A5070685450- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Doping in Sports
- Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Social Media in Health Education
- Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Research Data Management Practices
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Pregnancy-related medical research
- Diatoms and Algae Research
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
- Counseling Practices and Supervision
- demographic modeling and climate adaptation
- Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Activity and Health
- Rural development and sustainability
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Social Work Education and Practice
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
- History and advancements in chemistry
- Academic integrity and plagiarism
Royal Society
2000-2024
Canterbury Christ Church University
2017-2024
Royal Society of South Australia
2021
Natural History Museum
2013
Clevedon Hospital
2000
Peer review is an important part of the scientific process, but traditional peer at journals coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack transparency. As preprints become more widely used accepted, they raise possibility rethinking peer-review process. Preprints are enabling new forms that have potential to be thorough, inclusive, collegial than journal review, thus fundamentally shift culture toward constructive collaboration. In this Consensus View, we make a call action...
Preprints enable new forms of peer review that have the potential to be more thorough, inclusive, and collegial. In December 2022, 80 researchers representatives funders, institutions, preprint servers, journals, indexers, services were invited gather online at Janelia Research Campus for a workshop on Recognizing Preprint Peer Review. Sponsored by HHMI, ASAPbio, EMBO, this meeting aimed catalyze community consensus support create model funder, institutional, journal policies recognize both...
The global crisis sparked collaboration between publishers and service providers to successfully address an immediate problem demonstrated the possibility for future partnerships.Encouraging experts join a reviewer pool quickly review preprint journal submissions, we were able publish COVID-19 research more quickly.The initiative confirmed little author uptake of inter-publisher transfer option.The showed wide consensus on open science practices which will ensure faster reliable findings.
Research on doping prevention has proliferated in recent years as evidenced by the development of several anti-doping interventions. However, researchers have rarely examined whether an intervention delivered and evaluated one population is similarly effective a different population. The purpose our research was to determine psychological developed Kavussanu et al. (2022) originally British Greek athletes, equally standard educational preventing (i.e., influencing primary secondary outcomes)...
Introduction The benefits of physical activity during pregnancy and after childbirth are well established, yet many health care professionals do not feel equipped to provide guidance these populations. As such, the objectives this study were explore immediate longer term effects training on professionals’ ability pregnant women new mothers (mums). Methods Midwives visitors from 5 locations in United Kingdom provided with Chief Medical Officers' guidelines for (n = 393). attended become This...
ABSTRACT An experiment in online peer review was carried out by the Royal Society, on journal Proceedings : Biological Sciences. Authors were asked to provide Acrobat PDF files and uploaded them using a web interface. Referees provided with URL that gave access paper entered their report into an form. Almost 50% of authors contacted used method referees greeted enthusiasm. Editorial staff found system easier than expected keen continue its use.
Publishing peer review materials alongside research articles promises to make the process more transparent as well making it easier recognise these contributions and give credit reviewers. Traditionally, reports, editors letters author responses are only shared between small number of people in those roles prior publication, but there is a growing interest some or all available. A journals have been publishing for time, others begun this practice recently, significantly now considering how...
Restricted accessMoreSectionsView Full TextView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Hurst Phil 2010Trailblazing—350 years of Royal Society publishingNotes Rec. R. Soc.6485–89http://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2009.0077SectionRestricted accessReportsTrailblazing—350 publishing [email protected] Google Scholar Find author on PubMed Search for more papers by Published:13 January...
While recent surveys show that most stakeholders recognise the importance of peer review to publication process, there is a lack systematic research on topic. In period hyper-competition for resources, with perverse incentives lead academic capitalism and “publish or perish” mentality, robust cumulative approaches, models practices can slow down efforts towards fostering integrity credibility scholarly communication. A major challenge in studying systematically available data. data sharing...
The winner of the first-ever Notes and Records Essay Award was publicly announced at a reception Royal Society on 21st May. The is Daniel Mitchell, for his essay entitled ‘Reflecting nature: chemistry comprehensibility in Gabriel Lippmann's “physical” method photographing
While peer review plays a central role in the evaluation and publication of research findings, there are number known challenges related to inefficiencies lack diversity process at system level. Preprint activities have received increasing attention recent years may provide avenues for addressing some current journal review. At workshop during Researcher Reader conference February 2021, we explored how preprint could be made more complementary with leveraged increase We summarize discussions...
Confusion over the role of court welfare officer as reporter still persists. Hurst argues that recent changes in work have not represented a move to conciliation, but major re-orientation method. Through typology family problems and proposed framework for focussing reports, he tries show how officers can integrate this new approach with traditional considerations.