fail to update content. New standards developed by US Institute of Medicine Guidelines International Network Systems for Trustworthy offer better opportunities success in development guidelines, but also increase demand competence,...