Martin Ringsten

ORCID: 0000-0003-4456-9760
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Activity and Health

Lund University
2021-2025

Skåne University Hospital
2022-2025

Innovation Skåne (Sweden)
2025

A systematic review (SR) attempts to find, assess and summarize all the empirical evidence answer a specific research question. We aim explore what extent reviews are included in doctoral theses from universities with medical faculty Sweden, describe type, topic methodological quality of reviews. Duplicate assessors independently searched local national repositories for published 2021 within seven faculties categorized identified based on topic, using AMSTAR-2. 5.4% (45/852) review, 1.3%...

10.1002/cesm.70015 article EN cc-by Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods 2025-01-01

To systematically evaluate timely reporting of clinical trial results at medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries. In this cross-sectional study, we included trials (regardless intervention) registered European Union (EU) Clinical Trials Registry and/or ClinicalTrials.gov, completed 2016-2019 led by a with faculty or hospital Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden. We identified summary posted registries conducted systematic manual searches for publications...

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111710 article EN cc-by Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2025-02-01

To assess whether recommendations of individually oriented lifestyle interventions (IOLIs) in guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) were underpinned by evidence benefit, harms opportunity costs considered.Cross sectional survey.UK.NICE supporting evidence.All NICE pathways IOLI (ie, non-drug that healthcare professionals administer to adults achieve a healthier improve health) searched systematically on 26 August 2020. One author screened all retrieved...

10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000130 article EN cc-by-nc BMJ Medicine 2022-09-01

Abstract Background The aim of the INSPECT-SR project is to develop a tool identify problematic RCTs in systematic reviews. In Stage 1 project, list potential trustworthiness checks was created. on this must be evaluated determine which should included tool. Methods We attempted apply 72 50 Cochrane Reviews. For each, we recorded whether check passed, failed or possibly failed, it not feasible complete check. Following application checks, had concerns about authenticity each RCT. repeated...

10.1101/2024.11.25.24316905 preprint EN cc-by medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2024-11-26

Assess the extent to which clinical trial registration and reporting policies of 25 world's largest public philanthropic medical research funders meet best practice benchmarks as stipulated by 2017 WHO Joint Statement, document changes in monitoring systems 19 European over past year.Cross-sectional study, based on assessments each funder's publicly available documentation plus validation results funders. Our cohort includes Europe, Oceania, South Asia, Canada.Scoring all using an 11-item...

10.1017/cts.2023.590 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2023-01-01

Abstract Objective To systematically evaluate timely reporting of clinical trial results at medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries. Study Design Setting In this cross-sectional study, we included trials (regardless intervention) registered EU Clinical Trials Registry and/or ClinicalTrials.gov, completed 2016-2019, led by a with faculty or hospital Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden. We identified summary posted registries, conducted systematic manual...

10.1101/2024.02.04.24301363 preprint EN cc-by medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2024-02-05

Abstract Background Risk of bias (RoB) assessment is an essential part systematic reviews treatment effect. RoB requires reviewers to read and understand each eligible trial depends on a sound understanding methods tools. highly skilled task, subject human error, can be time-consuming expensive. Machine learning-based tools have been developed streamline the process using relatively simple models trained limited corpuses. ChatGPT conversational agent based large language model (LLM) that was...

10.21203/rs.3.rs-3288515/v1 preprint EN cc-by Research Square (Research Square) 2023-09-08

Abstract Objectives Assess the extent to which clinical trial registration and reporting policies of 25 world’s largest public philanthropic medical research funders meet best practice benchmarks as stipulated by 2017 WHO Joint Statement,(1) document changes in monitoring systems 19 European over past year. Design, Setting, Participants Cross sectional study, based on assessments each funder’s publicly available documentation plus validation results funders. Our cohort includes Europe,...

10.1101/2023.04.05.23288169 preprint EN medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2023-04-06

Abstract Transparency shortcomings can undermine confidence in the safety and efficacy of vaccines. This study assesses publication status disclosure gaps a cohort 71 clinical trials assessing 3 COVID-19 vaccines developed by Chinese biopharmaceutical companies that received World Health Organization Emergency Use Listing (EUL) have been marketed globally. We searched trial registries scientific literature to assess completion those trials, determine whether outcomes completed made publicly...

10.1101/2024.03.17.24304386 preprint EN cc-by medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2024-03-18

Abstract Objective Systematic reviews (SRs) are essential to ensure that decisions informed by an up-to-date and complete understanding of the relevant research evidence. Conducting SRs within a doctoral thesis can reduce redundant, harmful unethical research, identify knowledge gaps, help student obtain important skills conduct use research. The output learning process overlaps with aims programs. We aim explore what extent included in theses from all medical faculties Sweden, describe...

10.1101/2024.06.11.24307851 preprint EN cc-by medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2024-06-11

Abstract This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: to assess efficacy of interventions aiming improve outdoor mobility people with disability and explore if varies between different populations intervention components.

10.1002/cl2.1280 article EN cc-by Campbell Systematic Reviews 2022-10-06

BackgroundOlder adults have a high prevalence of chronic pain, which can substantial effect on their health and quality life. Patients’ use effective pain relief methods is central part the treatment management pain. The utilization perceived effectiveness are important knowledge for treating managing clinicians older adults. However, this has been poorly investigated.AimWe aimed to survey used by people treat manage as well effectiveness.MethodsA total 2,000 questionnaires were sent random...

10.1016/j.pmn.2023.08.006 article EN cc-by Pain Management Nursing 2023-09-06
Coming Soon ...