Carlos Romero

ORCID: 0000-0001-7279-977X
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Psychology of Social Influence
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Business, Innovation, and Economy
  • Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
  • Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
  • Magnetism in coordination complexes
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Educational and Organizational Development
  • Latin American socio-political dynamics
  • Theology and Philosophy of Evil
  • Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Archaeological and Historical Studies
  • Free Will and Agency

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
2023

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
1999-2020

Universidad Autónoma Monterrey
2017

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
2011

Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat judgments in same way as typical expressions subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, property being right or wrong regardless disagreement. Moreover, this apparent validity has been taken to constitute one main explananda for philosophical accounts judgment. But is really case most people spontaneously having...

10.31234/osf.io/m52bg preprint EN 2024-01-04

Philosophers have long debated whether, if determinism is true, we should hold people morally responsible for their actions since in a deterministic universe, are arguably not the ultimate source of nor could they done otherwise initial conditions and laws nature held fixed. To reveal how non-philosophers ordinarily reason about free will, conducted cross-cultural cross-linguistic survey (N = 5,268) spanning twenty countries sixteen languages. Overall, participants tended to ascribe moral...

10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02428 article EN cc-by Frontiers in Psychology 2019-11-05

Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat judgments in same way as typical expressions subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, property being right or wrong regardless disagreement. Moreover, this apparent validity has been taken to constitute one main explananda for philosophical accounts judgment. But is really case most people spontaneously having...

10.1111/mila.12210 article EN Mind & Language 2018-08-01

Abstract Inclusion complexes of cyclobis(paraquat‐ p ‐phenylene) and various aromatic molecules in their neutral oxidized form were studied at the LMP2/6‐311+G**//BHandHLYP/6‐31G* level theory, which represents highest theoretical study to date for these complexes. The results show that it is dispersion interaction contributes most binding energy. One electron oxidation a guest molecule leads complete dissociation inclusion complex generating strong repulsion potential between host...

10.1002/qua.20360 article EN International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 2004-11-17

There has been much debate recently on the question whether essence can explain modality. Here, I examine two routes to an essentialist account of The first is Hale's argument for necessity essence, which will argue – notwithstanding recent attempted defences it invalid by its very structure. second proposal that essential truth necessary. After offering three possible versions view, each fails provide a metaphysical explanation in terms essence.

10.1080/0020174x.2023.2186948 article EN Inquiry 2023-04-13

10.1007/s11098-023-01981-z article EN Philosophical Studies 2023-05-18

Diariamente vemos noticias sobre politicos irresponsables que  rechazan  el consejo que los expertos basan en modelos cientificos, o nos encontramos con notas periodisticas distorsionan hechos las teorias. En Mexico, diariamente somos testigos —tanto se ha vuelto un chiste recurrente— de la evidente incapacidad comunidad periodistica para cubrir informes tecnicos, asi como dificultad tienen muchos columnistas comprender incluso mas basicos conceptos estadistica. Ademas, muchas veces...

10.5281/zenodo.3842191 article ES 2020-04-20

The Metaphysical Foundations of Physics

10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2021.1291 article EN Deleted Journal 2021-10-20
Coming Soon ...