- Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Global Maternal and Child Health
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Global Health Workforce Issues
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Global Health and Surgery
- Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- HIV-related health complications and treatments
- Delphi Technique in Research
- HIV Research and Treatment
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Health Services Management and Policy
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
2016-2025
University of Oxford
2016-2025
University of Warwick
2021
Northumbria University
2021
University of Exeter
2021
Lothian Sexual Health
2017
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
2017
Statistical Research (United States)
2016
Science Club
2016
John Radcliffe Hospital
2009-2011
Literature searches underlie the foundations of systematic reviews and related review types. Yet, literature searching component types is often poorly reported. Guidance for search reporting has been diverse, and, in many cases, does not offer enough detail to authors who need more specific information about methods sources a clear, reproducible way. This document presents PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Meta-Analyses extension) checklist, explanation elaboration.
Background: Literature searches underlie the foundations of systematic reviews and related review types. Yet, literature searching component types is often poorly reported. Guidance for search reporting has been diverse and, in many cases, does not offer enough detail to authors who need more specific information about methods sources a clear, reproducible way. This document presents PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Meta-Analyses extension) checklist, explanation...
One of the fundamental principles health research integrity is that methods and results should be completely transparently reported. Clear, detailed reporting allows reader to understand how a study was designed conducted, judge reliability its findings reproducibility methods, use tested interventions in their clinical practice.1-3 The way which are reported, therefore, can have direct impact on patients' lives.4 As late Professor Douglas Altman said, 'Readers not infer what probably done,...
Highlights•Many reporting guideline developers do not follow current available guidance.•Reporting should take an evidence-based approach.•Our findings can support strategies to promote adherence guidelines.•A strict definition of could help users fulfil their needs.AbstractBackground and ObjectivesWe investigated the developing methods guidelines in EQUATOR (Enhancing QUAlity Transparency Of health Research) Network's database.MethodsIn October 2018, we screened all records excluded those...
OBJECTIVES: Despite wide usage of the PRISMA Statement reporting guideline by systematic review authors, compliance with its items regarding literature search is suboptimal. We sought to develop an international standard for aligned improve quality and reproducibility reported searches.METHODOLOGY: formed executive committee lead PRISMA-S extension development. The study protocol was published prior inception. To identify potential inclusion, we performed a search. Identified were reviewed...