Michael T. Stuart

ORCID: 0000-0002-4165-2641
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • History of Science and Medicine
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Science and Climate Studies
  • Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
  • Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • History of Science and Natural History
  • Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • African cultural and philosophical studies
  • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Philosophy, History, and Historiography

University of York
2024

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
2021-2023

University of Geneva
2018-2022

London School of Economics and Political Science
2017-2022

University of Tübingen
2021

University of Pittsburgh
2016

University of Toronto
2012-2013

Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques
2012

Imagination is important for many things in science: solving problems, interpreting data, designing studies, and much else. Philosophers of imagination typically account the productive role played by science focusing on how constrained, example, self-imposed rules to infer logically or model events accurately. But constraints offered these philosophers constrain either too not enough, they can never uses that are needed break today’s order make progress tomorrow. Thus, epistemology needs...

10.1086/710629 article EN Philosophy of Science 2020-07-11

While philosophers hold that it is patently absurd to blame robots or them morally responsible [1], a series of recent empirical studies suggest people do ascribe AI systems and in certain contexts [2]. This disconcerting: Blame might be shifted from the owners, users designers themselves, leading diminished accountability human agents [3]. In this paper, we explore one potential underlying reasons for robot blame, namely folk's willingness inculpating mental states "mens rea" robots....

10.1145/3479507 article EN Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2021-10-13

What role does the imagination play in scientifi c progress? After examining several studies cognitive science, I argue that one thing imagination does is help to increase understanding, which itself indispensable for progress. Then, sketch a transcendental justification of this process.

10.5840/croatjphil20171712 article EN Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2017-04-11

10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.04.002 article EN Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2016-05-06

Recent research shows -- somewhat astonishingly that people are willing to ascribe moral blame AI-driven systems when they cause harm [1]-[4]. In this paper, we explore the moral-psychological underpinnings of these findings. Our hypothesis was reason why AI is consider them capable entertaining inculpating mental states (what called mens rea in law). To hypothesis, created a scenario which an system runs risk poisoning by using novel type fertilizer. Manipulating computational (or...

10.1145/3434074.3447202 preprint EN 2021-03-08

10.1007/s10516-016-9306-2 article EN Axiomathes 2016-08-23

10.1007/s11191-019-00067-9 article EN Science & Education 2019-08-14

The history of thought experiments is now gaining a great deal attention, and this due to the renewed interest philosophers on subject. This paper inquires into philosophy experiments. We name period be examined in "forerun." Its main stakeholders are Georg C. Lichtenberg, Novalis, Immanuel Kant. will present discuss work each them order characterize period, then reveal parallels lessons that apply more recently proposed accounts

10.1162/posc_a_00127 article EN Perspectives on Science 2013-12-24

Abstract Scientists imagine for epistemic reasons, and these imaginings can be better or worse. But what does it mean an imagining to epistemically worse? There are at least three metaepistemological frameworks that offer different answers this question: epistemological consequentialism, deontic epistemology, virtue epistemology. This paper presents empirical evidence scientists adopt each of with respect imagination, but argues the way they do is best explained if fundamentally...

10.1017/psa.2022.31 article EN Philosophy of Science 2022-05-25

Abstract In this article, we analyse the evidential value of corpus experimental philosophy (x-phi). While philosophers claim that their studies provide insight into philosophical problems, some and psychologists have expressed concerns findings from these lack value. Barriers to include selection bias (i.e., selective publication significant results) p-hacking (practices increase odds obtaining a p-value below significance level). To find out whether in x-phi papers result or p-hacking,...

10.1093/analys/anz007 article EN Analysis 2019-01-21

10.1037/qup0000297 article EN cc-by Qualitative Psychology 2024-06-01

We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey world’s scientists on ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding opinions and scientific sub-communities, both at a time also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, each institution in network, sending invitation emails internally their home institution. link ‘10 second survey’, where participant is presented single statement consider, standard five-point Likert scale. In...

10.1371/journal.pone.0313541 article EN cc-by PLoS ONE 2024-12-06

Paul Thagard has recently argued that thought experiments are dangerous and misleading when we try to use them as evidence for claims. This paper refutes his skepticism. Building on Thagard's own work in cognitive science, I suggest much is positive say about how work. My last section presents some new directions research the intersection between science.

10.1162/posc_a_00130 article EN Perspectives on Science 2013-12-24

We might think that thought experiments are at their most powerful or interesting when they produce new knowledge. This would be a mistake; seek understanding just as and interesting, perhaps even more so. A growing number of epistemologists emphasizing the importance for epistemology, arguing it should supplant knowledge central notion. In this chapter, I bring literature on in epistemology to bear explicating different ways increase three important kinds understanding: explanatory,...

10.4324/9781315175027.ch30 article EN 2017-07-22

The history of the philosophy thought experiments (TEs) has touched on work Kuhn, Popper, Duhem, Mach, Lakatos, and other big names twentieth-century. But so far, almost nothing been written about Paul Feyerabend. His most influential was Against Method, eight chapters which concern Galileo, with a significant focus Galileo's TEs. later Feyerabend interested in what might be called epistemology drama, including stories myths. This article brings these aspects Feyerabend's together an attempt...

10.1086/712946 article EN HOPOS The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2020-12-16

Abstract Metaphors are found all throughout science: in published papers, working hypotheses, policy documents, lecture slides, grant proposals, and press releases. They serve different functions, but perhaps most striking is the way they enable understanding, of a theory, phenomenon, or idea. In this paper, we leverage recent advances on nature metaphor understanding to explore how accomplish feat. We attempt shift focus away from epistemic value content metaphors, metaphor’s consequences....

10.1007/s13194-022-00479-5 article EN cc-by European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2022-07-19

10.1007/s11229-022-03939-w article EN Synthese 2022-10-31

10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.03.005 article EN publisher-specific-oa Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2020-04-10
Coming Soon ...