- Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Water resources management and optimization
- Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Heavy metals in environment
- Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
- Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
- Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
- Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
- Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Odor and Emission Control Technologies
- Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
- Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
- Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Environmental Policies and Emissions
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology
2020-2024
ELSA
2014-2021
Institut de l'Environnement et Recherches Agricoles
2015-2021
ITAP - Technologies et Méthodes pour les Agricultures de demain
2015-2019
Université de Montpellier
2017-2019
Institut Agro Montpellier
2017-2019
Ingénierie des Agropolymères et Technologies Emergentes
2016-2019
Institut dal Dicziunari Rumantsch Grischun
2014-2018
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
2017
Technical University of Denmark
2008-2015
This paper addresses the need for a globally regionalized method life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), integrating multiple state-of-the-art developments as well damages on water and carbon areas of concern within consistent LCIA framework. method, named IMPACT World+, is update 2002+, LUCAS, EDIP methods. first presents World+ novelties results then analyzes spatial variability each category. With we propose midpoint-damage framework with four distinct complementary viewpoints to present an...
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVFeatureNEXTBuilding a Model Based on Scientific Consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Chemicals: The Search Harmony and ParsimonyRecognizing the value different modeling approaches helped to build consensus when developing recommended model assessing impacts chemical emissions from product's life cycle.Michael Z. Hauschild, Mark Huijbregts, Olivier Jolliet, Matt Macleod, Manuele Margni, Dik van de Meent, Ralph K. Rosenbaum, Thomas E. McKone, View...
Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is a lively field of research, and data models are continuously improved in terms pathways covered, reliability, spatial detail. However, many these advancements scattered throughout the scientific literature, making it difficult for practitioners to apply new models. Here, we present LC-IMPACT method that provides characterization factors at damage level 11 categories related three areas protection (human health, ecosystem quality, natural resources)....
Abstract Purpose Pesticides are applied to agricultural fields optimise crop yield and their global use is substantial. Their consideration in life cycle assessment (LCA) affected by important inconsistencies between the emission inventory impact phases of LCA. A clear definition delineation product system model (life inventory—LCI, technosphere) natural environment assessment—LCIA, ecosphere) missing could be established via consensus building. Methods workshop held 2013 Glasgow, UK, had...
Summary Inventory data and characterization factors in life cycle assessment (LCA) contain considerable uncertainty. The most common method of parameter uncertainty propagation to the impact scores is Monte Carlo simulation, which remains a resource‐intensive option—probably one reasons why not regular step LCA. An analytical approach based on Taylor series expansion constitutes an effective means overcome drawbacks method. This project aimed test real case study, resulting was compared with...
Human exposure to indoor pollutant concentrations is receiving increasing interest in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). We address this issue by incorporating an compartment into the USEtox model, as well providing recommended parameter values for households four different regions of world differing geographically, economically, and socially. With these values, intake fractions comparative toxicity potentials emissions dwellings air tightness levels were calculated. The resulting vary 2 orders...