A5058794897- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Ethics in Business and Education
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
- Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Jury Decision Making Processes
- Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
- Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Thermal Regulation in Medicine
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Psychology of Social Influence
Nova Southeastern University
2024
Iowa State University
2024
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
2021-2024
Imperial College London
2021-2022
Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital
2021
Few large cohort studies have reported data on maternal, fetal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnancy. We report the outcome of infected pregnancies from a collaboration formed early during pandemic between investigators two registries, UK Global Pregnancy Neonatal COVID-19 (PAN-COVID) study American Academy Pediatrics (AAP) Section Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (SONPM) National Perinatal Registry.
To assess perinatal outcomes for pregnancies affected by suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.Prospective, web-based registry. Pregnant women were invited to participate if they had infection between 1st January 2020 and 31st March 2021 the impact of on maternal including miscarriage, stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, pre-term birth transmission infant.Between April 2021, study recruited 8239 participants who SARs-CoV-2 episodes in pregnancy 2021. Maternal death 14/8197 (0.2%)...
Purpose This study aims to investigate suspects underlying motivations resist cooperation during investigative interviews. The authors propose a tripartite framework (i.e. concerns for identity, relational and instrumental reasons) understanding resist, tested through three qualitative studies. Design/methodology/approach coded semi-structured debriefs about investigators’ experiences with communicative resistance throughout their careers ( n = 40; Study 1), particularly resistant 18; 2)...
Abstract Evaluating other people's moral character is a crucial social cognitive task. However, the processes by which people seek out, prioritize, and integrate multiple pieces of character‐relevant information have not been studied empirically. The first aim this research was to examine traits are considered most important when forming an impression person's overall character. second understand how differing levels trait expression affect judgments. Four preregistered studies one...
Prior research suggests that jurors may commit the fundamental attribution error when evaluating confession evidence (i.e., failing to recognize situational pressures inherent coercive interrogations) and exhibit belief perseverance presented with expert testimony or judicial instructions seeking remediate juror knowledge. Given mixed findings regarding use of safeguards might assist in rendering appropriate decisions, current examined effectiveness reason elaboration instructions. We...