A5029006782- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health disparities and outcomes
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
- Global Health Workforce Issues
- Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Bone health and osteoporosis research
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Social Media in Health Education
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Public Health Policies and Education
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
University of Ottawa
2016-2025
Bruyère
2016-2025
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
2012-2025
Ottawa Hospital
2000-2025
Campbell Scientific (Canada)
2019-2024
University of Calgary
2024
RTI International
2024
McMaster University
2023
Public Health Ontario
2020-2022
Université de Sherbrooke
2021
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
The number of published systematic reviews studies healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical policy decisions. Systematic subject to a range biases increasingly include non-randomised interventions. It is important that users can distinguish high quality reviews. Many instruments have been designed evaluate different aspects reviews, but there few comprehensive critical appraisal instruments. AMSTAR was developed randomised trials. In this...
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users assess the trustworthiness applicability review findings. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed facilitate transparent complete reporting has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) reflect recent advances methodology terminology. Here, we present explanation elaboration paper 2020, where explain why each item is recommended, bullet points that...
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did they found. Over last decade, there have been many advances methodology terminology, which necessitated an update guideline.Objectives: To develop PRISMA 2020 statement reporting reviews.Methods: We reviewed 60 documents with guidance generate suggested modifications 2009...
Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews meta-analyses.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these rarely reported. This of transparency in the can cast doubt on validity review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline has been developed guide clear reporting interventions which meta-analysis effect estimates used. article describes development SWiM for quantitative intervention effects and presents nine items with accompanying explanations examples.
La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas documentar manera transparente el porqué la revisión, qué hicieron y encontraron. Durante última década, ha habido muchos avances metodología terminología las sistemáticas, lo que requerido una actualización esta guía. prisma 2020 sustituye 2009 e incluye nueva guía presentación publicaciones refleja métodos identificar,...
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users assess the trustworthiness applicability review findings. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed facilitate transparent complete reporting has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) reflect recent advances methodology terminology. Here, we present explanation elaboration paper 2020, where explain why each item is recommended, bullet points that...
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
Vivian Welch and colleagues present consensus-based guidelines for reporting equity-focused systematic reviews, the PRISMA-Equity extension.
(see Appendix 2, available at [www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.090313/-/DC1][1] for summary of recommendations and clinical considerations) There are more than 200 million international migrants worldwide,[1][2] this movement people has implications individual