A5045912789- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Dental materials and restorations
- Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
- Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
- Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
- Iron Metabolism and Disorders
- Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
- Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Dental Trauma and Treatments
- Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
- Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Nail Diseases and Treatments
Veritas (United States)
2019-2022
Newcastle University
2020
Ministry of Health
2005-2019
EBSCO Industries (United States)
2018
University of Bahrain
2008-2017
Cochrane
2005-2016
State University of Applied Sciences in Elbląg
2016
Cochrane
2005-2015
AMA International University
2011-2012
Salmaniya Medical Complex
2006
Synthesis of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review can summarize the effects individual outcomes and provide numerical answers about effectiveness interventions. Filtering searches is time consuming, no single method fulfills principal requirements speed with accuracy. Automation reviews driven by necessity to expedite availability current best evidence for policy clinical decision-making. We developed Rayyan ( http://rayyan.qcri.org ), free web mobile app, that...
To assess the reporting quality of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews (SR) in orthodontics to compare (PRISMA score) with methodological (AMSTAR criteria).Systematic (n = 109) published between January 2000 July 2011 five leading orthodontic journals were identified included. The included was assessed by two authors accordance PRISMA guidelines. Each article assigned a cumulative grade based on fulfillment applicable criteria, an overall percentage score assigned. Descriptive...
The aims of this study were to assess and compare the methodological quality Cochrane non-Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) published in leading orthodontic journals Database Systematic Reviews (CDSR) using AMSTAR prevalence meta-analysis both review types. A literature search was undertaken identify SRs that consisted hand-searching five major [American Journal Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics, Angle Orthodontist, European Orthodontics, Craniofacial Research (February 2002 July 2011)]...