Arleen Salles

ORCID: 0000-0002-1397-7932
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Law, Ethics, and AI Impact
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Latin American Cultural Politics
  • Biomedical and Engineering Education
  • Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Science, Research, and Medicine
  • Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Biotechnology and Related Fields
  • Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Medicine, History, and Philosophy

Uppsala University
2016-2024

Instituto de Neurología de Buenos Aires
2022-2023

Centro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares
2012-2022

Biogem
2022

University of Philosophical Research
2014-2022

Creative Commons
2022

European Union
2022

Cornell University
2021

Instituto de Filosofía
2010-2020

CIUDAD
2010-2020

Katrin Amunts Markus Axer Swati Banerjee Lise Bitsch Jan G. Bjaalie and 95 more Philipp Brauner Andrea Brovelli Navona Calarco Marcel Carrère Svenja Caspers Christine J. Charvet Sven Cichon Roshan Cools Irene Costantini Egidio D’Angelo G. De Bonis Gustavo Deco Javier DeFelipe Alain Destexhe Timo Dickscheid Markus Diesmann Emrah Düzel Simon B. Eickhoff Gaute T. Einevoll Damian Eke Andreas K. Engel Alan C. Evans Kathinka Evers Nataliia Fedorchenko Stephanie J. Forkel J. Fousek Angela D. Friederici Karl Friston Steve Furber Liesbet Geris Rainer Goebel Onur Güntürkün Aini Ismafairus Abd Hamid Christina Herold Claus C. Hilgetag Sabine M. Hölter Yannis Ioannidis Viktor Jirsa Sriranga Kashyap Burkhard S. Kasper Alban de Kerchove d’Exaerde Roxana N. Kooijmans István Koren Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski Gregory Kiar Wouter Klijn Lars Klüver Alois Knoll Željka Krsnik Julia Kämpfer Matthew E. Larkum Marja‐Leena Linne Thomas Lippert Jafri Malin Abdullah Paola Di Maio Neville Magielse Pierre Maquet Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro Daniele Marinazzo Jorge F. Mejías Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg Michele Migliore Judith Michael Yannick Morel Fabrice O. Morin Lars Muckli Guy Nagels Lena Oden Nicola Palomero‐Gallagher Fanis Panagiotaropoulos Pier Stanislao Paolucci Cyriel M. A. Pennartz Liesbet M. Peeters Spase Petkoski Nicolai Petkov Lucy S. Petro Mihai A. Petrovici Giovanni Pezzulo Pieter R. Roelfsema Laurence Ris Petra Ritter Kathleen S. Rockland Stefan Rotter Andreas Rowald Sabine Ruland Philippe Ryvlin Arleen Salles Maria V. Sánchez‐Vives Johannes Schemmel Walter Senn Alexandra A. de Sousa Felix Ströckens Bertrand Thirion Kâmil Uludağ Simo Vanni

Abstract In recent years, brain research has indisputably entered a new epoch, driven by substantial methodological advances and digitally enabled data integration modelling at multiple scales—from molecules to the whole brain. Major are emerging intersection of neuroscience with technology computing. This science combines high-quality research, across scales, culture multidisciplinary large-scale collaboration, translation into applications. As pioneered in Europe’s Human Brain Project...

10.1162/imag_a_00137 article EN cc-by Imaging Neuroscience 2024-04-01

Drawing on more than eight years working to implement Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the Human Brain Project, a large EU-funded research project that brings together neuroscience, computing, social sciences, humanities, one of largest investments RRI project, this article offers insights explores its possible future. We focus question how can have long-lasting impact persist beyond time horizon funded projects. For purpose, we suggest concept 'responsibility by design' which is...

10.1080/23299460.2021.1955613 article EN cc-by Journal of Responsible Innovation 2021-05-04

Recently, some have proposed moral bioenhancement as a solution to the serious evils that humans face. Seemingly disillusioned with traditional methods of education, proponents believe we should pursue and apply biotechnological means morally enhance human beings. Such proposal has generated lively debate about permissibility bioenhancement. We argue here such is specious. The claim - whether permissible or not problems affect beings based on several problematic framing assumptions. evaluate...

