Haske van Veenendaal

ORCID: 0000-0001-7423-5564
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Dutch Social and Cultural Studies
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Comparative and International Law Studies
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Empathy and Medical Education

Catharina Ziekenhuis
2025

Radboud University Nijmegen
2025

Erasmus University Rotterdam
2018-2022

European Public Health Association
2021-2022

Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement
2007-2016

Wikimedia Nederland
2015

Zorginstituut Nederland
2004

Transnational University Limburg
1996

Clinical practice guidelines are largely conceived as tools that will inform health professionals' decisions rather than foster patient involvement in decision making. The time now seems right to adapt clinical such a way both the professional's perspective care provider and patients' preferences characteristics being weighed equally decision-making process. We hypothesise can be adapted facilitate integration of individual This research protocol asks two questions: How should elicit support...

10.1186/1748-5908-5-10 article EN cc-by Implementation Science 2010-02-02

Dutch initiatives targeting shared decision-making (SDM) are still growing, supported by the government, Federation of Patients’ Organisations, professional bodies and healthcare insurers. The large majority patients prefers SDM model. working hard to realise improvement in application daily clinical practice, resulting glimpses success with objectified on observed behavior. Nevertheless, culture shift is ongoing. Large-scale uptake behavior a challenge. We haven’t yet fully reached...

10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.029 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2022-05-22
Thomas F. Stoop Leonard W. F. Seelen Freek R. van ‘t Land A. C. van der Hout Jacobien C.M. Scheepens and 87 more Mohammed Shnain Ali Anne M. Stiggelbout B M van der Kolk Bert A. Bonsing Daan J. Lips Derk Jan A. de Groot Eran van Veldhuisen Emile D. Kerver Eric R. Manusama Freek Daams Geert Kazemier Geert A. Cirkel Geertjan van Tienhoven Gijs A. Patijn H. N. Lelieveld-Rier Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh Irene E.G. van Hellemond Jan H. Wijsman Joris I. Erdmann J. Sven D. Mieog Judith de Vos‐Geelen Jan Willem B. de Groot Kishan R. D. Lutchman Leonie J. Mekenkamp Leonieke W. Kranenburg Lysanne P.M. Beuk Maarten W. Nijkamp Marcel den Dulk M. Polée Marjolein Y.V. Homs M. L. Wumkes Martijn W.J. Stommel Olivier R. Busch Roeland F. de Wilde Rutger T. Theijse Saskia Luelmo Sebastiaan Festen Thomas L. Bollen Ulf P. Neumann Vincent E. de Meijer Werner A. Draaisma Bas Groot Koerkamp I. Quintus Molenaar Christopher L. Wolfgang Marco Del Chiaro Matthew S. Katz Thilo Hackert Judith Rietjens Johanna W. Wilmink Hjalmar C. van Santvoort Casper H.J. van Eijck Marc G. Besselink A. Bruynzeel Anniek Vlijm A. van Asseldonk Babs M. Zonderhuis Amaria Javed A R Sterk Annuska Schoorlemmer Anita G.M. Stam C. Yung Nio E. van Alphen Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven Haske van Veenendaal Ingeborg Griffioen Ingmar F. Rompen J.M. Klaase Maartje Los M.F.M.A. Marting Mike S.L. Liem June A. Peters L.J. Peters Linda M. Garms Marieke S. Walma L. Brada M. Seijbel Nicole D Hildebrand Nynke Michiels Ryan Bax R. Michael van Dam S. Achten Stefan A.W. Bouwense Simone Augustinus S. Rötgerink Thomas W. van Ravens Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs Wouter W. te Riele

Abstract Background The introduction of (m)FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel has changed the perspective for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Consequently, in experienced centres 23% LAPC undergo a resection 5-year overall survival (OS) rates up to 25%. In Netherlands, nationwide rate remains low at 8%. PREOPANC-4 program aims implementation international multidisciplinary best-practice improve patient outcome. Methods Nationwide implementing LAPC. training...

10.1186/s12885-025-13554-w article EN cc-by BMC Cancer 2025-02-19

Clinical practice guidelines should be based on the best available evidence. However, this evidence is often incomplete, controversial, or lacking. Other considerations beyond are therefore needed to able formulate specific and applicable recommendations for clinical practice.The aim of study obtain consensus among experts about a set domains items covering most relevant 'other considerations' in evidence-based guideline development.An initial list 10 49 systematic considered judgement...

10.1093/intqhc/mzl040 article EN International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006-09-07

Shared decision making (SDM) for cancer treatment yields positive results. However, it appears that discussing essential topics SDM is not fully integrated into yet. Therefore, we aim to explore what extent discussion of therapy options, consequences, and personal priorities preferred perceived by (former) patients.An online questionnaire was distributed the Dutch Federation Cancer Patient Organisations among patients in 2018.Among 3785 patients, 3254 (86%) had discussed treatments with...

10.1111/ecc.13534 article EN European Journal of Cancer Care 2021-11-02

Abstract Background Women with newly diagnosed breast cancer face multiple treatment options. Involving them in a shared decision-making (SDM) process is essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether multilevel implementation programme enhanced the level SDM behaviour clinicians observed consultations. Methods This before–after conducted six Dutch hospitals. Patients who were facing decision on surgery or neoadjuvant systemic between April 2016 and September 2017 included,...

10.1093/bjsopen/zraa002 article EN cc-by-nc BJS Open 2020-12-23

Evaluation of a multilevel implementation program on shared decision making (SDM) for breast cancer clinicians.The was based the 'Measurement Instrument Determinants Innovations-model' (MIDI). Key factors effective were included. Eleven teams selected from two geographical areas participated; first six surgery and second five systemic therapy teams. A mixed method evaluation carried out at end each period: Descriptive statistics used surveys thematic content analysis semi-structured...

10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.005 article EN cc-by Patient Education and Counseling 2021-05-11

10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.022 article EN Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen - German Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007-05-01

Background: Enhancing the application of shared decision-making (SDM) is critical for integrating patient preferences in breast cancer treatment choices. We investigated effect an adapted multilevel SDM implementation program care. Methods: Breast patients qualifying (neo)adjuvant systemic were included a multicenter before−after study. Consultations audio recorded between June 2018 and July 2019 analyzed using five-item Observing Patient Involvement Decision-Making (OPTION-5) instrument to...

10.3390/curroncol30010019 article EN cc-by Current Oncology 2022-12-23

Because of disease progression and the increasing number treatment options, patients with metastatic breast cancer face multiple decisions over time. Our aim was to identify in order decide which decision aids will be developed. First, we analyzed clinical practice guidelines encountered by healthcare professionals. Furthermore, an online questionnaire for patients, a focus group interview interviews professionals were performed. In addition, performed systematic literature research internet...

10.35680/2372-0247.1129 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Patient Experience Journal 2016-04-28

Shared decision-making (SDM) is particularly important in oncology as many treatments involve serious side effects, and treatment decisions a trade-off between benefits risks. However, the implementation of SDM care challenging, clinicians state that it difficult to apply their actual workplace. Training known be an effective means improving but considered time consuming.This study aims address effectiveness individual training program using concept deliberate practice.This multicenter,...

10.2196/35543 article EN cc-by JMIR Research Protocols 2022-02-28

10.1007/s12414-015-0074-5 article NL Bijblijven 2015-09-29
Coming Soon ...