Arpad Ivanecz
A5004522479- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
- Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
- Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
- Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
- Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Management of metastatic bone disease
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Esophageal and GI Pathology
University Clinical Centre Maribor
2016-2025
University of Maribor
2006-2025
Tongji Hospital
2024
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
2024
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
2023
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
2022
Seoul National University Hospital
2022
Splošna Bolnišnica Celje
2002-2003
Objective: To develop and update evidence- consensus-based guidelines on laparoscopic robotic pancreatic surgery. Summary Background Data: Minimally invasive surgery (MIPS), including surgery, is complex technically demanding. Minimizing the risk for patients requires stringent, evidence-based guidelines. Since International Miami Guidelines MIPS in 2019, new developments key publications have been reported, necessitating an update. Methods: Evidence-based 22 topics 8 domains were proposed:...
Abstract Background Western multicenter studies on distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR), also known as the Appleby procedure, for locally advanced pancreatic cancer are lacking. We aimed to study overall survival, morbidity, mortality and impact of preoperative hepatic artery embolization (PHAE). Methods Retrospective cohort within European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary-Association, DP-CAR between 1-1-2000 6-1-2016. Primary endpoint was survival. Secondary endpoints...
To compare the outcomes between robotic major hepatectomy (R-MH) and laparoscopic (L-MH).Robotic techniques may overcome limitations of liver resection. However, it is unknown whether R-MH superior to L-MH.This a post hoc analysis multicenter database patients undergoing or L-MH at 59 international centers from 2008 2021. Data on patient demographics, center experience volume, perioperative outcomes, tumor characteristics were collected analyzed. Both 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM)...
Robotic liver resections (RLR) may have the ability to address some of drawbacks laparoscopic (LLR) but few studies done a head-to-head comparison outcomes after anterolateral segment by two techniques.A retrospective study was conducted 3202 patients who underwent minimally invasive LR segments at 26 international centres from 2005 2020. Two thousand six hundred and cases met criteria which there were 358 RLR 1868 LLR cases. Perioperative compared between groups using 1:3 Propensity Score...
To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators after laparoscopic liver resections (L-LR).There is limited published data to date on the best achievable L-LR.This a post hoc analysis of multicenter database 11,983 patients undergoing L-LR in 45 international centers 4 continents between 2015 and 2020. Three specific procedures: left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), hepatectomy (LH), right (RH) were selected represent 3 difficulty levels L-LR. Fifteen outcome cutoffs.There 3519 (LLS, LH, RH)...
Objective: To compare the outcomes of robotic limited liver resections (RLLR) versus laparoscopic (LLLR) posterosuperior segments. Background: Both and have been used for tumors in However, comparative performance safety both approaches not well examined existing literature. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis multicenter database 5,446 patients who underwent RLLR or LLLR segments (I, IVa, VII VIII) at 60 international centers between 2008 2021. Data on baseline demographics, center...
A previous pilot study proved the feasibility, safety and efficacy of electrochemotherapy in treatment colorectal liver metastases. The aim this was to evaluate long-term effectiveness unresectable metastases.In prospective phase II study, patients with metachronous metastases were included. In all patients, at least one metastasis due its central location or a too-small future remnant volume. Patients treated by using intravenously administered bleomycin during open surgery. Treated 84 39...
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a minimally invasive approach for the surgical treatment of neoplasms in pancreas. This study aimed to compare this open procedure. A retrospective analysis prospectively maintained database 400 pancreatectomies was performed. The laparoscopic group (LDP) compared (ODP). propensity score matching (PSM) From 2016 2023, 108 were carried out, 19 (17.6%) laparoscopically and 89 (82.4%) openly. conversion rate 13.6%. severe morbidity rates 28.1% ODP group,...
Journal Article Recurrence patterns and post-recurrence survival of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases: international multicentre retrospective study Get access Bilobar CRC Liver Metastases Research Collaborative Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar British Surgery, Volume 112, Issue 3, March 2025, znaf003, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf003 Published: 04 2025 history Received: 19 2024 Revision received: 24 September Accepted: 03 January
The aim of the study was to compare outcome pure laparoscopic and open simultaneous resection both primary colorectal cancer synchronous liver metastases (SCLM).From 2000 2016 all patients treated by were assessed for entry in this single center, clinically nonrandomized trial. A propensity score matching used group (LAP) surgery (OPEN). Primary endpoints perioperative oncologic outcomes. Secondary overall survival (OS) disease-free (DFS).Of 82 identified who underwent SCLM, 10 LAP. All...
Although laparoscopic liver resection has become the standard for minor resections, evidence is lacking more complex resections such as right posterior sectionectomy (RPS). We aimed to compare surgical outcomes between (LRPS) and open (ORPS).An international multicenter retrospective study comparing patients undergoing LRPS or ORPS (January 2007-December 2018) was performed. Patients were matched based on propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint major complication rate defined...
Presently, according to different difficulty scoring systems, there is no difference in complexity estimation of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) segments 7 and 8. However, published data supporting this assumption. To date, studies have compared the outcomes parenchyma-sparing 8.A post hoc analysis patients undergoing LLR 8 46 centers between 2004 2020 was performed. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) used compare isolated Subset analyses were also performed atypical resections...
Recent reports have shown that patients with vascular tumour invasion who undergo concurrent resection can achieve long-term survival rates equivalent to those without involvement requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy alone. There is no consensus about which benefit from the portal-superior mesenteric vein and there best surgical technique of vessel reconstruction (resection or graft reconstruction). As published series are small aim this study was evaluate our experience in pancreatectomies en...
Abstract Background This study aimed to externally validate and upgrade the recent difficulty scoring system (DSS) proposed by Halls et al. predict intraoperative complications (IOC) during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Methods The DSS was validated in a cohort of 128 consecutive patients undergoing pure LLRs between 2008 2019 at single tertiary referral center. includes four levels based on five risk factors (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, previous open resection, lesion type, size...