Haolin Liu
A5080328033- Renal cell carcinoma treatment
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Chinese history and philosophy
- Food composition and properties
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
- GABA and Rice Research
- E-commerce and Technology Innovations
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
Zhejiang University
2025
Sichuan University
2013-2024
Inner Mongolia Medical University
2024
Jinggangshan University
2006-2008
Abstract Purpose: Fumarate hydratase–deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-deficient RCC) is a rare and lethal subtype of kidney cancer. However, the optimal treatments molecular correlates benefits for FH-deficient RCC are currently lacking. Experimental Design: A total 91 patients with from 15 medical centers between 2009 2022 were enrolled in this study. Genomic bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) performed on 88 45 untreated RCCs, respectively. Single-cell RNA-seq was to identify biomarkers...
Introduction Global warming has led to increased environmental stresses on plants, notably drought. This affects plant distribution and species adaptability, with some medicinal plants showing enhanced drought tolerance components. In this pioneering study, we delve into the intricate tapestry of Arnebia guttata , a renowned for its resilience in arid environments. By fusing rich historical narrative cutting-edge analytical methodologies, research endeavors demystify plant’s response stress,...
<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>Fumarate hydratase–deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-deficient RCC) is a rare and lethal subtype of kidney cancer. However, the optimal treatments molecular correlates benefits for FH-deficient RCC are currently lacking.</p>Experimental Design:<p>A total 91 patients with from 15 medical centers between 2009 2022 were enrolled in this study. Genomic bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) performed on 88 45 untreated RCCs, respectively. Single-cell...
<p>Supplementary Figure 2. Treatment details and survival outcomes of patients with metastatic FH-deficient RCC. (A) Swimmer plot showing the treatment response duration each patient receiving first-line systemic treatments; (B) Progression-free for (C) Overall (OS) treatments.</p>
<p>Supplementary Figure 6. Validation of the FH-deficient RCC immune signature. (A) UMAP plot showing expression selected genes; (B) Correlations between six genes in signature and treatment response, significance differential (q value) was determined by two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni FDR correction; (C) several related hallmark pathways, correction. *, q<0.05; **, q<0.01; ***, q<0.001; ****, q<0.0001.</p>
<p>Supplementary Figure 3. Forest plot showing the prognostic value of clinicopathologic and molecular features in patients treated with first-line ICI+TKI combination therapy. HR<1 indicates better survival comparator group, while HR>1 control group. TMB, tumor mutation burden; MUT, mutation; WT, wild type; TPS, proportion score; CCP, cell cycle progression; Sig., signature.</p>
<p>Supplementary Figure 6. Validation of the FH-deficient RCC immune signature. (A) UMAP plot showing expression selected genes; (B) Correlations between six genes in signature and treatment response, significance differential (q value) was determined by two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni FDR correction; (C) several related hallmark pathways, correction. *, q<0.05; **, q<0.01; ***, q<0.001; ****, q<0.0001.</p>
<p>Supplementary Figure 5. Cell clusters and their distribution in a validation cohort by Dong et al.. (A) UMAP plot showing the sample of T cells; (B) all cells collected from four samples; (C) Dot marker gene expression for clusters; (D) Bar plots tissue (E) Tissue prevalence cell estimated Ro/e score.</p>
<p>Supplementary Figure 2. Treatment details and survival outcomes of patients with metastatic FH-deficient RCC. (A) Swimmer plot showing the treatment response duration each patient receiving first-line systemic treatments; (B) Progression-free for (C) Overall (OS) treatments.</p>
<p>Supplementary Figure 1. Survival outcomes of patients with synchronous and metachronous metastatic disease treatment flows. Overall survival (OS) for FH-deficient RCC in the overall systemic setting (A), ICI+TKI (B), TKI monotherapy (C); (D) Sankey diagram showing flows RCC.</p>
<p>Supplementary Figure 5. Cell clusters and their distribution in a validation cohort by Dong et al.. (A) UMAP plot showing the sample of T cells; (B) all cells collected from four samples; (C) Dot marker gene expression for clusters; (D) Bar plots tissue (E) Tissue prevalence cell estimated Ro/e score.</p>
<p>Supplementary Figure 1. Survival outcomes of patients with synchronous and metachronous metastatic disease treatment flows. Overall survival (OS) for FH-deficient RCC in the overall systemic setting (A), ICI+TKI (B), TKI monotherapy (C); (D) Sankey diagram showing flows RCC.</p>