A5089979303- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Research Data Management Practices
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
- Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Peripheral Nerve Disorders
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
- Academic Publishing and Open Access
Monash University
2016-2025
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
2006-2025
Auckland City Hospital
2025
UCB Pharma (United Kingdom)
2023-2024
Takeda (United States)
2020-2023
University of Glasgow
2023
Queensland Health
2019-2023
Colorado School of Mines
2022
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute
2012-2022
Wellington Hospital
2021
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users assess the trustworthiness applicability review findings. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed facilitate transparent complete reporting has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) reflect recent advances methodology terminology. Here, we present explanation elaboration paper 2020, where explain why each item is recommended, bullet points that...
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did they found. Over last decade, there have been many advances methodology terminology, which necessitated an update guideline.Objectives: To develop PRISMA 2020 statement reporting reviews.Methods: We reviewed 60 documents with guidance generate suggested modifications 2009...
Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews meta-analyses.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
Literature searches underlie the foundations of systematic reviews and related review types. Yet, literature searching component types is often poorly reported. Guidance for search reporting has been diverse, and, in many cases, does not offer enough detail to authors who need more specific information about methods sources a clear, reproducible way. This document presents PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Meta-Analyses extension) checklist, explanation elaboration.
Reporting standards, such as PRISMA aim to ensure that the methods and results of systematic reviews are described in sufficient detail allow full transparency. Flow diagrams evidence syntheses reader rapidly understand core procedures used a review examine attrition irrelevant records throughout process. Recent research suggests use flow is poor low quality called for standardised templates facilitate better reporting diagrams. The increasing options interactivity provided by Internet gives...
La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas documentar manera transparente el porqué la revisión, qué hicieron y encontraron. Durante última década, ha habido muchos avances metodología terminología las sistemáticas, lo que requerido una actualización esta guía. prisma 2020 sustituye 2009 e incluye nueva guía presentación publicaciones refleja métodos identificar,...
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users assess the trustworthiness applicability review findings. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed facilitate transparent complete reporting has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) reflect recent advances methodology terminology. Here, we present explanation elaboration paper 2020, where explain why each item is recommended, bullet points that...
Address-space randomization is a technique used to fortify systems against buffer overflow attacks. The idea introduce artificial diversity by randomizing the memory location of certain system components. This mechanism available for both Linux (via PaX ASLR) and OpenBSD. We study effectiveness address-space find that its utility on 32-bit architectures limited number bits address randomization. In particular, we demonstrate <i>derandomization attack</i> will convert any standard...
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been...
Background Systematic reviews (SRs) can help decision makers interpret the deluge of published biomedical literature. However, a SR may be limited use if methods used to conduct are flawed, and reporting is incomplete. To our knowledge, since 2004 there has been no cross-sectional study prevalence, focus, completeness SRs across different specialties. Therefore, aim was investigate epidemiological characteristics more recent cross-section SRs. Methods Findings We searched MEDLINE identify...
Since the early 1990s, ecologists and evolutionary biologists have aggregated primary research using meta-analytic methods to understand ecological phenomena. Meta-analyses can resolve long-standing disputes, dispel spurious claims, generate new questions. At their worst, however, meta-analysis publications are wolves in sheep's clothing: subjective with biased conclusions, hidden under coats of objective authority. Conclusions be rendered unreliable by inappropriate statistical methods,...
Objectives: To describe the processes used to update PRISMA 2009 statement for reporting systematic reviews, present results of a survey conducted inform update, summarise decisions made at meeting, and justify changes guideline.Methods: We reviewed 60 documents with guidance reviews generate suggested modifications statement. invited 220 review methodologists journal editors complete about modifications. The these projects were discussed 21-member in-person meeting. Following we drafted...