10.1111/bioe.12100 article EN Bioethics 2014-06-09

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is an important ethical, legal, political theme for the European Commission. Although variously defined, it generally understood as interactive process that engages social actors, researchers, innovators who must be mutually responsive work towards ethical permissibility of relevant research its products. The framework RRI calls contextually addressing not just innovation impact but also background process, specially societal visions underlying norms...

10.1007/s12152-018-9372-9 article EN cc-by Neuroethics 2018-06-07

Neuroscience research has been expanding, providing new insights into brain and nervous system function potentially transformative technological applications. In recent years, there a flurry of prominent international scientific academies intergovernmental organizations calling for engagement with different publics on social, ethical, regulatory issues related to neuroscience neurotechnology advances. Neuroscientific activities outputs are value-laden; they reflect the cultural, political...

10.3389/fcomm.2022.909964 article EN cc-by Frontiers in Communication 2022-12-21

Abstract Ethical reflection on Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a priority. In this article, we propose methodological model for comprehensive ethical analysis of some uses AI, notably as replacement human actors in specific activities. We emphasize the need conceptual clarification relevant key terms (e.g., intelligence) order to undertake such reflection. Against that background, distinguish two levels analysis, one practical and theoretical. Focusing state AI at present, suggest...

10.1007/s11948-020-00238-w article EN cc-by Science and Engineering Ethics 2020-07-07

Responsible Research and Innovation is promoted by research funders scientific communities as a way to place societal needs values at the centre of innovation. In practice, however, legal compliance still tends dominate RRI agenda. order move beyond dominance address broader agenda, this article argues that requires: (1) productive intertwining practice; (2) integration anticipation, reflection, engagement, action (AREA) in non-linear process; (3) an experimental approach. Based on...

10.1080/23299460.2022.2094071 article EN cc-by Journal of Responsible Innovation 2022-07-18

The recently published BRAIN 2.0 Neuroethics Report offers a very helpful overview of the possible ethical, social, philosophical, and legal issues raised by neuroscience in context BRAIN's research priorities thus contributing to attempt develop ethically sound neuroscience. In this article, we turn running theme document: need for an ethical framework Initiative further integration neuroethics We assess some provide explanation how have addressed them Human Brain Project. offer our...

10.1080/21507740.2020.1778116 article EN cc-by-nc-nd AJOB Neuroscience 2020-07-02

In this article, we begin by identifying three main neuroethical approaches: neurobioethics, empirical neuroethics, and conceptual neuroethics. Our focus is on approaches that generally emphasize the need to develop use a methodological modus operandi for effectively linking scientific (i.e., neuroscience) philosophical ethics) interpretations. We explain assess value of neuroethics defend one such approach propose as being particularly fruitful addressing various issues raised neuroscience:...

10.1017/s0963180118000208 article EN Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2018-09-10

This paper examines the notion of capability development through lens Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). It describes how RRI capabilities can be promoted developed capacity-building activities by drawing on a reflection experiences some members Ethics Society team EU-funded Human Brain Project (HBP) who have contributed to an extensive capacity building programme for HBP researchers, EBRAINS research infrastructure developers users, as well interested external audiences. also...

10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100065 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Journal of Responsible Technology 2023-08-12

Within the last decades, brain science has been offering new insights into relationship among diverse psychological processes and neural correlates of our moral thought behavior. Despite distinction between explanatory/descriptive nature normative morality, some neuroethicists have claimed that neuroscientific findings implications. In this paper, I identify three interpretations claim. The first focuses on neuroscience’s role in explaining origin morality values how neurobiology is bases A...

10.6035/recerca.2013.13.3 article EN cc-by Recerca Revista de pensament i anàlisi 2013-01-01
Coming Soon ...