A5082752736- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Religious and Theological Studies
- Literary and Cultural Studies
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Psychology of Social Influence
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Educational theories and practices
- Cultural and political discourse analysis
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Language and cultural evolution
- Philosophical Thought and Analysis
- Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Psychology and Mental Health
- Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Regional Development and Innovation
- Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
2003-2024
Instituto de Filosofía
2016-2024
Swarthmore College
2011
Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat judgments in same way as typical expressions subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, property being right or wrong regardless disagreement. Moreover, this apparent validity has been taken to constitute one main explananda for philosophical accounts judgment. But is really case most people spontaneously having...
Philosophers have long debated whether, if determinism is true, we should hold people morally responsible for their actions since in a deterministic universe, are arguably not the ultimate source of nor could they done otherwise initial conditions and laws nature held fixed. To reveal how non-philosophers ordinarily reason about free will, conducted cross-cultural cross-linguistic survey (N = 5,268) spanning twenty countries sixteen languages. Overall, participants tended to ascribe moral...
Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat judgments in same way as typical expressions subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, property being right or wrong regardless disagreement. Moreover, this apparent validity has been taken to constitute one main explananda for philosophical accounts judgment. But is really case most people spontaneously having...
Abstract Two prevailing accounts of the structure mind have been provided, respectively, by Dual System Theory and Massive Modularity Hypothesis. It has claimed, however, that they cannot both be true at same time, i.e., are incompatible and, thus, one them must abandoned. I will offer some arguments to challenge this claim. show a plausible understanding each theory makes it possible for time. Moreover, argue appealing other can more complete detailed account architecture mind. Keywords:...
En este ensayo exploramos una perspectiva epistemológica en la que el elemento social y colectivo del conocimiento juega un papel fundamental explicación de su producción transmisión. Primero presentamos criticamos posición individualista ha sido dominante epistemología contemporánea cuyas raíces pueden trazarse, al menos, hasta Descartes. Posteriormente introducimos defendemos nuestra propia mirada, es proceso constituido por conjunto actividades prácticas tiene carácter material objetivo.
Abstract We examine two major perspectives in the literature on domain specificity cognition: one of them cognitive modules are "intuitive theories"; other they dispositional structures. Both these positions accept that there is a continuous line from ordinary to scientific reasoning; nevertheless interpret this continuity differently. propose an alternative way understanding relation between and reasoning: thesis holds because heuristic structures play fundamental role both types reasoning....
We sought to follow up reports that perceived distance is reduced when wielding a tool extends reach. Several studies have contrasted estimation between groups reached target using only their hand and tool. The present study aimed replicate one such finding, which used an “implicit” measure of (triangle aspect ratio). Because others shown people overestimate how far they can reach (and underestimate distances along table), we test whether reaching with one's provided feedback for future...
El texto es una reseña crítica del libro de Zenia Yébenes intitulado Hechos Tiempo.
La injusticia epistémica suele pensarse como una forma de exclusión. Así hay distintas formas y grados exclusión, las epistémica. Aquí argumento que herramienta fundamental para el combate sus casos más robustos es la escucha, entendida disposición a dejarse afectar por otras personas. idea central escuchar tiene dimensión colectiva depende reestructuración relaciones sociales. Para defender esto, presento algunas maneras clásicas concebir hermenéutica. Posteriormente hago ver su relación...
En años recientes se han diseñado múltiples experimentos que muestran cómo el razonamiento humano tiende a quebrantar lo usualmente consideran los principios normativos de razonamiento, saber, la teoría estándar probabilidad y lógica clásica. Estos supuestos quebrantos sido interpretados como muestra irracionalidad humana. Una noción norma del diferente subyacente en dicha interpretación me permite afirmar razonar correctamente implica acuerdo con reglas diseñadas para resolver una clase...
Defenderé que la búsqueda de justicia implica una reconfiguración completa del espacio público y transformación (radical) nuestras relaciones sociales. Argumentaré desde vía negativa, es decir, comprensión injusticia epistémica. Ésta ilustra cómo el daño injustificado se origina en estructura las acontecen sociedades reales. Para lograr mi objetivo haré dialogar a dos debates filosóficos distintos —aquél centra noción habla sobre epistémica—. Esto hará visible epistemología tiene dimensión...
<p class="p1">Dos posiciones dominantes en el ámbito de las teorías sobre la justificación epistémica son “internismo” y “externismo”. Se afirma que intuiciones subyacentes a cada una ellas contradictorias y, por tanto, no es posible hacerlas converger sola teoría. Haré ver esto último sólo posible, sino necesario. Para ello apelaré lateoría dual sistemas argumentaré si (1) como esta teoría, habilidades razonamiento los seres humanos están estructuradas dos diferentes, entonces (2)...
Diana I. Pérez y Antoni Gomila, Social Cognition and the Second Person in Human Interaction, Routledge, Nueva York, 2022, 194pp., ISBN 978–0–367–67859–3 (hbk); 978–0–367–67857–9 (pbk); 978–1–003–13315–5 (ebk)