A5046868285- Research Data Management Practices
- Academic Publishing and Open Access
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
- Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Library Science and Information Systems
- Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Conferences and Exhibitions Management
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Social Media in Health Education
- Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
- FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Advanced Data Storage Technologies
- Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2022-2024
New York University Press
2016-2022
Futures Group (United States)
2020
Rogers (United States)
2020
Digital Science (United States)
2014-2015
Harvard University Press
2011-2013
Holyoke Community College
2011
Harvard University
2011
Crossref
2004-2008
Lynn University
2004
Key points As the number of authors on scientific publications increases, ordered lists author names are proving inadequate for purposes attribution and credit. A multi‐stakeholder group has produced a contributor role taxonomy use in publications. Identifying specific contributions to published research will lead appropriate credit, fewer disputes, disincentives collaboration sharing data code.
Peer review is an important part of the scientific process, but traditional peer at journals coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack transparency. As preprints become more widely used accepted, they raise possibility rethinking peer-review process. Preprints are enabling new forms that have potential to be thorough, inclusive, collegial than journal review, thus fundamentally shift culture toward constructive collaboration. In this Consensus View, we make a call action...
Preventing monopolies in knowledge infrastructure is the next battleground for publishers and research institutions
Preprints enable new forms of peer review that have the potential to be more thorough, inclusive, and collegial. In December 2022, 80 researchers representatives funders, institutions, preprint servers, journals, indexers, services were invited gather online at Janelia Research Campus for a workshop on Recognizing Preprint Peer Review. Sponsored by HHMI, ASAPbio, EMBO, this meeting aimed catalyze community consensus support create model funder, institutional, journal policies recognize both...
Scholarly publishing plays a pivotal role in the dissemination of research. While great deal is known about companies active this sector, we need to know more employees firms that edit, produce, market, and distribute today's scholarly books journals. To achieve goal, researchers conducted an international survey late 2014 early 2015 approximately 6,121 33 nations. The received 828 usable questionnaires. Some substantive findings respondents include: 90.79% identified themselves as white;...
As efforts advance around the globe, US falls behind.
Study finds a pervasive void of infrastructure thinking.
Science policy promotes open access to research data for purposes of transparency and reuse in the public interest. We expect demands scholarly publishing accelerate, at least partly response opacity artificial intelligence algorithms. Open should be findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable (FAIR), also trustworthy verifiable. The current state is transition from 'nice have' 'need have.' Research are valuable, interpretable, verifiable only context their origin, with sufficient...
Academic review committees would benefit from more details about the contributions made by individual researchers to papers with multiple authors, and also information other types of scholarly communication.
As a relatively new university press director intent on future‐proofing the MIT Press during time of rapid change, crucial question for me is how to honor legacy excellence in content, design, and production as we move into future part an educational institution committed experimentation, invention, open information access. For us, answer that not only embrace it but actively participate creating defining future. This article provides high‐level overview current strategic priorities...
CrossRef is an independent membership association for building shared technologies. It has unusual mission: to improve access published scholarship through services that require collective agreement among competitors in scholarly and professional publishing. The network today covers millions of articles other content items from several hundred publishers. This article looks at how far come since it launched 2000 what happen going forward order the service arrive a truly comprehensive linking...
ABSTRACT CrossRef is an independent membership association for building collaborative publishing technologies. Its mission to provide services that enable the scholar reach source material easily; it focuses on methods are best achieved through collective agreement among publishers. The network now covers millions of journal articles and other content items from hundreds This article looks at CrossRef's significance online research experience, four years after launch initiative.
Social innovations are happening in many critical areas. Foundations make an enduring contribution towards increasing access to public welfare based on the philosophy that believes state-run organizations neither efficient nor responsive people's changing needs. In this sense, foundations help close gap by turning hitherto tolerated conditions into problems and claims action. The effectiveness of voluntary bodies as advocates change owes much their informal nature. Germany, actions Public...
As open access to research information grows and publisher business models adapt accordingly, knowledge infrastructure has become the new frontier for advocates of science. This paper argues that time come universities other institutions assume a larger role in mitigating risks arise from ongoing consolidation infrastructure, including privatization community platforms, commercial control analytics solutions, market-driven trends scientific scholarly publishing.
ABSTRACT CrossRef's mission is to improve access published scholarship through services that require consensus and collective initiative among publishers. The CrossRef citation-linking network today covers millions of articles other content items from several hundred scholarly professional This article looks briefly at attempt develop a cross-publisher full-text search service how this relates the launch Google Scholar currently in beta format.
CrossRef is an independent membership association for building shared technologies. It has unusual mission: to improve access published scholarship through services that require collective agreement among competitors in scholarly and professional publishing. The network today covers millions of articles other content items from several hundred publishers. This article looks at how far come since it launched 2000 what happen going forward order the service arrive a truly comprehensive linking...