A5020382581- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Ethics in Business and Education
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Sports Analytics and Performance
- Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Housing Market and Economics
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
University of Dayton
2019-2023
ORCID
2023
Temple University
2013-2018
Twenty-nine teams involving 61 analysts used the same data set to address research question: whether soccer referees are more likely give red cards dark-skin-toned players than light-skin-toned players. Analytic approaches varied widely across teams, and estimated effect sizes ranged from 0.89 2.93 ( Mdn = 1.31) in odds-ratio units. Twenty (69%) found a statistically significant positive effect, 9 (31%) did not observe relationship. Overall, 29 different analyses 21 unique combinations of...
Twenty-nine teams involving 61 analysts used the same dataset to address research question: whether soccer referees are more likely give red cards dark skin toned players than light players. Analytic approaches varied widely across teams, and estimated effect sizes ranged from 0.89 2.93 in odds ratio units, with a median of 1.31. Twenty (69%) found statistically significant positive nine (31%) observed non-significant relationship. Overall 29 different analyses 21 unique combinations...
Abstract Anchoring has been shown to influence numeric judgments in various domains, including preferential judgment tasks. Whereas many studies and a recent Many Labs project have robust effects classic anchoring tasks, of on had inconsistent results. In this paper, we investigate the replicability robustness willingness-to-pay, which is widely used measure for consumer preference. We employ combination approaches, aggregating data from previous also contributing additional replication...
Abstract Individuals are known to make systematically different decisions when the probabilities in risky choice problems described or experienced. This difference, as description–experience gap, has been reliably replicated across several studies using binary gambles. Yet little is whether these differences exist more complex gambles absence of rare outcomes, and they associated with systematic use decision heuristics strategies formats. Using three‐outcome mixed gambles, we found that...
Much research on moral judgment is centered dilemmas in which deontological perspectives (i.e., emphasizing rules, individual rights and duties) are conflict with utilitarian judgements following the greater good defined through consequences). A central finding of this field Greene et al. showed that psychological situational factors (e.g., intent agent, or physical contact between agent victim) play an important role people’s use versus considerations when making decisions. As their study...
Ariely, Loewenstein, and Prelec (2003) showed that people’s judgments of a product’s value are strongly systematically influenced by considering numbers (or “anchors”) which should be irrelevant to their valuations. However, subsequent studies inconsistent results while using different experimental protocols. To bridge the gap between conflicting prior studies, we replicated anchoring effect in product valuations also varying protocol. We examined whether type number (Social Security vs....
Conceptual combination is a fundamental human cognitive ability by which people can experience infinite thinking artfully combining finite knowledge. For example, one instantly combine “cactus” and “fish” together as “prickly fish” even if has never previously heard of “cactus fish.” Although two major combinatorial types—property relational combinations—have been identified, the underlying processes each remain elusive. This study investigates asymmetric processing mechanisms property...
Anchoring effects have been shown to influence preferential judgments (e.g., willingness-to- pay), as well other types of numeric judgments. However, it is unclear whether anchoring are restricted judgments, or if the carry over choices. Through a series experiments and within-study meta-analyses, we found that on can induce willingness-to-pay reversals between items, but without necessarily affecting choices involving same items. Our findings highlight important distinctions choice, which...
In many business and managerial decisions, accurate estimation of numeric attributes is crucial, but such estimates are often biased by a previously considered value—a cognitive bias known as the anchoring effect. This paper provides an overview current state literature on effect, with particular focus its applications in settings. First, we summarize different processes that may underlie which include conversational inferences, insufficient adjustment from anchor value, selective...