Iswanto Sucandy
A5056184815- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
- Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Esophageal and GI Pathology
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
- Liver physiology and pathology
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Body Contouring and Surgery
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
AdventHealth Tampa
2017-2025
University of Oslo
2023-2024
University of Zurich
2024
ETH Zurich
2024
Walsh University
2024
University of Central Florida
2020-2024
Oslo University Hospital
2023-2024
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
2024
Marche Polytechnic University
2024
University of Hong Kong
2022-2023
Laparoscopic and robotic techniques have both been well adopted as safe options in selected patients undergoing hepatectomy. However, it is unknown whether either approach superior, especially for major hepatectomy such right or extended (RH/ERH).To compare the outcomes of vs laparoscopic RH/ERH.In this case-control study, propensity score matching analysis was performed to minimize selection bias. Patients RH/EHR at 29 international centers from 2008 2020 were included.Robotic RH/ERH.Data...
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes robotic liver surgery (RLS) and laparoscopic (LLS) in various settings. Summary Background Data: Clear advantages RLS over LLS have rarely been demonstrated, associated costs are generally higher than those surgery. Therefore, exact role approach minimally invasive remains be defined. Methods: In international retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent for all indications between 2009 2021 34 hepatobiliary...
Abstract Background Minimally invasive right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) is a technically challenging procedure. This study was designed to determine outcomes following robotic RPS (R-RPS) and laparoscopic (L-RPS). Methods An international multicentre retrospective analysis of patients undergoing R-RPS versus those who had purely L-RPS at 21 centres from 2010 2019 performed. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, postoperative were analysed retrospectively central database....
To compare the outcomes between robotic major hepatectomy (R-MH) and laparoscopic (L-MH).Robotic techniques may overcome limitations of liver resection. However, it is unknown whether R-MH superior to L-MH.This a post hoc analysis multicenter database patients undergoing or L-MH at 59 international centers from 2008 2021. Data on patient demographics, center experience volume, perioperative outcomes, tumor characteristics were collected analyzed. Both 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM)...
Robotic liver resections (RLR) may have the ability to address some of drawbacks laparoscopic (LLR) but few studies done a head-to-head comparison outcomes after anterolateral segment by two techniques.A retrospective study was conducted 3202 patients who underwent minimally invasive LR segments at 26 international centres from 2005 2020. Two thousand six hundred and cases met criteria which there were 358 RLR 1868 LLR cases. Perioperative compared between groups using 1:3 Propensity Score...
Abstract Background Limited liver resections (LLRs) for tumours located in the posterosuperior segments of are technically demanding procedures. This study compared outcomes robotic (R) and laparoscopic (L) LLR (IV, VII, VIII). Methods was an international multicentre retrospective analysis patients who underwent R-LLR or L-LLR at 24 centres between 2010 2019. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, postoperative were analysed; 1 : 3 propensity score matching (PSM) coarsened exact...
To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators after laparoscopic liver resections (L-LR).There is limited published data to date on the best achievable L-LR.This a post hoc analysis of multicenter database 11,983 patients undergoing L-LR in 45 international centers 4 continents between 2015 and 2020. Three specific procedures: left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), hepatectomy (LH), right (RH) were selected represent 3 difficulty levels L-LR. Fifteen outcome cutoffs.There 3519 (LLS, LH, RH)...
Objective: To compare the outcomes of robotic limited liver resections (RLLR) versus laparoscopic (LLLR) posterosuperior segments. Background: Both and have been used for tumors in However, comparative performance safety both approaches not well examined existing literature. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis multicenter database 5,446 patients who underwent RLLR or LLLR segments (I, IVa, VII VIII) at 60 international centers between 2008 2021. Data on baseline demographics, center...
Both robotic and laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy central hepatectomy can be performed safely in expert centres, with excellent outcomes. The approach was associated statistically significant less blood loss compared laparoscopy, although the clinical relevance of this finding remains unclear.
The nascent robotic approach for hepatic resections is gaining momentum in the United States because it offers solutions to known limitations of laparoscopic approach. Herein, we report our initial experience and short-term outcomes first 100 hepatectomies. With Institutional Review Board approval, all patients undergoing hepatectomy were prospectively followed up. Patient demographics, operative outcomes, complications, 30-day readmissions collected analyzed. Data are presented as median...