Juliette Young

ORCID: 0000-0002-8522-0883
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • French Urban and Social Studies
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies

Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
2020-2025

Agroécologie
2019-2025

Institut Agro Dijon
2019-2025

Université de Bourgogne
2020-2025

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
2024-2025

L'Institut Agro
2025

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
2012-2021

Natural Environment Research Council
2015

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
2013

Bush Heritage Australia
2010

Abstract Conflicts between people over wildlife are widespread and damaging to both the involved. Such issues often termed human–wildlife conflicts. We argue that this term is misleading may exacerbate problems hinder resolution. A review of 100 recent articles on conflicts reveals 97 were conservation other human activities, particularly those associated with livelihoods. suggest we should distinguish impacts human–human be explicit about different interests involved in conflict. Those...

10.1017/s0030605314000799 article EN Oryx 2014-11-11

Abstract Interviews are a widely used methodology in conservation research. They flexible, allowing in‐depth analysis from relatively small sample size and place the focus of research on views participants. While interviews popular method, several critiques have been raised response to their use, including lack transparency sampling strategy, choice questions mode analysis. In this paper, we analyse use aimed at making decisions for conservation. Through structured review 227 papers, explore...

10.1111/2041-210x.12828 article EN cc-by Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2018-01-01

A better, more effective dialogue is needed between biodiversity science and policy to underpin the sustainable use conservation of biodiversity. Many initiatives exist improve communication, but these largely conform a 'linear' or technocratic model communication in which scientific "facts" are transmitted directly advisers "solve problems". While this can help start dialogue, it is, on its own, insufficient, as decision taking complex, iterative often selective information used. Here, we...

10.1007/s10531-013-0607-0 article EN cc-by Biodiversity and Conservation 2014-01-07

The concept of ecosystem services has gained a strong political profile during the last 15 years. However, there is no specific EU policy devoted to governing services. This article shows that already embedded in recent (environmentally-related) policies, such as Biodiversity Strategy 2020 and Invasive Alien Species Regulation. Our review 12 policies that, overall, coherence between existing moderate. Policies showing very high are confined arenas address natural ecosystems, forestry, or...

10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014 article EN cc-by Ecosystem Services 2017-03-11

Journal Article Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science–policy interfaces Get access Simo Sarkki, Sarkki * 1Thule Institute, PO Box 7300, 90014 University Oulu, Finland. *Corresponding author. Email: simo.sarkki@oulu.fi. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Jari Niemelä, Niemelä 2Faculty Biological Environmental sciences, Department Sciences, 65, 00014 Helsinki, Finland; jari.niemela@helsinki.fi. Rob...

10.1093/scipol/sct046 article EN Science and Public Policy 2013-08-28

The promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on services actually used inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems European Latin American countries. None of the reported instrumental use a sense would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, most cases, there was some evidence conceptual learning result close interaction...

10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019 article EN cc-by Ecosystem Services 2017-09-11

By linking iterative learning and knowledge generation with power-sharing, adaptive co-management (ACM) provides a potential solution to resolving complex social-ecological problems. In this paper we evaluate ACM as mechanism for conservation conflict using case study in Scotland, where seal salmon fishery stakeholders have opposing entrenched objectives. emerged 2002, successfully long-standing conflict. Applying evaluation approaches from the literature, 2011 interviewed characterise...

10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.019 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Journal of Environmental Management 2015-07-04

Abstract Background There is a strong policy impetus for the One Health cross-sectoral approach to address complex challenge of zoonotic diseases, particularly in low/lower middle income countries (LMICs). Yet implementation this LMIC contexts such as India has proven challenging, due partly relatively limited practical guidance and understanding on how foster sustain cross-sector collaborations. This study addresses gap by exploring facilitators barriers successful convergence between...

10.1186/s12889-021-11545-7 article EN cc-by BMC Public Health 2021-08-06

Abstract There are strong links between heritage and the environment yet, is not fully included in existing ecosystem‐based frameworks. Different understandings of values exist, yet related to key value categories environmental research. To address this gap facilitate a common values‐based approach, we develop novel framework that values. First, expand understanding by linking categories. We then use Life Framework Values show how features different ways which people relate world. The...

10.1002/pan3.10386 article EN cc-by People and Nature 2022-07-30

To address the ongoing deterioration of marine ecosystems and its consequences on livelihood, European Union (EU) now aims to achieve 30% coverage Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), with 10% under strict protection per region.Here, we provide first assessment levels EU MPAs, describing level legal restrictions activities using MPA Guide framework.While MPAs covered 11.4% national waters in 2022, 0.2% were fully or highly protected.As much as 86% showed low protection, would not be considered...

10.1016/j.oneear.2024.07.010 article EN cc-by-nc-nd One Earth 2024-08-13

Abstract Lack of public support for, and protest against, biodiversity management measures have often been explained by the apparently inadequate knowledge in general public. In stark contrast to this assumption ignorance, our results from focus group discussions The Netherlands, Germany Scotland show that members use very rich complex social representations argue for particular approaches management. Within these representations, we identified important components, such as (i) functions...

10.3843/biodiv.4.2:1 article EN The International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 2008-06-01
Coming Soon ...