Warren Tierney

ORCID: 0000-0001-8898-1648
Publications
Citations
Views
---
Saved
---
About
Contact & Profiles
Research Areas
  • Religion and Society Interactions
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Religion, Society, and Development
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Religious Education and Schools
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Child Therapy and Development
  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

INSEAD
2016-2024

University of Limerick
2012-2020

European School of Management and Technology
2018

INSEAD
2016

To what extent are research results influenced by subjective decisions that scientists make as they design studies? Fifteen teams independently designed studies to answer five original questions related moral judgments, negotiations, and implicit cognition. Participants from 2 separate large samples (total N > 15,000) were then randomly assigned complete 1 version of each study. Effect sizes varied dramatically across different sets materials test the same hypothesis: Materials rendered...

10.1037/bul0000220 article EN Psychological Bulletin 2020-01-16

This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they published. Our goal is establish non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replications all ten moral judgment effects last author and his...

10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001 article EN cc-by-nc-nd Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2016-03-24
Martin Schweinsberg Michael B. Feldman Nicola Staub Olmo R. van den Akker Robbie C. M. van Aert and 95 more Marcel A. L. M. van Assen Yang Liu Tim Althoff Jeffrey Heer Alex Kale Zainab Mohamed Hashem Amireh Vaishali Venkatesh Prasad Abraham Bernstein Emily V. Robinson Kaisa Snellman S. Amy Sommer Sarah M. G. Otner David Robinson Nikhil Madan Raphael Silberzahn Pavel Goldstein Warren Tierney Toshio Murase Benjamin Mandl Domenico Viganola Carolin Strobl Catherine Schaumans Stijn Kelchtermans Chan Naseeb S. Mason Garrison Tal Yarkoni C.S. Richard Chan Prestone Adie Paulius Alaburda Casper J. Albers Sara Alspaugh Jeff Alstott Andrew A. Nelson Eduardo Ariño de la Rubia Arzi Adbi Štěpán Bahník Jason Min Baik Laura Winther Balling Sachin Banker David A. A. Baranger Dale J. Barr Brenda A. Barros-Rivera Matt Bauer Blaise Manga Enuh Lisa Boelen Katerina Bohle Carbonell Robert A. Briers Oliver Burkhard Miguel-Angel Canela Laura Castrillo Timothy Catlett Olivia Chen Michael Clark Brent Cohn Alex Coppock Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet Paul Curran Wilson Cyrus-Lai David Dai Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva Henrik Danielsson Rosaria de F.S.M. Russo Niko de Silva Curdin Derungs Frank Dondelinger Carolina Duarte de Souza Blessing Dube Marina Dubova Ben Mark Dunn Peter A. Edelsbrunner Sara Finley Nick C. Fox Timo Gnambs Yuanyuan Gong Erin Grand Brandon Greenawalt Han Dan Paul H. P. Hanel Antony B. Hong David D. Hood Justin Hsueh Lilian Huang Kent Ngan‐Cheung Hui Keith A. Hultman Azka Javaid Lily J. Jiang Jonathan Jong Jash Kamdar David Kane Gregor Kappler Erikson Kaszubowski Christopher Kavanagh Madian Khabsa Bennett Kleinberg

In this crowdsourced initiative, independent analysts used the same dataset to test two hypotheses regarding effects of scientists' gender and professional status on verbosity during group meetings. Not only analytic approach but also operationalizations key variables were left unconstrained up individual analysts. For instance, could choose operationalize as job title, institutional ranking, citation counts, or some combination. To maximize transparency process by which choices are made, a...

10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.02.003 article EN cc-by Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2021-06-17

Drawing on the concept of a gale creative destruction in capitalistic economy, we argue that initiatives to assess robustness findings organizational literature should aim simultaneously test competing ideas operating same theoretical space. In other words, replication efforts seek not just support or question original findings, but also replace them with revised, stronger theories greater explanatory power. Achieving this will typically require adding new measures, conditions, and subject...

10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002 article EN cc-by Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2020-09-29

Science is often perceived to be a self-correcting enterprise. In principle, the assessment of scientific claims supposed proceed in cumulative fashion, with reigning theories day progressively approximating truth more accurately over time. practice, however, self-correction tends less efficiently than one might naively suppose. Far from evaluating new evidence dispassionately and infallibly, individual scientists cling stubbornly prior findings. Here we explore dynamics at an rather...

10.1177/1745691620964106 article EN cc-by Perspectives on Psychological Science 2021-03-01

How can we maximize what is learned from a replication study? In the creative destruction approach to replication, original hypothesis compared not only null hypothesis, but also predictions derived multiple alternative theoretical accounts of phenomenon. To this end, new populations and measures are included in design addition ones, help determine which theory best for results across key outcomes contexts. The present pre-registered empirical project Implicit Puritanism account intuitive...

10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060 article EN cc-by Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2020-12-03

Science is often perceived to be a self-correcting enterprise. In principle, the assessment of scientific claims supposed proceed in cumulative fashion, with reigning theories day progressively approximating truth more accurately over time. practice, however, self-correction tends less efficiently than one might naively suppose. Far from evaluating new evidence dispassionately and infallibly, individual scientists cling stubbornly prior findings. Here we explore dynamics at an rather...

10.31234/osf.io/exmb2 preprint EN 2018-12-12

10.1177/25152459241268293 article EN cc-by-nc Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2024-10-01

To what extent are research results influenced by subjective decisions that scientists make as they design studies? Fifteen teams independently designed studies to answer five original questions related moral judgments, negotiations, and implicit cognition. Participants from two separate large samples (total N > 15,000) were then randomly assigned complete one version of each study. Effect sizes varied dramatically across different sets materials test the same hypothesis: rendered...

10.2139/ssrn.3654406 article EN SSRN Electronic Journal 2020-01-01

Abstract We present the data from a crowdsourced project seeking to replicate findings in independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. In this Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) initiative, 25 research groups attempted 10 moral judgment effects single laboratory’s pipeline of unpublished findings. The were investigated using online/lab surveys containing psychological manipulations (vignettes) followed by questionnaires. Results revealed mix reliable,...

10.1038/sdata.2016.82 article EN cc-by Scientific Data 2016-10-10

We tested whether large language models (LLMs) can help predict results from a complex behavioural science experiment. In study 1, we investigated the performance of widely used LLMs GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in forecasting empirical findings large-scale experimental emotions, gender, social perceptions. found that GPT-4, but not GPT-3.5, matched cohort 119 human experts, with correlations 0.89 (GPT-4), 0.07 (GPT-3.5) 0.87 (human experts) between aggregated forecasts realized effect sizes. 2,...

10.1098/rsos.240682 article EN cc-by Royal Society Open Science 2024-09-01

Abstract Demonstrating the limitations of one-at-a-time approach, crowd initiatives reveal surprisingly powerful role analytic and design choices in shaping scientific results. At same time, cross-cultural variability effects is far below levels initially expected. This highlights value “medium” science, leveraging diverse stimulus sets extensive robustness checks to achieve integrative tests competing theories.

10.1017/s0140525x23002376 article EN Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2024-01-01

In this retrospective honoring the exemplary psychologist Daniel Kahneman (1934 - 2024), we present a curated selection of quotes from academic community reflecting on his ideas. These submissions, gathered wide range scholars, highlight Kahneman's contributions to fields spanning attention, judgment, decision-making, and well-being. From exploration cognitive biases ground breaking work prospect theory, research revolutionized our understanding human behavior decision-making. Beyond...

10.31234/osf.io/m4c7f preprint EN 2024-06-07
Coming Soon ...