Renatas Berniûnas

ORCID: 0000-0002-4720-8146
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Psychology of Social Influence
  • Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Theology and Philosophy of Evil
  • Categorization, perception, and language

Vilnius University
2015-2024

Aarhus University
2024

Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology
2019

Queen's University
2014

Suzanne Hoogeveen Alexandra Sarafoglou Balázs Aczél Yonathan Aditya Alexandra J. Alayan and 95 more Peter Allen Sacha Altay Shilaan Alzahawi Yulmaida Amir Francis-Vincent Anthony Obed Kwame Appiah Quentin D. Atkinson Adam Baimel Merve Balkaya‐Ince Michela Balsamo Sachin Banker František Bartoš Mario Becerra Bertrand Beffara Julia Beitner Theiss Bendixen Jana Berkessel Renatas Berniûnas Matthew I. Billet Joseph Billingsley Tiago Bortolini Heiko Breitsohl Amélie Bret Faith L. Brown Jennifer E. Brown Claudia Chloe Brumbaugh Jacek Buczny Joseph Bulbulia Saúl Caballero Leonardo Carlucci Cheryl L. Carmichael Marco Cattaneo Sarah Jane Charles Scott Claessens Maxinne C. Panagopoulos Ângelo Brandelli Costa Damien L. Crone Stefan Czoschke Christian S. Czymara E. Damiano D’Urso Örjan Dahlström Anna Dalla Rosa Henrik Danielsson Jill de Ron Ymkje Anna de Vries Kristy K. Dean Bryan J. Dik David J. Disabato Jaclyn K. Doherty Tim Draws Lucas G. Drouhot Marin Dujmović Yarrow Dunham Tobias Ebert Peter A. Edelsbrunner Anita Eerland Christian T. Elbæk Shole Farahmand Hooman Farahmand Miguel Farias Abrey A. Feliccia Kyle Fischer Ronald Fischer Donna Fisher‐Thompson Zoë Francis Susanne Frick Lisa K. Frisch Diogo Geraldes Emily Gerdin Linda Geven Omid Ghasemi Erwin Gielens Vukašin Gligorić Kristin Hagel Nándor Hajdú Hannah R. Hamilton Imaduddin Hamzah Paul H. P. Hanel Christopher E. Hawk Karel Karsten Himawan Benjamin C. Holding Lina Homman Moritz Ingendahl Hilla Inkilä Mary L. Inman Chris-Gabriel Islam Ozan İşler David Izydorczyk Bastian Jaeger Kathryn A. Johnson Jonathan Jong Johannes Alfons Karl Erikson Kaszubowski Benjamin A. Katz Lucas A. Keefer

The relation between religiosity and well-being is one of the most researched topics in psychology religion, yet directionality robustness effect remains debated. Here, we adopted a many-analysts approach to assess this based on new cross-cultural dataset (N=10,535 participants from 24 countries). We recruited 120 analysis teams investigate (1) whether religious people self-report higher well-being, (2) self-reported depends perceived cultural norms religion (i.e., it considered normal...

10.1080/2153599x.2022.2070255 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Religion Brain & Behavior 2022-07-06

Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat judgments in same way as typical expressions subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, property being right or wrong regardless disagreement. Moreover, this apparent validity has been taken to constitute one main explananda for philosophical accounts judgment. But is really case most people spontaneously having...

10.31234/osf.io/m52bg preprint EN 2024-01-04

For scientific theories grounded in empirical data, replicability is a core principle, for at least two reasons. First, unless we accept to have rest on the authority of small number researchers, studies should be replicable, sense that its methods and procedure detailed enough someone else conduct same study. Second, results provide solid foundation theorizing, they also most attempts replicating original study produced them would yield similar results. The XPhi Replicability Project...

10.31234/osf.io/sxdah preprint EN 2018-04-09

Philosophers have long debated whether, if determinism is true, we should hold people morally responsible for their actions since in a deterministic universe, are arguably not the ultimate source of nor could they done otherwise initial conditions and laws nature held fixed. To reveal how non-philosophers ordinarily reason about free will, conducted cross-cultural cross-linguistic survey (N = 5,268) spanning twenty countries sixteen languages. Overall, participants tended to ascribe moral...

10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02428 article EN cc-by Frontiers in Psychology 2019-11-05

In this paper we report a study conducted in Mongolia on the scope of morality, that is, extent to which people moralize different social domains. Following Turiel's moral‐conventional task, characterized moral transgressions (in contrast conventional transgressions) terms two dimensions: authority independence and generality scope. Different domains are then defined by grouping such their content (following Haidt's classification morally relevant domains). There four main results study....

