A5015608821- Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Occupational exposure and asthma
- Food Safety and Hygiene
- French Historical and Cultural Studies
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
- Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Identification and Quantification in Food
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- French Urban and Social Studies
- Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies
- Agricultural safety and regulations
- Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
- French Literature and Critical Theory
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
- Medieval European Literature and History
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Diabetes and associated disorders
- Transgenic Plants and Applications
University of Manchester
2022
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
2020
Unilever (United Kingdom)
2010-2019
Unilever (Netherlands)
2009-2014
University of Bedfordshire
2013
International Life Sciences Institute Europe
2007
Radboud University Nijmegen
2007
A maximization test (after Magnusson & Kligman 1970), a single injection adjuvant (SIAT) and modified Draize procedure for assessing contact sensitization potential in guinea‐pigs have been compared their ability to detect 19 known human sensitizers. The results show that the is good screening particularly strong very stringent of potential, able some marginal sensitivity SIAT sufficiently similar act as an alternative routine testing, view its practical advantages over procedure.
Summary Background There is an emerging consensus that, as with other risks in society, zero risk for food‐allergic people not a realistic or attainable option. Food allergy challenge data and new assessment methods offer the opportunity to develop quantitative limits unintended allergenic ingredients which can be used risk‐based approaches. However, prerequisite their application defining tolerable level of risk. This requires value judgement ultimately ‘societal’ decision that has involve...
Understanding consumer perceptions is crucial if effective food safety policy and risk communication are to be developed implemented. We sought understand how those living with allergy assess precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) their preference in risks communicated within a quantitative assessment (QRA) framework.The Integrated Approaches Food Allergen Allergy Risk Management (iFAAM) online survey was for adults parents of children distributed across Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain...