Luke Zhu

ORCID: 0009-0002-9418-2433
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Psychology of Social Influence
  • International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Academic Freedom and Politics
  • Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments

York University
2019-2021

University of Manitoba
2014-2019

University of British Columbia
2012-2015

This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they published. Our goal is establish non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replications all ten moral judgment effects last author and his...

10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2016-03-24

Negative gut reactions to harmless-but-offensive transgressions can be driven by inferences about the moral character of agent more so than condemnation act itself. Dissociations between judgments acts and persons emerged, such that participants viewed a transgression less immoral harmful act, yet indicative poor character. Participants were likely become “morally dumbfounded” when asked justify their relative act. However, they significantly morally dumbfounded who engaged in transgression,...

10.1177/1948550613497238 article EN Social Psychological and Personality Science 2013-07-25

Summary This article presents three studies examining how cross‐cultural variation in assumptions about the appropriateness of referencing nonwork roles while work settings creates consequential impressions that affect professional outcomes. Study 1 reveals a perceived norm limiting at and provides evidence it is U.S. by showing awareness varies as function tenure living United States. Studies 2 3 examine implications for evaluations job candidates. finds but not Indian participants...

10.1002/job.1874 article EN Journal of Organizational Behavior 2013-06-17

Significance Past laboratory research has shown that talking about helping others can make a positive impression upon listener. We tested whether this basic social-cognitive phenomenon help explain how governments gain the confidence of public they serve. A computerized text analysis debates US Congress over past 20 y found density prosocial language strongly predicted approval ratings 6 mo later. These results suggest both individuals and social by merely cooperating others.

10.1073/pnas.1500355112 article EN Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2015-05-11

Abstract Inferences about moral character may often drive outrage over symbolic acts of racial bigotry. Study 1 demonstrates a theoretically predicted dissociation between evaluations an act and the person who carries out act. Although Americans regarded private use slur as less blameworthy than physical assault, was perceived clearer indicator poor character. 2 highlights dynamic interplay judgments persons, demonstrating that first making can bias subsequent judgments. Privately defacing...

10.1002/ejsp.1987 article EN European Journal of Social Psychology 2013-10-03

Abstract. The present studies examine how culturally held stereotypes about gender (that women eat more healthfully than men) implicitly influence food preferences. In Study 1, priming masculinity led both male and female participants to prefer unhealthy foods, while femininity healthy foods. 2 extended these effects gendered packaging. When the packaging healthiness of were schema congruent (i.e., feminine for a food, masculine an food) rated product as attractive, said that they would be...

10.1027/1864-9335/a000226 article EN Social Psychology 2015-06-19

We propose a model that explores the consequences of justice failure. conceptualize failure as threat to meaning and suggest belief in just world climate two moderators for proposed relationship. individuals react by engaging fluid compensation third parties are more likely than victims engage this process. further identity influences individuals’ reaction such high moral affirm their domain other domains. As result compensation, we finally who (a) act morally less immorally (b) punitive...

10.1177/2041386611434655 article EN Organizational Psychology Review 2012-04-11

We investigate forgiveness as a human service employee coping response to client-instigated victimizations and further explore the role of workgroup conflict in (a) facilitating this response, (b) influencing relationship between victimization workplace outcomes. Using theoretical lens Conservation Resources (Hobfoll, 1989), we propose that employees forgive clients-especially context low conflict. From moderate levels victimization, suggest are positively related; however, positive does not...

10.1037/apl0000286 article EN Journal of Applied Psychology 2018-01-22

Five studies are conducted to examine how ideology and perceptions regarding gender, race, caste, affiliation status affect individuals judge researchers' credibility. Support is found for predictions that researcher credibility according their egalitarian or elitist ideologies cues including university affiliation. Egalitarians evaluate low-status researchers as more credible than high-status researchers. Elitists show the opposite pattern. Credibility judgments whether will interpret...

10.1037/apl0000095 article EN Journal of Applied Psychology 2016-03-07

Despite organizations' professed commitment to fairness, thousands of employees file race-based discrimination claims every year. The current article examines how people deviate from impartiality when evaluating candidates in hiring decisions. Researchers have argued the ideological endorsement elitism (i.e., scoring high social dominance orientation) can lead against racial minorities. We examined whether an opposing commitment-egalitarianism-can also produce partiality, but favor minority...

10.1037/apl0000804 article EN Journal of Applied Psychology 2020-07-02

The present research identifies a subtle form of gender discrimination in the contracts provided to workers. Specifically, workers who pursue jobs atypical for their tend be hired by hour rather than offered fixed contracts, risk-averse practice that reflects lack confidence about future performance on part employers. In Study 1, controlled experiment, male evaluators expressed uncertainty female employee counter-stereotypical job and preferred pay her “as she goes.” 2 examined 99,567...

10.5465/ambpp.2014.16273abstract article EN Academy of Management Proceedings 2014-01-01

Abstract We present the data from a crowdsourced project seeking to replicate findings in independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. In this Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) initiative, 25 research groups attempted 10 moral judgment effects single laboratory’s pipeline of unpublished findings. The were investigated using online/lab surveys containing psychological manipulations (vignettes) followed by questionnaires. Results revealed mix reliable,...

10.1038/sdata.2016.82 article EN cc-by Scientific Data 2016-10-10

Moral typecasting is the tendency to categorize intentional perpetrators and suffering victims within moral interactions. We predicted a bias in typecasting, such that women are more easily typecast as men perpetrators. In Study 1, participants readily assumed harmed target was female than male, but especially when targets were described ‘victim’ ‘perpetrator’. 2 animated shapes perpetuating harm male victimized female. 3, expected experience pain from an ambiguous joke desired harsher...

10.5465/ambpp.2019.15459abstract article EN Academy of Management Proceedings 2019-08-01

10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.12.001 article EN Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2020-12-28
Coming Soon ...