10.1111/ajsp.12133 article EN Asian Journal Of Social Psychology 2016-04-19

10.1007/s41809-018-0013-y article EN Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2018-08-11

Nichols and Bruno (2010) claim that the folk judge psychological continuity is necessary for personal identity. In this article, we evaluate claim. First, argue it likely in thinking about hypothetical cases of transformations, do not use a unitary concept identity, but instead rely on different concepts 'person', 'identity', 'individual'. Identity can be ascribed even when post-transformation individuals are no longer categorized as persons. Second, provide new empirical evidence suggesting...

10.1080/09515089.2014.986325 article EN Philosophical Psychology 2016-01-02

Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat judgments in same way as typical expressions subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, property being right or wrong regardless disagreement. Moreover, this apparent validity has been taken to constitute one main explananda for philosophical accounts judgment. But is really case most people spontaneously having...

10.1111/mila.12210 article EN Mind & Language 2018-08-01

Norenzayan and colleagues argue that culturally evolved beliefs in monitoring punishing supernatural agents contributed to the expansion of large-scale cooperation. Previous studies showed Western participants primed with God concept anonymous dictator games tended be more prosocial. However, there is a lack would investigate karmic its effect on pro-sociality, thus expanding scope punishment hypothesis. The current study one first attempts address question belief karma relation prosocial...

10.1080/10508619.2019.1696497 article EN International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2019-12-12

10.1007/s41809-019-00045-1 article EN Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2019-11-02

Abstract People vary both in their embrace of society’s traditions, and perception hazards as salient necessitating a response. Over evolutionary time, traditions have offered avenues for addressing hazards, plausibly resulting linkages between orientations toward tradition danger. Emerging research documents connections traditionalism threat responsivity, including pathogen-avoidance motivations. Additionally, because hazard-mitigating behaviors can conflict with competing priorities,...

10.1038/s41598-023-29655-0 article EN cc-by Scientific Reports 2023-04-11

Philosophers have long debated whether, if determinism is true, we should hold people morally responsible for their actions since in a deterministic universe, are arguably not the ultimate source of nor could they done otherwise initial conditions and laws nature held fixed. To reveal how non-philosophers ordinarily reason about free will, conducted cross-cultural cross-linguistic survey (N = 5,268) spanning twenty countries sixteen languages. Overall, participants tended to ascribe moral...

10.31234/osf.io/j248d preprint EN 2019-10-15

Many people believe that certain mental states, such as love, continue after physical death. However, the prevalence of ``continuity beliefs'' and their relationship with culture religious belief remains unclear. In current preregistered study we draw on a large diverse cross-cultural sample (24 countries, N = 10,195) to systematically quantify cultural variation in tendencies for continuity beliefs death precedence state (e.g., love) over bodily hunger). Our findings partly replicate...

10.31234/osf.io/tvycp preprint EN 2023-02-03

Is behavioral integration (i.e., which occurs when a subject’s assertion that p matches her nonverbal behavior) necessary feature of belief in folk psychology? Our data fromover 5,000 people across 26 samples, spanning 22 countries suggests it is not. Given the surprising cross-cultural robustness our findings, we argue types evidence for ascription are, at least some circumstances, lexicographically ordered: assertions are first taken into account, and an agent sincerely asserts p,...

10.1002/tht3.248 article EN Thought A Journal of Philosophy 2017-01-01

People tend to evaluate information from reliable sources more favourably, but it is unclear exactly how perceivers' worldviews interact with this source credibility effect. In a large and diverse cross-cultural sample (N = 10,195 24 countries), we presented participants obscure, meaningless statements attributed either spiritual guru or scientist. We found robust global effect for scientific authorities, which dub `the Einstein effect': across all countries scientists hold greater authority...

10.31234/osf.io/sf8ez preprint EN 2020-12-01

People vary in the extent to which they embrace their society’s traditions, impacting a range of social and political phenomena. also degree perceive disparate dangers as salient necessitating response. Over evolutionary time, traditions likely regularly offered direct indirect avenues for addressing hazards; consequently, via multiple possible pathways, orientations toward tradition danger may have become associated. Emerging research documents connections between individual differences...

10.31234/osf.io/mduw8 preprint EN 2022-07-09

Abstract Believing that your life is shaped by internal forces, such as own free will, usually thought to lead positive outcomes, being prosocial and happy. it external deterministic laws of nature, negative outcomes. However, whether the case might vary with culture nature force, specifically, force teleological. To test this, we investigated beliefs in five countries: China, India, Lithuania, Mongolia, USA. We importance choice (an internal, teleological force), gods fate (external,...

10.1007/s41809-023-00139-x article EN cc-by Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2024-02-06
Coming Soon ...