Michael Zehetleitner

ORCID: 0000-0003-3363-2680
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
  • Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation

Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
2015-2024

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
2009-2018

LMU Klinikum
2009

Unplanned optional stopping rules have been criticized for inflating Type I error rates under the null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) paradigm. Despite these criticisms, this research practice is not uncommon, probably because it appeals to researcher's intuition collect more data push an indecisive result into a decisive region. In contribution, we investigate properties of procedure Bayesian that allows with unlimited multiple testing, even after each participant. procedure, which...

10.1037/met0000061 article EN Psychological Methods 2015-12-14

Three experiments examined whether salient color singleton distractors automatically interfere with the detection form targets in visual search (e.g., J. Theeuwes, 1992), or degree of interference is top-down modulable. In Experiments 1 and 2, observers started a pure block trials, which contained either never distractor always (0% 100% distractors)--varying opportunity to learn suppression. subsequent trial blocks, proportion was systematically varied (within-subjects factor Experiment 1,...

10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.1 article EN Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 2009-01-01

Targets in a visual search task are detected faster if they appear probable target region as compared to less region, an effect which has been termed "probability cueing." The present study investigated whether probability cueing cannot only speed up detection, but also minimize distraction by distractors distractor regions regions. To this end, three experiments with salient, task-irrelevant, ("additional singleton") were conducted. Experiment 1 demonstrated that observers can utilize...

10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195 article EN cc-by Frontiers in Psychology 2014-11-06

The notion of a saliency-based processing architecture [1] underlying human vision is central to number current theories visual selective attention [e.g., 2]. On this view, focal-attention guided by an overall-saliency map the scene, which integrates (sums) signals from pre-attentive sensory feature-contrast computations (e.g., for color, motion, etc.). By linking Posterior Contralateral Negativity (PCN) component reaction time (RT) performance, we tested one specific prediction such...

10.1371/journal.pone.0016276 article EN cc-by PLoS ONE 2011-01-21

How can choice, confidence, and response times be modeled simultaneously? Here, we propose the new dynamical weighted evidence visibility (dynWEV) model, an extension of drift-diffusion model decision-making, to account for choices, reaction times, confidence simultaneously. The decision process in a binary perceptual task is described as Wiener accumulating sensory about choice options bounded by two constant thresholds. To judgments, assume period postdecisional accumulation parallel...

10.1037/rev0000411 article EN Psychological Review 2023-03-13

Abstract Historically, visual search models were mainly evaluated based on their account of mean reaction times (RTs) and accuracy data. More recently, Wolfe, Palmer, Horowitz (2010) have demonstrated that the shape entire RT distributions imposes important constraints theories can falsify even successful such as guided search, raising a challenge to computational search. Competitive is novel model meets this challenge. The an adaptation featuring series item selection identification...

10.1167/13.8.24 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Journal of Vision 2013-07-25

Background Based on introspectionist, semantic, and psychophysiological experimental frameworks, it has long been assumed that all affective states derive from two independent basic dimensions, valence arousal. However, until now, no study investigated whether arousal are also dissociable at the level of affect-related changes in cognitive processing. Methodology/Principal Findings We examined how both (negative vs. positive) (low high) influence performance tasks requiring executive control...

10.1371/journal.pone.0029287 article EN cc-by PLoS ONE 2011-12-21

When searching for a "pop-out" target, interference from salient but irrelevant distractor can be reduced or even prevented under certain circumstances. Here, five experiments were conducted to further our understanding of three different aspects top-down reduction: first, whether not qualitatively search modes account reduction patterns; second, practice plays causal role in reduction; and third, how specific is, that by intradimensional distractors as effectively cross-dimensional...

10.1037/a0027629 article EN Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 2012-01-01

Visual search for feature singletons is slowed when a task-irrelevant, but more salient distracter singleton concurrently presented. While there consensus that this interference effect can be influenced by internal system settings, it remains controversial at what stage of processing influence starts to affect visual coding. Advocates the "stimulus-driven" view maintain initial sweep entirely driven physical stimulus attributes and top-down settings bias only after selection most item. By...

10.1093/cercor/bhr231 article EN Cerebral Cortex 2011-09-07

Visual context information can guide attention in demanding (i.e., inefficient) search tasks. When participants are repeatedly presented with identically arranged ('repeated') displays, reaction times faster relative to newly composed ('non-repeated') displays. The present article examines whether this 'contextual cueing' effect operates also simple efficient) tasks and if so, there it influences target, rather than response, selection. results were that singleton-feature targets detected...

10.1167/10.5.20 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Journal of Vision 2010-05-01

Searching for an object among distracting objects is a common daily task.These searches differ in efficiency.Some are so difficult that each must be inspected turn, whereas others easy the target directly catches observer's eye.In four experiments, difficulty of searching orientation-defined was parametrically manipulated between blocks trials via target-distractor orientation contrast.We observed smooth transition from inefficient to efficient search with increasing contrast.When contrast...

10.1037/xhp0000156 article EN Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 2016-01-04

Unplanned optional stopping rules have been criticized for inflating Type I error rates under the null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) paradigm. Despite these criticisms this research practice is not uncommon, probably as it appeals to researcher’s intuition collect more data in order push an indecisive result into a decisive region. In contribution we investigate properties of procedure Bayesian that allows with unlimited multiple testing, even after each participant. procedure,...

10.31219/osf.io/w3s3s preprint EN 2016-10-14

In several visual tasks, participants report that they feel confident about discrimination responses at a level of stimulation which would not seeing the stimulus. How general and reliable is this effect? We compared subjective reports confidence visibility in an orientation task with varying stimulus contrast. Participants applied more liberal criteria for than visibility. While were efficient predicting trial accuracy visibility, only but associated contrast incorrect trials. It argued...

10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00591 article EN cc-by Frontiers in Psychology 2016-04-26

Is confidence in perceptual decisions generated by the same brain processes as decision itself, or does require metacognitive following up on decision? In a masked orientation task with varying stimulus-onset-asynchrony, we used EEG and cognitive modelling to trace timing of neural correlates confidence. Confidence reported human observers increased stimulus-onset-asynchrony correct lesser degree incorrect trials, pattern incompatible established models Electrophysiological activity was...

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116963 article EN cc-by NeuroImage 2020-05-24

Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected first. However, existing salience and visual search models assume noise in map computation or selection process. Consequently, they first stochastically dependent on salience, implying that attention could even captured by second (instead salient) field. Yet, less distractors has not been reported salience-based claim distractor more order attention. We tested this prediction using an...

10.1371/journal.pone.0052595 article EN cc-by PLoS ONE 2013-01-28

Abstract The redundant-signals effect (RSE) refers to a speed-up of RT when the response is triggered by two, rather than just one, response-relevant target elements. Although there agreement that in visual modality RSEs observed with dimensionally redundant signals originating from same location are generated coactive processing architectures, has been debate as exact stage(s)—preattentive versus postselective—of at which coactivation arises. To determine origin(s) redundancy gains pop-out...

10.1162/jocn.2010.21422 article EN Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010-01-04

Pop-out search implies that the target is always first item selected, no matter how many distractors are presented. However, increasing evidence indicates not entirely independent of display density even for pop-out targets: slower with sparse (few distractors) than dense displays (many distractors). Despite its significance, cause this anomaly remains unclear. We investigated several mechanisms could slow down targets. Consistent assumption targets frequently fail to pop out in displays, we...

10.1037/xge0000284 article EN Journal of Experimental Psychology General 2017-01-01
Coming Soon ...